Archive

For the Global Events category

Destabilizing Venezuela: Longstanding US Policy

No Comments

 

images

by Stephen Lendman

 

It doesn’t surprise. It’s likely happening ahead of Venezuela’s April 14 presidential election. It’ll continue when it’s over.

 

Washington tolerates no independent governments. It demands pro-Western ones. It wants them serving US interests. Outliers are targeted for regime change.

 

Throughout his tenure, Chavez was America’s main hemispheric bete noire. He’s gone. Chavismo lives. Washington’s war on Venezuela continues.

 

It’s the oil, stupid. Venezuela has the world’s largest reserves. It’s also for unchallenged regional dominance. No holds barred tactics persist to achieve it.

 

On April 5, Russia Today (RT) headlined “New WikiLeaks cable reveals US embassy strategy to destabilize Chavez government.”

 

America’s Caracas embassy’s a hotbed of anti-Chavismo subversion. RT referred to past events. William Brownfield was US ambassador. He’s now Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.

 

From 2004 – 2006, his five-point plan included “strengthening democratic institutions,” (doing so by undermining them), “penetrating Chavez’s political base, dividing Chavismo, protecting vital US business, and isolating Chavez internationally.”

 

USAID handled implementation. It provided about $15 million dollars. It did so through its Office of Transition Initiatives (OTI). It was created in spring 2002. Money went for training and technical assistance. Over 300 anti-Chavismo organizations got it.

 

A November 9, 2006 US Caracas embassy cable explained. WikiLeaks exposed it. Its full unredacted text states:

 

“Classified By: Robert Downes, Political Counselor,

for Reason 1.4(d).

 

——-

SUMMARY

——-

 

“1.  (S)  During his 8 years in power, President Chavez has

systematically dismantled the institutions of democracy and

governance. The USAID/OTI program objectives in Venezuela

focus on strengthening democratic institutions and spaces

through non-partisan cooperation with many sectors of

Venezuelan society.

 

2.  (S)  In August of 2004, Ambassador outlined the country

team’s 5 point strategy to guide embassy activities in

Venezuela for the period 2004 ) 2006 (specifically, from the

referendum to the 2006 presidential elections). The

strategy’s focus is: 1) Strengthening Democratic

Institutions, 2) Penetrating Chavez’ Political Base, 3)

Dividing Chavismo, 4) Protecting Vital US business, and 5)

Isolating Chavez internationally.

 

3.  (S)  A brief description of USAID/OTI activities during

the aforementioned time period in support of the strategy

follows:

 

Strengthen Democratic Institutions

————-

 

4.  (S)  This strategic objective represents the majority of

USAID/OTI work in Venezuela. Organized civil society is an

increasingly important pillar of democracy, one where

President Chavez has not yet been able to assert full

control.

 

5.  (S)  OTI has supported over 300 Venezuelan civil society

organizations with technical assistance, capacity building,

connecting them with each other and international movements,

and with financial support upwards of $15 million. Of these,

39 organizations focused on advocacy have been formed since

the arrival of OTI; many of these organizations as a direct

result of OTI programs and funding.

 

6. (S)  Human Rights: OTI supports the Freedom House (FH)

“Right to Defend Human Rights” program with $1.1 million.

Simultaneously through Development Alternatives Inc. (DAI),

OTI has also provided 22 grants to human rights

organizations, totaling $726,000. FH provides training and

technical assistance to 15 different smaller and regional

human rights organizations on how to research, document, and

present cases in situations of judicial impunity through a

specialized software and proven techniques. Following are

some specific successes from this project, which has led to a

better understanding internationally of the deteriorating

human rights situation in the country:

 

Venezuelan Prison Observatory: Since beginning work with

OTI, OVP has taken 1 case successfully through the

inter-American system, achieving a ruling requiring BRV

special protective measures for the prison ‘La Pica.’ Also,

on November 7th – 12th they will be launching the

Latin-American Prison Observatory, consolidating their work

with a regional network. OVP receives technical support from

FH, as well as monetary support from Pan American Development Foundation (PADF). Due to the success of the OVP in raising awareness of the issue, the BRV has put pressure on them in the form of public statements, announcing investigations, accusing them of alleged crimes as well as death threats.

 

Central Venezuelan University Human Rights Center: This

center was created out of the FH program and a grant from

 

CARACAS 00003356  002.2 OF 004

 

DAI. They have successfully raised awareness regarding the

International Cooperation Law and the human rights situation

in Venezuela, and have served as a voice nationally and

internationally.

 

Human Rights Lawyers Network in Bolivar State: This group

was created out of the FH program and a grant from the DAI

small grants program. They are currently supporting the

victims of a massacre of 12 miners in Bolivar State allegedly

by the Venezuelan Army. Chavez himself was forced to admit

that the military used excessive force in this case. They

will present their case to the Inter-American Commission on

Human Rights in February 2007.

 

7. (S) Citizen Participation in Governance:  Venezuelan

NGOs lack a long history of social activism. In response,

OTI partners are training NGOs to be activists and become

more involved in advocacy. The successes of this focus have

been as follows:

 

Support for the Rights of the Handicapped: OTI has funded 3

projects in the Caracas area dealing with the rights of the

handicapped. Venezuela had neither the appropriate

legislation nor political will to assure that the cities are

designed and equipped in a handicapped sensitive fashion.

Through these programs, OTI brought the issue of the

handicapped to the forefront, trained advocacy groups to

advocate for their rights and lobby the National Assembly,

and alerted the press regarding this issue. Subsequent to

this, the National Assembly was forced to consider

handicapped needs and propose draft legislation for the issue.

 

Por la Caracas Possible (PCP): Once-beautiful Caracas has

decayed over the past several years due to corruption and

lack of attention. PCP is a local NGO dedicated to bringing

attention to this problem. They have held campaigns with

communities shining a light on the terrible job elected

leadership are doing resolving the problems in Caracas.

During their work they have been expelled from communities by

the elected leaders, further infuriating communities that

already feel un-assisted.

 

8. (S) Civic Education: One effective Chavista mechanism

of control applies democratic vocabulary to support

revolutionary Bolivarian ideology. OTI has been working to

counter this through a civic education program called

‘Democracy Among Us.’ This interactive education program

works through NGOs in low income communities to deliver five

modules: 1) Separation of Powers, 2) Rule of Law, 3) The

Role and Responsibility of Citizens, 4) Political Tolerance,

and 5) The Role of Civil Society. Separate civic education

programs in political tolerance, participation, and human

rights have reached over 600,000 people.

 

————–

Penetrate Base/Divide Chavismo

————–

 

9. (S) Another key Chavez strategy is his attempt to divide

and polarize Venezuelan society using rhetoric of hate and

violence. OTI supports local NGOs who work in Chavista

strongholds and with Chavista leaders, using those spaces to

counter this rhetoric and promote alliances through working

together on issues of importance to the entire community.

OTI has directly reached approximately 238,000 adults through

over 3000 forums, workshops and training sessions delivering

alternative values and providing opportunities for opposition

activists to interact with hard-core Chavistas, with the

desired effect of pulling them slowly away from Chavismo. We

have supported this initiative with 50 grants totaling over

$1.1 million. There are several key examples of this:

 

10. (S) Visor Participativo: This is a group of 34 OTI

 

CARACAS 00003356  003.2 OF 004

 

funded and technically assisted NGOs working together on

municipal strengthening. They work in 48 municipalities

(Venezuela has 337), with 31 MVR, 2 PPT and 15 opposition

mayors. As Chavez attempts to re-centralize the country, OTI

through Visor is supporting decentralization. Much of this

is done through the municipal councils (CLPPs). The National

Assembly recently passed a law that creates groups parallel

to the mayor’s offices and municipal councils (and that

report directly to the president’s office). These groups are

receiving the lions share of new monies Chavez is pumping

into the regions, leaving the municipalities under-funded.

As Chavez attempts to re-centralize all power to the

Executive in the capital, local Chavista leadership are

becoming the opposition as their individual oxen are gored.

Visor has been providing these leaders with tools and skills

for leadership to counter the threat represented by the new

legislation.

 

11. (S) CECAVID: This project supported an NGO working

with women in the informal sectors of Barquisimeto, the 5th

largest city in Venezuela. The training helped them

negotiate with city government to provide better working

conditions. After initially agreeing to the women’s

conditions, the city government reneged and the women shut

down the city for 2 days forcing the mayor to return to the

bargaining table. This project is now being replicated in

another area of Venezuela.

 

12. (S) PROCATIA: OTI has partnered with a group widely

perceived by people in the large Caracas &barrio8 as

opposition leaning. Due to incompetence of the local elected

leadership, the garbage problem in Catia is a messy issue for

all those who live there. This group has organized brigades

to collect and recycle trash, in the process putting pressure

on the government to provide basic services and repositioning

the group as a respected ally of the ‘barrio.’

 

13. (S) Finally, through support of a positive social

impact campaign in cooperation with PAS, OTI funded 54 social

projects all over the country, at over $1.2 million, allowing

Ambassador to visit poor areas of Venezuela and demonstrate

US concern for the Venezuelan people. This program fosters

confusion within the Bolivarian ranks, and pushes back at the

attempt of Chavez to use the United States as a ‘unifying

enemy.’

 

—————

Isolate Chavez

—————

 

14. (S) An important component of the OTI program is

providing information internationally regarding the true

revolutionary state of affairs. OTI’s support for human

rights organizations has provided ample opportunity to do so.

The FH exchanges allowed Venezuelan human rights

organizations to visit Mexico, Guatemala, Peru, Chile,

Argentina, Costa Rica, and Washington DC to educate their

peers regarding the human rights situation. Also, DAI has

brought dozens of international leaders to Venezuela,

university professors, NGO members, and political leaders to

participate in workshops and seminars, who then return to

their countries with a better understanding of the Venezuelan

reality and as stronger advocates for the Venezuelan

opposition.

 

 

15. (S) More recently, OTI has taken advantage of the draft

law of International Cooperation to send NGO representatives

to international NGO conferences where they are able to voice

their concerns in terms that global civil society understands. So far, OTI has sent Venezuelan NGO leaders to Turkey, Scotland, Mexico, Dominican Republic, Chile, Uruguay, Washington and Argentina (twice) to talk about the law. Upcoming visits are planned to Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia.

 

CARACAS 00003356  004.2 OF 004

 

OTI has also brought 4 recognized experts in NGO law from

abroad to Venezuela to show solidarity for their Venezuelan

counterparts. PADF supported visits by 4 key human rights

defenders to the Inter-American Human Rights Commission

meetings in Washington in October of 2006. These have led to

various successes:

 

Civicus, a world alliance of NGOs, has put the Venezuela

issue on their Civil Society Watch short list of countries of

concern.

 

Gente de Soluciones, a Venezuelan NGO presented their

“Project Society” to the OAS General Assembly. While there,

they met with many of the Ambassadors and Foreign Ministers

of OAS member states to express concern about the law.

 

Uruguayan parliamentarians met with NGOs at a special session of the Foreign Affairs commission, and have promised to help where they can.

 

The Human Rights Commission of the OAS has made several

public statements and sent private letters to the National

Assembly expressing concern with the law.

 

The most prestigious law faculty in Buenos Aires, Argentina

has committed to hosting an event to deal with the draft law.

 

The Democratic Observatory of MERCOSUR plans to hold an event early next year to discuss the draft law.

 

So far the Venezuelan National Assembly has received many

letters and emails of opposition to the law from groups all

over the world.

 

A private meeting between 4 Venezuelan human rights defenders and Secretary General Jose Miguel Inzulsa during the October 2006 Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (please protect).

 

The press, both local and international, has been made aware

of the proposed law and it has received wide play in the US

as well as in Latin America.

 

16. (S) OTI has also created a web site which has been sent

to thousands of people all over the world with details of the

law in an interactive format.

 

Comment

——-

 

17. (S) Through carrying out positive activities, working

in a non-partisan way across the ideological landscape, OTI

has been able to achieve levels of success in carrying out

the country team strategy in Venezuela. These successes have

come with increasing opposition by different sectors of

Venezuelan society and the Venezuelan government. Should

Chavez win the December 3rd presidential elections, OTI

expects the atmosphere for our work in Venezuela to become

more complicated.

 

BROWNFIELD”

 

OTI funded over 50 projects. They aimed to foster “confusion within the Bolivarian ranks, and pushe(d) back at the attempt of Chavez to use the United States as a unifying enemy.”

 

In 2010, Venezuela closed OTI’s office. It did so for good reason. Chavez knew what he faced. So does acting president/United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) presidential candidate Nicolas Maduro. Elections are scheduled for Sunday, April 14.

 

He’s odds on favored to win. Polls show him way ahead. He’s concerned about internal subversion and sabotage. On April 4, he ordered Venezuela’s military to protect power plants just in case.

 

He did so following suspicious Cararcas and Aragua state outages. He called them opposition efforts to wage “electricity” and “economic war.” He stressed the urgency of protecting “national security.”

 

Venezuela’s state-run National Electricity Corporation (Corpoelec) found 11 burned out transformers throughout Aragua state. Company president Argenis Chavez cited sabotage. So did Maduro, saying “(t)here’s nothing to indicate (a conventional) failure.”

 

“It’s not a secret to anyone that inside the structure of the electrical system, there are (anti-Chavismo) elements. Thank God every day there are less workers who answer the right-wing call to commit sabotage. But there is internal and external sabotage.”

 

Argenis Chavez said suspicious power failures occurred before last October’s presidential elections. They’re happening again now. Perhaps other destabilizing schemes are planned ahead of April 14.

 

Washington’s long arm’s been involved throughout Chavez’s tenure. It continues now. Replacing Chavismo is policy. Past efforts failed.

 

They included an aborted two-day April 2002 coup, a 2002-03 64-day oil industry lockout, an unsuccessful 2004 recall election, Western scoundrel media campaigns, and millions of dollars given anti-Chavismo political parties, journalists, NGOs, and other groups wanting oligarch power restored.

 

In 2006, Washington established a Director of National Intelligence (DNI) mission manager for Venezuela and Cuba. CIA veteran Timothy Langford heads it. He replaced interim manager Patrick Maher.

 

In June 2007, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Craig Kelly called Chavez a regional “enemy.” He proposed “six main areas of action for the US government to limit (his) influence (and) reassert US leadership in the region.”

 

He stressed “strengthen(ing) ties to those military leaders in the region who share our concern over Chavez.” He proposed “psychological operations” to exploit government vulnerabilities.

 

“We also need to make sure that the truth about Chavez – his hollow vision, his empty promises, his dangerous international relationships, starting with Iran – gets out, always exercising careful judgment about where and how we take on Chavez directly/publicly.”

 

Throughout his tenure, Washington wanted him ousted. It wants state-owned enterprises privatized. It wants Bolivarian initiatives abolished. It wants Venezuela made a client-state.

 

In April 2008, the Pentagon reactivated its Fourth Fleet. It did so after a 60 year hiatus. It was established during WW II. It was disbanded in 1950.

 

It’s part of US Naval Forces Southern Command (USSOUTHCOM). It’s headquartered at Naval Station Mayport in Jacksonville, FL. It operates throughout Central and Latin America.

 

Its purpose involves “conducting varying missions including a range of contingency operations, counter(ing) narco-terrorism, and theater security cooperation activities.”

 

Former USSOUTHCOM commander Admiral James Stevenson called the move a message to the entire region, not just Venezuela.

 

National War College commandant General Robert Steele said:

 

“The United States’ obsession with Venezuela, Cuba and other things indicates they are going to use more military force, going to use that instrument more often.”

 

US bases infest Latin America. Seven operate in eastern Colombia. It borders Venezuela. Chavez was justifiably concerned. He called stationing US forces nearby “a threat of war at us.”

 

So far, US destabilization efforts wage it by other means. Expect no letup ahead. Venezuela’s targeted for regime change. Obama’s more belligerent than Bush.

 

Chavismo remains the threat of a good example. Washington wants a client state replacing it.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

 

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

 

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

 

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

 

It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

 

http://www.dailycensored.com/destabilizing-venezuela-longstanding-us-policy/

Thatcherism

No Comments

 

308979-margaret-thatcher-ronald-regan

by Stephen Lendman

 

Thatcherism represents Chicago School fundamentalism writ large. She’s gone. She won’t be missed.

 

She launched a corporatist revolution. She headed Britain down a slippery slope toward unfettered predatory capitalism.

 

She transferred public wealth to private hands. She privatized British Telecom, British Gas, British Airways, British Steel and other state enterprises.

 

She force-fed deregulation. She cut social benefits. She enacted corporate-friendly tax cuts. She cracked down hard on non-believers. She waged war on labor.

 

In 1984, she unleashed thousands of truncheon-wielding riot police against striking coal miners. Doing so sent a message. Worker rights no longer mattered. “New realism” became code language. Free market fundamentalism was policy.

 

UK Prime Minister David Cameron twisted truth saying:

 

“Margaret Thatcher’s government was defined by taking the side of the people against the powerful, the vested interests – those whose survival depended on keeping things as they were.”

 

Wall Street Journal editors called her “Maggie the great….The woman who save Britain with a message of freedom.”

 

New York Times editors said she was “a pathbreaker from the moment she took office.” She “sparked” a “capitalist revival.”

 

According to Washington Post editors, she was “in every sense a leader.”

 

John Pilger was right saying:

 

“Margaret Thatcher’s government was defined by overseeing the greatest ever transfer of wealth from the bottom of society to the top.”

 

“In the name of little people, she handed billions to the richest in tax cuts and de-regulation, a theft from which Britain has never recovered.”

 

Indeed not. Millions of ordinary Brits today are worse off than ever in modern times. What Thatcher began, Tories and New Labour continue. Robbing poor Peter to pay rich Paul is policy. So is allying with America’s imperial wars.

 

In 1975, Thatcher rose to Conservative Party leadership. She was prime minister from May 4, 1979 to November 28, 1990. She was Britain’s longest-serving PM. She was the only woman to serve in that capacity. She waged war on social democracy.

 

She was called “The Iron Lady” for good reason. On October 10, 1980, she told parliament:

 

“To those waiting with bated breath for that favourite media catchphrase, the ‘U-turn’, I have only one thing to say: “You turn if you want to. The lady’s not for turning.”

 

Saying it defined her ideological harshness. It became a Thatcherite motto. She never looked back. She was unapologetic. She cared little about ordinary Brits. It showed and then some.

 

On January 31, 1976, she said:

 

“Ladies and gentlemen, I stand before you tonight in my red chiffon evening gown, my face softly made up, my fair hair gently waved – the Iron Lady of the Western World.”

 

“Me? A Cold War warrior? Well, yes – if that is how they wish to interpret my defense of values of freedoms fundamental to our way of life.”

 

On March 31, 1982, she said:

 

“I am extraordinarily patient, provided I get my own way in the end.”

 

To this day, she remains a polarizing figure. She was hardline, unbending, divisive, bellicose and heartless. She influenced South Africa’s Nelson Mandela.

 

After release from prison he said:

 

“I am a loyal and disciplined member of the African National Congress. I am therefore in full agreement with all of its (social justice) objectives, strategies and tactics.”

 

“There must be an end to white monopoly political power and a fundamental restructuring of our political and economic systems to ensure that the inequalities of apartheid are addressed and our society thoroughly democratized.”

 

He quoted his own 1964 words, saying he was prepared to die for “a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities.”

 

On May 10, 1994, two weeks after taking office, he addressed parliament. He endorsed ANC Reconstruction and Development Program (RDP) socioeconomic issues.

 

They included democracy, growth, development, reconstruction, redistribution and reconciliation. Specific concerns were housing, healthcare, land reform, jobs, education, public works, clean water, and electrification.

 

He called RDP principles the “centerpiece of what this Government will seek to achieve, the focal point on which our attention will be continuously focused.”

 

As president, he reneged. He surrendered to finance capital. Thatcherism became policy. Promised social reforms were abandoned. Long-suffering apartheid victims were spurned.

 

Thatcher’s Britain became a cutthroat capitalist laboratory. She believed markets work best unfettered of rules, regulations, onerous taxes, trade barriers, and human interference.

 

The best government is none at all. Whatever it can do, business does better so let it. Public wealth should be in private hands. Profit-making should be unrestrained.

 

Corporate taxes should be cut or abolished. Social services should he curtailed or ended. Economic freedom is an end in itself. It’s indispensable toward achieving political freedom.

 

Union busting became policy. Waging war on labor followed. She called unions “the enemy within.” She revived jingoism. She waged war to control Argentina’s Las Malvinas.

 

She championed colonialism. She supported apartheid. She called the African National Congress a terrorist organization. She supported Chilean despot Augusto Pinochet.

 

She unleashed death squads against Northern Ireland’s Republican separatists. She let hunger striker IRA activist/British MP Bobby Sands and nine other prisoners starve to death. She didn’t give a damn if they lived or died.

 

She launched a neoliberal revolution. She began what’s now broken. She turned Britain into an industrial wasteland. It became deindustrialized. She helped financialize it. She initiated a process of transforming it into a low-wage service economy.

 

Britain today is troubled. It’s headed for tyranny and ruin. It’s a testimony to her legacy. Her ideological extremism caused widespread human wreckage.

 

She opposed market-interfering democracy, egalitarian principles, government-provided social services, workers free from bosses, citizens from dictatorship, and countries from colonialism.

 

She endorsed economic freedom as a be-all-and-end-all. She believed limited government and unrestrained profit-making refects the essence of democracy.

 

She called social democracy, collectivism, socialism, and welfare state economies the road to serfdom. It produces “bondage and misery.” It’s “coercion,” not “freedom.”

 

It was hokum. It’s what today’s ideologues profess. Exploitation is the price of “economic freedom.” It’s the flip side of unfettered capitalism. It creates horrific human wreckage.

 

Living standards are lowered. Vital benefits are lost. Poverty and unemployment rise. So does human misery.

 

Thatcherism is unforgiving. Corporatism subverts democracy. It’s the best money can buy. It’s more fantasy than reality. Free market fundamentalism alone matters.

 

Social decay follows. So does growing human need. Rule of law principles, human rights, and other democratic values erode. Wealth extremes become unprecedented.

 

Poverty, unemployment, hunger, homelessness, and deprivation grow. Out-of-control militarism rages. Corporate and government corruption flourish. Ordinary people lose out.

 

Checks and balances are abandoned. Money power rules. It’s unchallenged. It has final say. Media scoundrels don’t explain. They  substitute managed news misinformation for truth and full disclosure.

 

Thatcher remained unapologetic to the end. Never have so many suffered from the ideological flimflam she endorsed.

 

Neoliberal poison ravages world economies. It’s globalized injustice. It reflects capitalism’s dark side. It’s worse today than ever.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.”

 

http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html

 

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com.

 

Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network.

 

It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

 

http://www.dailycensored.com/thatcherism/

Nobel Hypocrisy Wins Again

No Comments

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Call it a rite of fall. Nobel hypocrisy shows up annually. It came again this year. The only surprise was which disreputable honoree would win.

 

A surprise of sorts indeed. War criminals often become Peace Prize winners. This year a political/economic union won. Perhaps honoring Wall Street and neoliberal/war mongering organizations awaits. Or maybe Republicans and Democrats for causing so much harm globally.

 

Expect anything from Nobel Committee members. They represent wealth, power, privilege, imperial lawlessness, and war, not peace. Perhaps they believe war is peace. They’ll have to explain why scoundrels regularly win their highest award.

 

Their announcement said in part:

 

“The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2012 is to be awarded to the European Union (EU). The union and its forerunners have for over six decades contributed to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe.”

 

“In the inter-war years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee made several awards to persons who were seeking reconciliation between Germany and France.”

 

“Since 1945, that reconciliation has become a reality. The dreadful suffering in World War II demonstrated the need for a new Europe. Over a seventy-year period, Germany and France had fought three wars.”

 

“Today war between Germany and France is unthinkable. This shows how, through well-aimed efforts and by building up mutual confidence, historical enemies can become close partners.”

 

“The Norwegian Nobel Committee wishes to focus on what it sees as the EU’s most important result: the successful struggle for peace and reconciliation and for democracy and human rights.”

 

“The stabilizing part played by the EU has helped to transform most of Europe from a continent of war to a continent of peace.”

 

Apparently Nobel Committee members never heard of NATO. Its member states infest the continent. The North Atlantic Alliance functions as an imperial tool.

 

It was always for offense, not defense. Post-WW II, Western states had no enemies. East/West war never threatened. Hitler ravaged Soviet Russia. It didn’t regain normalcy until long after Stalin.

 

NATO was formed as an alliance for war, not peace. Cold War hyperbole incited fear. An arms race followed. So did permanent wars with or without NATO. From Truman to Obama they raged. They still do. NATO’s dirty hands operate in multiple theaters.

 

It’s a killing machine. America runs it. Leading EU member states include Germany, France, Britain, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, and Belgium. In total, 21 EU nations are NATO members.

 

They’re allied for war, not peace. They’re a dagger pointed at humanity’s heart. NATO has global ambitions. It includes ravaging countries everywhere.

 

Maybe Nobel Committee members don’t pay attention to what’s ongoing. Perhaps turning a blind eye colors their thinking.

 

Their tradition is long and inglorious. Consider past war criminal winners. Henry Kissinger may qualify as the worst of the lot. His resume includes:

 

  • three to four million Southeast Asian Vietnam War deaths;

 

  • the bloody overthrow of Chile’s Salvador Allende; Augusto Pinochet’s reign of terror;

 

  • support for some of the worst global despots;

 

  • Indonesia’s Surharto was one; Kissinger backed his bloody West Papua takeover; he also encouraged his East Timor genocide;

 

  • support for Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge, its rise to power and reign of terror;

 

  • backing of Pakistan’s overthrow of Bangladesh’s democratically elected government; a half million deaths followed;

 

  • his 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) advocated genocide; he called it forced world population control; he wanted worthless eaters removed; he recommended eliminating 500 million people by 2000 and millions more annually; and

 

  • numerous other global crimes against humanity were committed during his tenure as Nixon and Ford’s National Security Advisor and Secretary of State. He served as administration Svengali.

 

In 2001, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and the world body won. It was “for their work for a better organized and more peaceful world.”

 

Throughout his tenure, Annan violated the UN Charter’s mandate. It’s to “save succeeding generations from the scourge of war….”

 

Instead, he supported imperial lawlessness. He spurned peace. He never condemned or tried to end devastating Iraq sanctions. They killed around 1.5 innocent men, women and children. He stood by, watched, and did nothing.

 

He never denounced America’s lawless 2003 war. He was silent while Washington-led NATO ravaged Afghanistan. He supported the worst of Israeli crimes.

 

He said nothing about America’s failed attempts to oust Hugo Chavez or success removing Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Like NATO, he’s an imperial tool. He resurfaced in Syria.

 

His so-called peace plan was cover for regime change. He’s complicit in war crimes. He’s a world class scoundrel. His record is testimony to failure, betrayal, and criminality.

 

His sole achievement was spurning peace for war.

 

Three former Israeli prime ministers also got Nobel Peace Prizes. In 1978, Menachem Begin won. In 1994, so did Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres.

 

All three are war criminals. They and other Israeli leaders reigned terror on Palestinian civilians for decades. Netanyahu continues their deplorable viciousness. He’s Israel’s worst ever leader. He’s a world class thug. Expect Nobel Committee members one day to honor him. It wouldn’t surprise.

 

In 2007, Al Gore won. He put politics over principle. He was pro-business, anti-union, pro-war, anti-peace, and no friend of the earth.

 

His “Earth in the Balance” book was more theater than advocacy. His so-called “green” credentials were used to further his pro-corporate/anti-populist/imperial agenda.

 

Numerous others like him comprise the Nobel Committee’s hall of shame. Four US presidents stand out. In 1906, Theodore Roosevelt won. He once said he’d “welcome almost any war, for I think this country needs one.”

 

He was honored for sponsoring the Spanish/American war and Philippines genocide. In May 1902, Senator George Hoar denounced him on the Senate floor, saying:

 

“You have sacrificed nearly ten thousand American lives – the flower of our youth. You have devastated provinces. You have slain uncounted thousands of the people you desire to benefit.”

 

“You have established re-concentration camps. Your generals are coming home from their harvest bringing sheaves with them, in the shape of other thousands of sick and wounded and insane to drag out miserable lives, wrecked in body and mind.”

 

“You make the American flag in the eyes of a numerous people the emblem of sacrilege in Christian churches, and of the burning of human dwellings, and of the horror of the water torture.”

 

Having done that and more, perhaps he deserved two Nobels. He wanted Pax Americana enforced through the barrel of a gun.

 

In 1919, Woodrow Wilson was honored. He broke his campaign pledge to keep “us out of war.” He wanted involvement in WW I. In April 1917, he established the Committee on Public Information (CPI or Creel Committee).

 

Its mission was enlisting public support for war and undermining opposition sentiment. It worked as planned. It turned pacifist Americans into raging German haters. The rest is history.

 

Wilson’s resume also includes the 1913 Federal Reserve Act. For nearly a century, it let bankers wage financial war on humanity.

 

In 2002, Jimmy Carter won. He got Argentine death squad leaders involved in training Nicaraguan contras. He supported Salvadoran fascists. He helped Khmer Rouge killers. He backed despots like South Korea’s Chun Doo Hwan.

 

He armed Suharto after his East Timor genocide. He began covert operations in Afghanistan. He enlisted mujahedeen fighters against Soviet Russia. He supported neoliberal harshness. In 2002, he won the award he wanted for years.

 

In 2009, Obama became the fourth US presidential recipient. He’s the worst of the lot by far. Nobel Committee members said it was for his “extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.”

 

“Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”

 

He “created a new climate in international politics.”

 

He supports efforts to strengthen “democracy and human rights.”

 

“Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future.”

 

He was less than nine months in office. He was learning his trade. His crimes of war, against humanity, and genocide were just beginning. His war cabinet assured it. One observer called it a “kettle of hawks.”

 

Neocons said McCain couldn’t have chosen better. He’ll continue where Bush left off. He did that and more. He’s still at it. Maybe he’ll become a double honoree.

 

Nobel Committee members reward warriors. They deplore peace. Their awards show what they value most. It reflects Alfred Nobel’s legacy.

 

He got rich inventing dynamite and manufacturing weapons. He was a 19th century war profiteer. Late in life he reinvented himself. He established awards bearing his name.

 

One was for peace he deplored. His business depended on war. There was plenty around then. There’s more than ever now. Nobel’s legacy legitimizes wars and leaders who wage them.

 

Honoring EU nations shouldn’t surprise. They’re waging hot wars and financial ones on humanity. Committee members recognized their achievement. Perhaps they’ll be encouraged to do more.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”

 

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

 

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Turkish False Flag on Syria

No Comments


 

by Stephen Lendman

 

The news is out but bears repeating. New reports confirm it. It shouldn’t surprise. It’s one of the oldest stunts around. Attacks launched are blamed on victims. Wars follow. More on Turkey’s false flag below.

 

Sinking the Lusitania in May 1915 preceded America’s April 1917 WW I entry. The 1933 Reichstag fire helped Hitler assume dictatorial powers.

 

On August 31, 1939, Nazis impersonating Poles attacked a Gleiwitz radio station. It was on the border between the two countries. WW II followed.

 

Roosevelt manipulated the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. It gave him the war he wanted. Japan’s fleet was tracked across the Pacific. Pearl Harbor’s Admiral HE Kimmel wasn’t warned. Casualties were needed to turn pacifist Americans into raving Japan haters and get congressional support.

 

Numerous other false flags followed. The August 1964 Gulf of Tonkin incident is well-known. Over a decade of war followed. For suffering Vietnamese it never ended.

 

In August 1990, Washington colluded with Kuwait’s al-Sabah monarchy. Saddam was entrapped to invade. In January 1991, the Gulf War began. Genocidal sanctions, more war, occupation, and destruction of the “cradle of civilization” followed.

 

September 11, 2001 was the Big Lie of our time. Virtually everything about the official story was falsified. Most Americans still believe it. Wars on humanity rage out-of-control. Millions of corpses attest to Washington’s viciousness.

 

False flags are an American tradition. Big Lies launch wars. Official accounts are fake. Propaganda works that way. Turkey’s ruling government is a Washington tool. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan is a useful stooge. So are top officials around him.

 

They threaten world peace and their own people. On October 6, Hurriyet Daily News headlined “Turkey not far away from war: Erdogan.”

 

On October 5, he said:

 

“We are not war-lovers, but we are not far from war either….I am calling once more on the al-Assad regime and its supporters: Don’t dare to test Turkey’s patience.”

 

“We are not bluffing and we will follow this incident closely. God willing, the Syrian people would soon be saved from this cruelty and governed by an administration that guarantees the rights of all parties.”

 

He referred to the alleged Syrian mortar attack. Five Turkish nationals were killed. What he omitted says more than he revealed. Early reports suggested perhaps a stray Syrian mortar accidentally struck Turkish territory.

 

On October 6, Reuters and other news services reported more mortars from Syrian territory landing in Turkish territory. For four consecutive days, Turkish artillery shelled in response.

 

Erdogan is Washington’s lead regional belligerent. Smell a rat about what’s going on because there is one.

 

On October 6, the Syrian National News Agency (SANA) headlined “Yurt Newspaper: Erdogan’s Government Handed over the Mortars to Armed (Free Syrian Army) Groups in Syria which Shelled Akcakale Town.”

 

Yurt is a Turkish newspaper. Contributor Ali Sirmen reported what’s going on. He said Erdogan is acting on Washington’s behalf. He’s complicit in war crimes.

 

“The Newspaper also revealed that the bomber which was used to launch the mortar on the Turkish Akcakale town is only used by NATO.”

 

Editor-in Chief Merdan Yanardag explained more. He claimed he had information from a reliable source. He said “Turkey was the side which sent the mortars to the members of the so-called” Free Syrian Army.

 

This information “affirms that the Government of Erdogan’s wrong policy was behind the falling of the mortar in the town that claimed the lives of 5 Turks.”

 

Hamsayeh.Net (Iran & International News Online) reported the same story. On October 6, it also headlined “Turkey Attempts to Trigger a NATO-led War on Syria, saying:

 

Turkey is one of 28 NATO countries. It’s very much part of Washington’s imperial wars. In 2011, it helped wage war on Libya. It’s doing it now on Syria.

 

Even The New York Times admitted that it’s unknown who’s responsible for mortars landing in Turkey. Ankara’s knee-jerk response was scripted in Washington. False flag planning originated there.

 

Obama officials orchestrated the whole show. Ousting Assad was planned years ago. Only its timing remained to be determined. It arrived and continues daily. Turkey’s false flag suggests full-scale intervention perhaps looms.

 

Whether it precedes or follows US elections doesn’t matter. It’s likely coming. Perhaps Libya 2.0 is planned. NATO already is involved. Lead belligerents include America, Britain, France, and Turkey.

 

On October 6, Press TV headlined “Syrian army kills dozens of insurgents including four Turks,” saying:

 

Syria reported four Turkish nationals were killed in Aleppo. It’s not clear whether or not they were combatants. Perhaps more information will clarify.

 

In March 2012, Syrian forces captured 13 French officers. They were caught redhanded with FSA fighters. At the time, France’s foreign ministry dismissed the report. Lying is official policy.

 

On October 4, Syria News headlined “Turkey: Syrian rebels have taken responsibility for attack on Turkish village?!” saying:

 

Germany’s ZDF television reported the news. It said:

 

“Rockets and Mortar Fire – Turkey exacts vengeance for an attack from the Syrian side which took place yesterday afternoon. For weeks, Ankara has warned for any provocation in direction to Turkey. Until late at night, the fighting has taken place. Meanwhile, Syrian rebels have taken responsibility for this provocation.”

 

Another ZDF program called “Heute in Europa” reported the same story, saying:

 

“Yesterday night, Turkey took revenge for attacks from REBELS in Syria that have previously attacked a Turkish border village.”

 

Mortars were launched from territory controlled by FSA fighters. A leaked video clip said they admitted responsibility for striking Akcakale and killing five Turkish nationals.

 

On October 6, Mossad-connected DEBKAfile headlined “Syrian soldiers told to stay 10km from Turkish border, forming buffer zone.”

 

They were ordered out of artillery range. “Turkey had begun clearing a 10 km deep strip on the Syrian border” to facilitate FSA movement. The London Guardian reported the same thing.

 

Clearly the ball advanced closer to war. False flag provocations make it more likely.

 

On October 6, Voice of Russia‘s Roman Mamonov headlined “Turkey Effectively Declares War Against Syria,” saying:

 

Ankara preparations are underway. Parliamentary authorization was approved. Institute of Strategic Estimates expert Azhdar Kurtov said:

 

“Declarations made by the Turkish leadership speak for themselves. This is not just militant rhetoric but an order to the armed forces, in case of an emergency, to cross the border and carry out military activities on Syrian territory. What is this if not a war?”

 

“Though, certainly, Turkish commanders and politicians will think twice before starting an invasion. In my opinion, they will carry out a massive probing, just like towards another neighboring country, Iraq. The Turkish armed forces supported by their air force are quite capable of carrying out local hostilities on Syrian territory.”

 

Damascus understands the situation. It’s doing what it can to cool tensions. It’s impossible when foreign militants launch cross-border attacks from its territory on Turkey.

 

It’s a setup, a provocative false flag. At the same time, Syria’s army is strong and able to retaliate. Turkey is playing with fire. Full-scale war assures all sides lose.

 

What’s coming remains to unfold. Heightened tensions suggest the worst. It’s hard imagining why Erdogan and top officials around him would risk so much for so little. Serious internal opposition exists for good reason. Whether it can stop him remains unknown.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”

 

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

 

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Cowardly Terrorists Murder Syrian Civilians

No Comments

by Stephen Lendman

 

Aleppo murders are the latest example. Western-recruited death squads ruthlessly target civilians. They’re armed and directed to do so. They’re merciless cowards.

 

Innocent men, women and children die. Murdering children, raping women, and beheading men are their specialities. So are other atrocities. Since winter 2011, many thousands of Syrians were slaughtered. Dozens more succumb daily.

 

That’s what terrorism is all about. Imperialism operates that way. Barbarism best describes it. It’s longstanding US practice in all its direct and proxy wars. Respect for human life isn’t America’s long suit. It never was.

 

Ravaging one country after another is official policy. It’s been longstanding since WW II. Post-9/11, it intensified. Peace, stability, and human rights aren’t in America’s vocabulary. The very notions are abhorrent.

 

Across the region, millions of corpses attest to Washington’s viciousness. Aleppo is the latest example. Fighting raged there on and off for weeks. It continues.

 

On October 3, the Syrian Arab News Agency (SANA) headlined “People’s Assembly Condemns Aleppo Bombings and Terrorists-backing States.”

 

People’s Assembly Speaker, Mohammad Jihad al- Laham, opened the session, saying:

 

“Aleppo woke up today on a heinous crime, as horrible terrorist bombings targeted innocent civilians in fulfillment of the terrorists’ scheme who do not have any humane values.”

 

“We condemn these terrorist bombings and the conspiring countries which are backing the terrorists.”

 

He hopes God will have mercy on the souls of martyrs. He wished quick recovery to those injured and expressed solace for families of those killed.

 

Most Syrians understand America’s conspiracy against their country. They know and say so. Law Professor Daoud Khairallah told Russia Today that 95% of militants in Syria are foreigners.

 

SANA said 34 died, 122 were injured, and both totals may rise. Other victims are trapped under rubble.

 

Three blasts occurred. At 7:50AM, in Saadallah al-Jabri Square, two booby-trapped cars with an estimated 1,000 kg of explosives were detonated. Suicide bombers are suspected.

 

A second explosion happened at 8:17AM. The Governate Building was targeted. Another booby-trapped car with about 500 kg of explosives detonated. Two mortar shells also fell near the Municipal Palace.

 

At 10:35AM, a third blast took place. It occurred when engineering units were trying to dismantle a 1,000 kg explosive device in a car terrorists detonated remotely near the al-Amir Hotel, Aleppo’s Chamber of Commerce, and the Central Bank.

 

SANA said “the terrorist bombings have caused great damage to public and private property, public buildings, hotels and residential places, indicating that 250 public and private cars were destroyed.”

 

“The competent authorities at the Interior Ministry rushed to the area to trace evidence, taking samples of human remnants and the explosive material to be sent to specialized laboratories to establish the identity of the perpetrators and ascertain the type of the explosive material.”

 

Investigations continue. Responsible parties and supporters are sought. Web site photos show extensive damage. They make disturbing viewing.

 

Russia’s Foreign Ministry also condemned the bombings, saying:

 

“We renew utter condemnation of all forms of terrorism and rejection of using terrorist acts under any circumstances.” It added that “initiators and the perpetrators of such acts must be severely punished.”

 

SANA said Syrian political parties condemned the killings. The Baath Arab Socialist Party blamed “criminal gangs and mercenaries,” adding:

 

“This terrorist act is a new episode of a series of similar bombings that hit several Syrian cities not to mention massacres against civilians, elderly men, women and children.”

 

The National Reform Party called what happened “treason because targeting military, public and private properties and institutions (amounts to) targeting the Syrian people and Syria’s territorial integrity.”

 

Syria’s Arab Socialist Union Party called Aleppo killings “an escalation of the organized terrorism aiming to break the Syrians’ will.”

 

On October 1, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem addressed the General Assembly in New York. He did so before Aleppo bombings occurred, saying:

 

“While the peoples of the world wait to see effective and coordinated international efforts to overcome those crises, the reality indicates, instead, the escalation of hegemony and domination on the fortunes of nations and peoples in a way that contradicts the principles and purposes enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and the norms of international law.”

 

Worst of all, “permanent members of the Security Council, who launched wars under the pretext of combating terrorism, now support terrorism in my country without any regard to the United Nations resolutions that established the regulations and mechanisms for concerted international efforts to fight this scourge away from political polarization and double standards.”

 

Daily slaughter and destruction continue. Historic sites are targeted. They’re destroyed or damaged. Western-backed foreign terrorists are responsible. “It is no surprise that the Security Council failed to condemn….terrorist bombings because some of its members are supporting such acts.”

 

He left no doubt which ones he meant. Washington bears most responsibility. Its regional regime change plans are longstanding. It’s waging permanent direct and proxy wars to replace independent government with pro-Western puppets.

 

Permanent war is official US policy. So is state terrorism. Crimes of war, against humanity and genocide follow. Complicit NATO and regional partners are criminally involved. UN officials pointing fingers the wrong way share guilt.

 

The stench of cold-blooded murder spreads everywhere. Responsible parties run America, key NATO countries, and allied regional states. They’re mad dog killers. They’re contemptuous of human life and rule of law principles.

 

They can’t wait to kill again. Atrocities are their specialty. Those most vulnerable are targeted. It’s the American way. The same goes for rogue NATO allies and complicit regional despots.

 

International law prohibits foreign interference. Syrians alone may choose who’ll govern them. Most abhor violence and condemn it. They support their government’s efforts to rout death squad elements.

 

They’re living under nightmarish conditions. No one knows from day to day who’ll live or die. No one’s safe from merciless death squads. No end of conflict looms.

 

Press TV’s CEO of English language broadcasting, Mohammad Sarafraz, said Syrian militants target journalists reporting truths Western scoundrels want suppressed.

 

“Threatening and shooting journalists reporting the truth…aims to send this message that they will be shot if they continue reporting the realities on the ground,” he said. “This is unprecedented.”

 

Countries arming and directing them bear most responsibility. “It’s true that mercenaries that are getting money to come to Syria to fight are responsible for the terrorist acts but countries that are supporting them are even more responsible.”

 

“Turkey is (at) the forefront of those countries.” Washington bears most responsibility. US Special Forces and CIA elements are directly involved.

 

Last month, Press TV’s Maya Naser was murdered in cold blood. At the same time, its Damascus bureau chief Hosein Mortada was shot in the back and wounded. Both reporters were covering Damascus bomb blasts when targeted.

 

They and other independent journalists receive frequent death threats. They courageously stay and do their job. Some like Maya pay with their lives. Hosein was flown to Tehran for surgery.

 

Turkey’s Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan acts provocatively and belligerently. He’s Washington’s lead aggressor against Syria. He shelters Western death squads on Turkish territory.

 

He’s involved in training, arming and directing them. He established a CIA command and control center in Adana. America’s Incirlik Air Base is located there.

 

He’s menacing regional peace. Will he or won’t he wage war on Syria? He called a stray Syrian mortar killing five Turkish civilians in Akcakale “the last straw.”

 

Turkey’s UN ambassador Ertugrul Apakan called the incident “a flagrant violation of international law as well as a breach of international peace and security.”

 

Ergogan wants Security Council action against Syrian “aggression.” His comments are scripted in Washington. He says what he’s told. He’s partnered with America’s war on humanity. He’s menacing his own people.

 

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon issued his latest one-sided statement, saying:

 

He “calls on the Syria government to respect fully the territorial integrity of its neighbors as well as to end the violence against the Syrian people.”

 

He said nothing about Syria’s neighbors respecting its “territorial integrity.” He ignored months of Western-generated violence murdering thousands of civilians and security forces.

 

His imperial credentials remain unblemished. He blames victims, not perpetrators. So does the UN Human Rights Council. They mock principles of their own Charter.

 

Turkish artillery responded provocatively. It struck targets near Syria’s Tel Abyad border town for two consecutive days. Several Syrian soldiers were killed.

 

Syrian Information Minister Omran al-Zoubi said authorities are investigating how Turkish lives were lost, adding:

 

“In case of border incidents that occur between any two neighboring countries, countries and governments must act wisely, rationally and responsibly, particularly since there’s a special condition on the Syrian-Turkish borders in terms of the presence of undisciplined terrorist groups spread across the borders who have varying agendas and identities.”

 

Erdogan’s spoiling for a fight. Washington eggs him on. White House spokesman Tommy Vietor said: “We stand with our Turkish ally and are continuing to consult closely on the path forward.”

 

Hillary Clinton said the same thing. She supports Turkey, of course, and blames Syria. She’s discussing with Ankara what’s next. She called spreading violence a “very, very dangerous situation.”

 

She should know. Washington bears full responsibility for what happened, and what’s been ongoing since winter 2011.

 

In Brussels, NATO held a special meeting. A statement followed, saying it “strongly condemns Syria, expresses solidarity with Turkey, and warns Syria to end its violent acts and violations of international law.”

 

NATO operates as a rogue killing machine. It’s well versed in violence and international law violations. Turkey is a member in good standing. It’s complicit in naked aggression when asked.

 

On October 4, Erdogan senior advisor Ibrahim Kalin said:

 

“Turkey has no interest in a war with Syria. But Turkey is capable of protecting its borders and will retaliate when necessary. Turkey has retaliated to yesterday’s incident without declaring war on Syria. Political, diplomatic initiatives will continue.”

 

At the same time, Ankara’s parliament considered a motion to permit further military action against Syria. Discussions were held in closed session.

 

Republican People’s Party (CHP) parliamentary group deputy chairman Muharrem Ince and his Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) counterpart, Oktay Vural, objected to closed door debate. They were outvoted.

 

Ince also opposes war on Syria. The motion discussed says the following:

 

“The ongoing crisis in Syria affects the stability and security in the region and now the escalating animosity affects our national security.”

 

“Syrian armed forces have been conducting assaults as part of military operations into Turkish land despite our several warnings and diplomatic overtures since Sept. 20, 2012.”

 

“This situation risks and threatens our national security. In this respect, the need for taking precautions and acting quickly against any threats to Turkey has arisen.”

 

“In the framework of the situation, under Article 92 of the Turkish Constitution, we kindly ask the Turkish Parliament to discuss a motion that authorizes the government for a year to send Turkish troops to foreign countries.”

 

Passage was overwhelming 320 – 129. It makes full-scale intervention more likely. Ince said the motion “has no limits. You can wage a world war with” it. Western-generated violence, complicit regional provocations, and heightened tensions risk it.

 

Repeated incidents suggest what’s coming. A regional conflict looks likely. The possibility should terrify everyone. If enough people cared, they could prevent it. Public concern so far is woefully lacking. Expect the worst. It’s coming.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”

 

http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html

 

Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour

Hey Ozzie 50 Years Is Too Damn Long

No Comments

Hey Ozzie 50 Years Is Too Damn Long

By Obi Egbuna, Jr

For those Africans at home and abroad who feel obligated to safeguard and elevate the tradition of uncompromising front-line struggle, our worst nightmare is that genuine freedom fighters will one day become extinct like dinosaurs or volcanoes. The only other thought equally as horrific is if they are replaced by critics, bought and paid for by
our former colonial and slave masters, whose sole purpose is to spread confusion and voice baseless opinions that only expose how truly out of touch they are with the everyday African woman, child and man. It is truly liberating to know that even during our most vulnerable moments the most oppressive forces on earth are having even more difficulty convincing their children that they must carry the torch of genocide, exploitation and fascism to the finish line.

When the commissioner of Major League Baseball, Bud Selig, slapped the manager of the Miami Marlins, Ozzie Guillen with a five-game suspension for expressing during a Time Magazine interview his admiration for Fidel Castro, this reaction exposed that the racist and terrorist Cuban network in Miami is on the verge of complete collapse. At the peak of their political strength and influence in the early 1980s, this network had the muscle to turn a boxing match between Alexis Arguello and Aaron Pryor at the Orange Bowl in 1982 into a huge anti-Cuba, anti-Sandinista event, hoping to garner sentiment for their mission to dispose of Socialism in the Americas. They had a willing partner in Arguello, who not only betrayed the revolution in Nicaragua, but physically fought on the side with the Contras and US Imperialism. In comparison, Joe DiMaggio’s trip to South Vietnam to give the middle finger to Ho Chi Minh or Jackie Robinson’s denunciation of Paul Robeson before the House of Un-American Activities Committee and his condemnation of Muhammad Ali for not fighting in the Vietnam War, seem like small potatoes.

Guillen was born in Venezuela, whose current President, Hugo Chavez, deeply admires Commandante Fidel Castro. Guillen, like Arguello, who when the Sandinistas first overthrew the ruthless Somoza family in Nicaragua used to wear his flag to the boxing ring, was a target for the Gusanos. After leading the Chicago White Sox to a World Series in 2005, Guillen returned to Venezuela with the trophy and visited President Chavez, only to turn around and say he would never vote for Chavez in a million years. These remarks came shortly after Guillen received US citizenship, proving green cards come with a much bigger price—your heart, mind and soul. Since Guillen in 2010 condemned the treatment of so-called immigrants by the state of Arizona, the question must be raised why Africans in the US, who are also protesting the rights of so-called immigrants, are not demanding that they be able to express their own political point of view, as protected by Freedom of Speech, without fear of deportation or any other form of persecution.

We are nearly 60 years removed from the deportation of our Trinidad-born, sister, warrior, Claudia Jones, who was shown the door by US Imperialism for her membership in the Communist Party and her condemnation of US Foreign Policy. Who knows, Guillen may have been briefed by INS about her life story when they learned of his interview with Time Magazine.

Another political milestone in their heyday was when the slimy Gusanos (worms in Spanish) in Miami used the big screen in Hollywood to rewrite the script of the 1932 gangster movie Scarface, produced by Billionaire Howard Hughes. The film was originally centered around the rise of the Mafia in Chicago, but was re-written to highlight how Fidel Castro tricked the Carter administration into granting political asylum to 125,000 Cubans, many of whom had come from prison and mental health facilities. This film has become a cult classic, mainly because of its excessive violence and the film’s main character Tony Montana, portrayed by Al Pacino, who escaped poverty courtesy of the lucrative drug trade. However, what has been forgotten is the purpose of this film—to show depict President Reagan as a hero trying rescue a country 90 miles off the coast of Florida from an evil dictator. The Gusanos in Miami decided to use Guillen’s remarks to rebound from a decade of political embarrassment and to show their benefactors in Washington that they are far from being at the end of the road, even though all evidence at our disposal says otherwise.

Recently, before the Pope visited Cuba, he met with the Gusanos out of courtesy mainly because the Vatican was an ally of the Reagan administration at the height of the Cold War. After listening to the Gusanos’ demands, the Pope still called for the lifting of the US blockade on Cuba, echoing the sentiments of his late predecessor, Pope John Paul II, who in spite of his role in the dismantling of socialism in Poland and Hungary, while rubbing shoulders with billionaire George Soros, openly condemned the US blockade on Cuba. The irony of this is that the Gusanos, who are from the Marielsta generation, never thought
they would live to see the Peter Pan generation, the first group of Cubans to defect after the triumph of the revolution, sit in their backyard and not only call for the lifting of the blockade, but openly criticize the Bush administration for imposing inflexible measures
that limited the ability of the Cubans in Miami to travel to Cuba and see their own relatives. The condemnation of this policy led to the Cuban American National Foundation (CANF) having to publish an article in April 2009 lifting US restrictions on Cuba, it is amusing to watch terrorists pretend to show compassion, when everyone who understands US-CUBA relations understand the diplomatic and military posture can be best described with two words seek and destroy.

Since the Gusanos seem to be such fans of Hollywood they should remember Al Pacino’s character Michael Corleone in Godfather III portrayed by a real life Gusano terrorist sympathizer, Andy Garcia, tell his nephew, “Never hate your enemy. It affects your judgment.” This would help them understand and appreciate Ozzie Guillen’s
statement about Fidel. The governments of Cuba and Venezuela have a medical project called Operation Miracle, which has helped thousands of Venezuelans who were on the verge of going permanently blind regain their eyesight. Did Gusanos apologists, such as ESPN analyst Dan LeBetard, ever consider for a second that one of those Venezuelans could be a relative or life-long friend of Guillen? What if Guillen made those remarks about Fidel after learning he lifted the pro-US Batista regime that placed a ban on Nicholas Guillen, the African revolutionary poet born in Cuba that prevented him from re-entering the country? It is a well known fact that Nicolas Guillen was appointed President of the National Cuban Writers Union and was declared by Fidel the Poet of the Revolution.

During the kidnapping of Elian Gonzalez by the Gusanos in 2000, Commandante Fidel Castro stated while addressing the Organization of Caribbean and Latin American Youth, that “In the four months Elian was being held in the US against his will, the average
US citizen learned more about Cuba than they had in 41 years, which proves our neighbors to the North will lose the War of Ideas in the 21st century.” Because Guillen has a reputation as a loose cannon, the Gusanos feared he would challenge the very foundation of their existence and the world would see they no longer have the political clout to do anything meaningful about it. While Guillen’s five-game suspension helped the Gusanos gain 15 minutes of fame, the fast track approach to propaganda by the US Imperialist media apparatus will make this issue a distant memory by the beginning of June. With all the political muscle the Gusanos claim to have here in Washington, Guillen’s punishment is the equivalent of the Ku Klux Klan putting a cross on your yard without setting it on fire.

By claiming his admiration for Fidel stems from his ability to survive for nearly 60 years, Guillen accidentally brought attention to the Gusanos terrorist cells that still exist in Miami during an election year and the role they played in the 638 assassination attempts on Fidel’s life since 1959. At the present moment, CANF is still adjusting to their attempted political makeover, which has them trying to distance themselves from their associations with naked terrorists like Luis Posada Carrilles and Orlando Bosch, whose main purpose in life was to put Commandante Fidel Castro in a pine box and be hailed as heroes by US Imperialism for their efforts. The Gusanos in Miami, who repudiated Guillen for his remarks, would have preferred if he followed the example of Carrilles, a Venezuelan-born Cuban who was directly involved in the Bay of Pigs invasion then and received training at the School of Americas in Fort Benning, Georgia, between 1963 and 1964. The Cuban American National Foundation now claims in their mission statement that change should be non-violent and meaningful, reflecting the natural and inalienable rights of the Cuban
people. It also states that change must come from within the island, not forcibly imported from abroad. This had to anger the terrorists in Miami who view Posada Carrilles and Bosch almost in the identical manner that Christians and Muslims see their prophets in the Holy Bible and Holy Quran.

The posturing by CANF illustrates how eager they are to sweep under the rug that this year marks the 20th anniversary of their decision to develop a paramilitary wing to compliment the work of the Coordination of United Revolutionary Organizations (CORU), which was run by Bosch when the leadership of CANF arrived at the conclusion that lobbying the US Congress in order to bring about a regime change in Cuba was not enough and more militant action had to be taken. The political highlights of Bosch’s career as a terrorist were pardoned by President Bush in 1990, including his role in the bombing of a Cuban airliner that claimed the lives of 73 people and in 1976 when Bush headed the CIA and refused a request by Costa Rica to have Bosch extradited for his role in masterminding that cowardly act of aggression.

We as Africans must understand how the efforts by US Imperialism to shield Bosch and Posada Carrilles from the appropriate form of punishment for their sadistic crimes are inextricably linked to Mumia Abu Jamal sitting on death row and the threats to have Assata Shakur extradited from safety in Cuba to return to her old prison cell in the US. The Congressional Black Caucus members who supported the Bush administration’s call to have sister Shakur extradited gave the lame excuse of not knowing Assata Shakur and Joanne Chesimard is the same person. What this reveals is that any statements they make concerning normalizing relations with Cuba are lip service at best or a chance to be in front of a camera.

For the pro-terrorist Gusanos in Miami the year 2011 will generate bitter sweet emotions for many years to come. While Carrilles was acquitted on all charges of terrorism and aggression in the beginning of April 2011, their beloved assassin Bosch was not only laid to rest, but from the looks of things, these events marks the end of an era for Miami as a haven for Cuban terrorists. The decision by the Gusanos to bash Guillen like a piñata at a birthday party was aimed at diverting attention from the case of the Cuban 5, whose international support is an extension of the world’s diplomatic corp. that have repeatedly and uncompromisingly called for the lifting of the US blockade on Cuba. The courage and patriotism of the Cuban 5 comes shining through as a beacon of light at a moment in history when US Imperialism is using the banner of Homeland Security to deny people their basic civil liberties and maintain their tradition of bombing countries that incur their wrath. Their courage also puts a rather intense microscope on a terrorist network in Miami that has direct ties to the White House, Congress and the Military Industrial Intelligence Police Complex. The Cuban 5 issue also spells disaster for the US government’s public
relations apparatus as it pertains to the immigration question. It is clear for everyone to finally see why citizens of Cuba have for all intents and purposes been exempt from the standard immigration procedures to which citizens are subject to from other nations of the world. There should be a slogan posted on the wall of INS headquarters that states “All Cubans ready to engage in countless acts of terrorism against Cuba are welcome,” with pictures of Carrilles and Bosch right next to these words. This would accurately reflect Cubans who live by the slogan coined by the founder of CANF Jose Mascanosa,“From
Proletarians to Profiterians.”

Guillen’s revelation about his admiration for Fidel frightened the Gusanos because the next words out of his mouth could be that maintaining the blockade against Cuba was absolutely racist and ridiculous. These words would create a platform to fight the blockade right in the Gusano’s backyard, making their worst political nightmare come true, protests and teach-ins about the blockade in the same place that the bulk of the assassination attempts of Fidel’s life were planned. This would have been even more humiliating than when Elian Gonzalez was snatched from the Gusano’s clutches as a result of President Clinton yielding to international pressure when he instructed Janet Reno to arrange the child’s departure from the landof the Gusanos.

The African community in the US must collectively acknowledge that our efforts to fight for the lifting of the US blockade on Cuba have been both casual and inconsistent. What makes this extremely troubling is the special and unique ties we have to Cuba that predate Fidel, Che Guevara and the July 26th movement overthrowing the Batista regime in 1959. As we are almost six months into the 50th anniversary of the US blockade on Cuba, a question that can be posed to our most visible organizations and spokes people is this: In 50 years have there been at least 50 protests, demonstrations, or press conferences to voice our displeasure with this policy? If the answer is no, then the main reason must be our reluctance to yank out the sweet tooth we have for JFK, who imposed the blockade in 1962 or to condemn those white liberals who convinced our people that political salvation lies in the bosom of the democratic party. Another crucial reason is our failure to realize that the blockade represents diplomatic terrorism of the highest order in that it has cost a country with a 60% African population, a country committed to free health and education, over $96 billion dollars that would have been invested in expanding on the already high-quality programs that are the staple of their revolution.

While many of us have defied the travel ban on Cuba, unfortunately having the monstrous blockade lifted is not a priority item on national agenda. This implies that for many of us a photo-op with Fidel was more of a motivation for taking the trip, as opposed to serious planning to return to the heart of Babylon with a new found commitment to defend Cuba’s integrity and sovereignty. Undoubtedly, because the US is in the middle of a presidential election, we can expect President Obama to put on an academy award-winning performance for the Gusanos that exceeds the showboating he did four years ago when he stated that in his lifetime “Cubans have not experienced Democracy or Human Rights.” This erroneous statement received a response from none other than Fidel himself.

The most valuable lesson Obama learned is that Fidel has maintained the tenacity that first gained international attention when he and his comrades were waging war on the Batista regime from the Sierra Maestra, and that making baseless comments when trying to score points with terrorists in Miami will not be tolerated. Whenever the bitter and vindictive reactionary Carlos Moore resurfaces and launches self serving attacks on the Cuban revolution, under the guise of representing Spanish speaking Africans born in Cuba, we only Africans in the US do their homework and refuse to allow themselves to be used as pawns in a game they obviously do not understand. There is no country in the Western
Hemisphere where Africans and Europeans co-exist that racism does not exist, the real issue is what genuine steps are being taken to eradicate racism, any Africans in the US who would are willing to get in the foxhole with Mr. Moore concerning this matter are not capable of identifying a nation more committed to this task than Cuba. The 60 individuals who were coerced and manipulated into signing their name to the ridiculous statement entitled “Acting On Our Conscience A Declaration Of African American Support For The Civil Rights In Cuba in 11/30/09,exposed one thing for the African community, they have lost the will to stand with the world majority and fight for the lifting of the blockade, therefore instead of appearing as outright agents of US Imperialism help create a masquerade and smoke screen that you are still fighting the good fight.

The African community should shower Ozzie Guillen with high praises for his apology to the Gusanos because if he didn’t mean what he said, he should have never made the comments in the first place. Those of us who consider Fidel the modern day John Brown or our favorite American President (when we use the true definition of America, which is the Western hemisphere, instead of what Democrats and Republicans believe) feel Guillen should have stuck to his guns. When he left Venezuela for what he was told is the land of milk and honey, he should have called INS and asked what the hell happen to his freedom of speech? If Guillen gets the urge to honestly express himself about the blockade but get cold feet when confronted by the Gusanos, we have a simple message for him HEY OZZIE 50 YEARS IS TOO DAMN LONG!

Obi Egbuna, Jr., is a US-based member of the Zimbabwe-Cuba Friendship
Association and the US Correspondent to the Herald (Zimbabwe’s National
Newspaper). Mr. Egbuna is also a frequent contributor to Your World News.
His email address is obiegbuna15@gmail.com.

The ultimate showdown …The clash between East and West == DOUBLE VETO BANS IMPERIAL WAR AGAINST SYRIA‏

No Comments

Arabian Sights…..

“I think that an objective analysis of events that are taking place on this earth today points towards some type of ultimate showdown. You can call it political showdown, or even a showdown between the economic systems that exist on this earth which almost boil down along racial lines. I do believe that there will be a clash between East and West. I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those that do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the systems of exploitation

We are confronted with the necessity of a battle which must be continued  until it has been won. That choice has already been made for us, and we have no option to simply wish it away.”

Malcolm X

DOUBLE VETO BANS IMPERIAL WAR AGAINST SYRIA

“…States of the Third World are sure to draw their conclusions from these recent events: those who choose to serve the United States, like Saddam Hussein, or to negotiate with them, like Muammar el-Qaddafi, could be executed by the imperial troops and their country destroyed. On the contrary, those who resist, like Bashar al-Assad, and build alliances with Russia and China will survive.

The setback of the GCC and NATO brings to light a power struggle that many scented, but no one could ascertain: the West won the media war but had to retreat from the military arena. To paraphrase Mao Zedong: they have become virtual tigers. During this crisis, and even today, Western leaders and Arab monarchs have managed to intoxicate not only their own people, but a large part of international public opinion. They made people believe that the Syrian population had risen against their government and that he conducted a bloody crackdown against political protesters. Satellite channels not only concocted arrangements for misleading the public, but they also shot staged images in a studio to fit their propaganda purposes. Ultimately, the GCC and NATO invented and kept alive through the media for ten months a revolution that existed only in words and images,…

Even if public opinion in the West and the Gulf is under informed on this subject, the United States and their vassals have been running since 2001 a vast network of secret prisons and torture centers, including inside the European Union. On the pretext of the war against terrorism, they have sown terror, kidnapped and tortured more than 80 000 people. During the same period, they created special operations units with an annual budget of nearly $10 billion, which boast of political killings in at least 75 countries, according to their own reports.

Regarding democracy, the United States today make no secret that in their eyes it does not stand for a “government of the people, by the people, for the people,” in the words of Abraham Lincoln, but the subjection of people to their will as illustrated by the policies and wars of President Bush. Moreover, their constitution rejects the principle of popular sovereignty and they have suspended fundamental freedoms by establishing a permanent state of emergency through the Patriot Act. As for their vassals in the Gulf, there is no need to mention that they are absolute monarchies.

It is this model that combines unashamedly massive crimes and humanitarian discourse, which was defeated by Russia and China; two States whose record on human rights and democracy, though very questionable, is infinitely superior to that of the GCC and NATO.

By making use of their veto, Moscow and Beijing have defended two principles: respect for the truth, without which justice and peace are impossible, and respect for the sovereignty of peoples and states, without which no democracy is possible.

The time has come to strive to rebuild a human society after a period of [western] barbarism.

Thierry Meyssan

 

, http://www.voltairenet.org/The-GCC-and-NATO-lose-their

http://www.4thmedia.org/2012/02/06/the-gcc-and-nato-lose-their-leadership-double-veto-bans-imperial-war-against-syria/

Syrian “rebels” exposed - George Galloway

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBHlTB1igxM

 

 

TEXT OF LEAKED ARAB LEAGUE MISSION REPORT: Reveals Media Lies Regarding Syria

Michel Chossudovsky

http://www.4thmedia.org/2012/02/03/text-of-leakd-arab-league-mission-report-reveals-media-lies-regarding-syria/

 

Exposed: The “Arab” [American Puppets] Agenda in Syria

Pepe Escobar

 

Here’s a crash course on the “democratic” machinations of the Arab League – rather the GCC League, as real power in this pan-Arab organization is wielded by two of the six Persian Gulf monarchies.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30444.htm

 

China at War with “Westernization”: The West’s “Divide & Conquer” Strategy

http://www.4thmedia.org/2012/02/02/president-hu-resolutely-walk-the-path-of-socialist-culture-development-with-chinese-characteristics/

 

 

 

 

The Globalization of War: The “Military Roadmap” to The World War III

http://www.4thmedia.org/2012/02/04/the-globalization-of-war-the-military-roadmap-to-world-war-iii-2/

 

 

 

…Venezuela is an outstanding example of the theoretical and practical role that the military can play in the revolutionary struggle for the independence of our peoples, as they did two centuries ago under the brilliant leadership of Simon Bolivar…

An eagle does not hunt flies”The Genius of Chavez

Fidel Castro

President Chavez presented his annual report on activities carried out in 2011 and his program for 2012 to the Venezuelan Parliament. After thoroughly carrying out the formalities required by this important activity, he addressed the official state authorities, members of parliament from all parties, and supporters and opposition members who had come to the Assembly to participate in the country’s most solemn act.

As usual, the Bolivarian leader was gracious and respectful to all those present. When anyone asked for the floor to make a clarification, he granted it as soon as possible. When one of the members of parliament, who had warmly greeted Chavez as did other opposition members, asked to speak, in a great political gesture Chavez interrupted his report presentation and gave her the floor. What surprised me was the extreme severity of the rebuke, launched against the president with words that really put to test Chavez’ chivalry and cold blood. The MPs statement was undoubtedly an insult, although this was not her intention. He alone was capable of calmly responding to the offensive word ‘thief’ that she had used to judge the president’s conduct in terms of the adopted laws and measures.

After verifying the exact term that was used, Chavez responded to the individual challenge for debate with an elegant and sedated phrase, “An eagle does not hunt flies,” and without adding another word he calmly proceeded with his report.

It represented an insurmountable test of mental agility and self control. Another woman, of unquestionable humble origins, expressed her astonishment in moving and heartfelt words over what she had just witnessed and the overwhelming majority present broke out in applause. Judging by the sheer volume, the applause seemed to be coming from all of Chavez’ friends and many of his adversaries as well.

Chavez’ report lasted more than nine hours without the people ever losing interest. Maybe because of that incident, his words were heard by an immeasurable number of people. Many times I have given extensive speeches on difficult topics, always striving to make the ideas I was transmitting understandable. And I was really at a loss to explain how that soldier of humble origins was able to keep his mind so agile and his incomparable talent to deliver such an address without losing his voice or strength.

To me politics is an extensive and decisive battle of ideas. Publicity is the work of publicists, who perhaps know the techniques to get listeners, spectators and readers to do what they are told to do. If that science, or art, or whatever they call it is employed for the good of human beings, they deserve some respect; the same respect merited by those who teach people how to think.

Venezuela today is the site of a great battle. Internal and external enemies of the revolution prefer chaos —as Chavez has said— to the just, organized and peaceful development of the country. Being accustomed to analyzing the events that have occurred over more than half a century, and to observing, with greater foundations for judgment, the eventful history of our time and human behavior, one learns to almost predict the future development of events.

To promote a far-reaching Revolution in Venezuela was no easy task. Venezuela is a country full of glorious history, but extraordinarily rich in resources that are of vital importance to the imperialist powers that have, and continue to map out guidelines in the world.

Political leaders the likes of Romulo Betancourt and Carlos Andres Perez lack the most minimal personal qualities to carry out such a task. Furthermore, Betancourt was excessively vain and hypocritical. He had many opportunities to learn about the situation in Venezuela. As a young man he was a member of the Politburo of the Communist Party of Costa Rica. He had a strong grasp of Latin American history and the role of imperialism, of poverty rates, and the ruthless plundering of natural resources in South America. He could not ignore that in a vastly rich country such as Venezuela, the majority of the people lived in extreme poverty. The archival footage is irrefutable proof of that reality of life.

As Chavez has explained many times, for more than half a century Venezuela was the world’s major oil exporter. At the beginning of the 20th century, European and Yankee warships intervened to support an illegal and tyrannical government that handed the country over to foreign monopolies. It is well known that incalculable funds flowed out of Venezuela to swell the wealth of monopolies and the Venezuelan oligarchy.

I remember when I visited Venezuela for the first time —after the triumph of the Revolution, to give thanks for the support and friendliness afforded to our struggle—, oil was worth barely two dollars a barrel.

Afterwards when I went to Venezuela to take part in the swearing-in ceremony for Chavez, the day he took an oath on the “dying constitution” held by Calderas, oil was worth seven dollars a barrel, despite 40 years having passed since my first visit and almost 30 years since the “distinguished” Richard Nixon had cancelled the direct convertibility of the United States dollar to gold and the US began to buy the world with pieces of paper. For a century, Venezuela was a supplier of cheap fuel to the empire’s economy and a net exporter of capital to developed and rich countries.

Why did these repugnant situations dominate for more than a century?

Latin American Armed Forces’ officials went to their privileged schools in the United States, where the Olympic champions of democracies gave them special courses on maintaining imperialist and bourgeois order. Coups d’état were always welcomed if their objective was to “defend democracies,” safeguarding and guaranteeing this repugnant system, in league with the oligarchies. Whether voters knew how to read and write, whether they had homes, employment, medical services and education were unimportant as long as the sacred right to property was maintained. Chavez brilliantly explains this situation. No one knows as well as him what happened in our countries.

Even worse was that the sophisticated nature of weapons, the complex workings and use of modern armaments that require years of learning, the training of highly qualified specialists, and the almost prohibitive cost of such weapons for the weak economies of the continent created a very strong mechanism of subordination and dependence. The US Government, employing mechanisms that did not require prior consultation with the other governments, set guidelines and policies for the military. The most sophisticated techniques of torture were passed on to the so-called security agencies to interrogate those who rebelled against the dirty and repugnant system of hunger and exploitation.

Despite all this, many honest officials, tired of so many indignations, bravely attempted to eradicate that embarrassing treason against the history of our independence struggles.

In Argentina, military official Juan Domingo Peron was able to design an independent and worker-based policy in his country. A bloody military coup overthrew him, expelled him from his country, and kept him in exile from 1955 to 1973. Years later, under the aegis of the Yankees, they once again attacked the government, murdering, torturing and disappearing tens of thousands of Argentines. They were not even able to defend the country during the colonial war that England carried out against Argentina with the conspiratorial support of the United States and henchman Augusto Pinochet with his cohort of fascists officers trained at the School of the Americas.

In Santo Domingo, Colonel Francisco Caamaño Deño; in Peru, General Velazco Alvarado; in Panama, General Omar Torrijos; and in other countries captains and officers who gave their lives anonymously were the antithesis of the traitorous behavior embodied by Somoza, Trujillo, Stroessner and the cruel tyrannies in Uruguay, El Salvador and other countries in Central and South America. The revolutionary military personnel did not expound elaborate theories, nor was this to be expected. They were not academicians educated in political science, but rather men with a sense of honor who loved their country.

But how far can honest men —who deplore injustice and crime— go along the path of revolution?

Venezuela is an outstanding example of the theoretical and practical role that the military can play in the revolutionary struggle for the independence of our peoples, as they did two centuries ago under the brilliant leadership of Simon Bolivar…

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article30433.htm

Iranian Female Ninjas!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mHlEX2yFxkU#!

 

Arabian Sights
gzahran@wanadoo.fr
To subscribe/unsubscribe send
a blank message with the appropriate
request in the subject window. Feel free to

Arabian Sights…..

No Comments

Arabian Sights…..

Chavez supports Russia/China veto on UN Syrian resolution as “very positive

 

“We think that is very positive, we join the veto”…Chavez recalled the case of Libya and criticized the powers world ‘they invade, bomb, destroy a country, kill its President and as if nothing had happened’.

“The United States and its European allies are intensifying their offensive against Syria, infiltrating terrorists to generate violence, bloodshed and death, just like they did in Libya at the beginning of this year…They managed with bombs not only to topple the Libyan government but to destroy that country and assassinate Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.. and now they are taking aim at Syria,”

 

http://www.nixguy.com/commended-veto-of-russia-and-china-to-syria-chavez.html

http://www.dp-news.com/en/detail.aspx?articleid=109001

 

The US/West-behind Anti-Putin Demos Overturn by The Huge Pro-Putin Demos

Among the speakers, there was flamboyant Prokhanov, a prolific writer and chief editor of the Zavtra newspaper, main organ of the Brown-Red coalition.

He placed Russia as the next on the line of the imperialist attack, after Libya, Syria and Iran. He fully supported the Russian veto in the Security Council, but he would like to see more direct Russian support for Syria and Iran, more friendship with China. He is a frequent traveller to Syria and Iran, is a great friend of Palestine, published a book glorifying Hamas and supporting Hezbollah.

An Orthodox Christian and a unrepentant Soviet-style Communist, Stalin admirer, he was very critical of Putin and his compromises. Fear and loathing of the Orange revolution mobilised him and his numerous followers to the demo.

Actually, it was the first time since Yeltsin shelled the Parliament in 1993 with the US blessing, that this hard core of Russian political life emerged and was allowed by the Putin’s government to show its strength.

There were other speakers, notably Maxim Shevchenko, a popular presenter on state TV, known for his sympathy to the Muslims and his staunch anti-Zionist stand; Alexander Dugin, “the Russian Heidegger”, a controversial philosopher from Moscow State University, the founder of the Eurasian movement and a friend of the European anti-American non-racist New Right. They were fiery and outspoken, not so much for Putin but surely against his liberal “orange” opponents…

The Russians are afraid of “orange” revolutions, as arranged by your friendly National Endowment for Democracy and other tools of the State Department. Many, perhaps a majority of the Hill demonstrators were afraid of a replay of the Nineties, or of Tahrir, and they were happy to support Putin as a symbol of stability…

The Communists stayed away from both demos. They are busy building up the party chairman Gennady Zuganov as a credible alternative to Putin in the forthcoming elections, so they did not want to be seen as supporting Putin. It is possible that the elections will run in two stages, and then it will be Zuganov vs. Putin. For pro-Western forces in Moscow, that will be a difficult choice: they will have to decide whom do they hate more: Putin or Communists? …

In order to stabilize his hold on power, Putin must reinstall respect and fear, and this can be done by initiating corruption trials against his subordinates – or by strong stand against the U.S. plans regarding Iran and Syria.

The visiting Russian warships in the Syrian port of Tartus and delivery of shore-to-ship missiles imply that Putin does not intend to act like a lame duck. CP …

Very Informative Video

 

“Jesus was the first communist”

Gennady Zyuganov

Leader of The Russian Communist Party

Despite attempts to erase vestiges of the Soviet past, the Communist Party in Russia still has support. On the anniversary of the birth of its founder, Vladimir Lenin, RT talks to its current leader, Gennady Zyuganov

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=IatoF2H-pnQ

 

Any US aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran will precipitate the demise of the US empire

Alexander Prokhanov

Any US aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran will precipitate the demise of the US empire, a senior Russian political analyst tells Press TV.

The United States dreads to engage in an act of aggression against the Islamic Republic as Iran is a leading hub of anti-Western revolutions and a key source of Islamic Awakening that will spell doom for America, said Alexander Prokhanov in a recent interview with Press TV.

Commenting on recent threats made by the United States and the Israeli regime against Iran, the Russian analyst said that Washington is fearful of Tehran’s growing momentum in the international arena and struggles to curb Iran’s clout by providing “an excess of pretexts and provocations.”

“This force (Iran’s Islamic Revolution) can, in the short or long run, bring about the demise of the US empire. That’s why the United States is fending for itself, fearing that the Islamic Republic might serve as a model for other nations to amalgamate,” considering that Iran opposes the US establishment, Prokhanov noted.

His remarks come in the wake of the latest anti-Iran publicity campaign by Washington and Tel Aviv in which the duo have once again threatened Tehran with the “option” of a military strike, based on their rhetorical allegation that Iran’s nuclear work may consist of a covert military diversion.

Iran, however, has persistently argued that it has the right to develop and acquire nuclear technology for peaceful purposes as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and a long-time member of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Prokhanov further touched upon Iran’s nuclear issue and dismissed US-led Western allegations over the case, saying that in his discussions with Russian nuclear experts operating in Iran, the experts have repeatedly emphasized the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program.

The Israeli regime, however, is widely believed to possess over 200 atomic warheads and does not allow any inspection of its controversial nuclear program by international inspectors. Moreover, the Israeli regime has refused to join the International Atomic Energy Agency or the Nuclear non-Proliferation Treaty, boasting its public policy of “nuclear ambiguity.”

The US and its European allies have never raised any concerns about Israel’s highly suspected atomic warheads and nuclear program and refuse to address growing international calls to look into the matter.

http://www.hungarianambiance.com/2011/11/alexander-prokhanov-iran-attack-will.html

Maxim Shevchenko: “I will advocate for the Palestinian cause until I die.”

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW

Maxim Shevchenko is an immensely well-respected editor, journalist and presenter on television and radio in Russia. He is a staunch advocate of the Palestinian cause, a member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation and he is also one of the latest targets of the pro-Israel Lobby.

Hanan Chehata – You are an outspoken supporter of Palestine and have publicly criticised Israel for its human rights abuses against the Palestinian people. When did your support for Palestine begin and why?

Maxim Shevchenko - I began to support the Palestinian people as a Soviet teenager in 1982. There were a lot of wounded Palestinian fighters from Beirut in Moscow at the time. I casually happened to meet some of them. Talks with these people amazed me. They were the same age as me but they had been real fighters for freedom and justice.

At the same time I was studying at school. A lot of my schoolmates planned to go to live in Israel. They said a lot of bad things about Palestinians but they had never been to Palestine or had even met a Palestinian.

I could not understand why people that had such a bad attitude towards Palestine planned to live there while simultaneously Palestinians were forced to be exiles without a Motherland. I failed to understand why my schoolmates, who were born in Moscow, planned to live in Palestine. It seemed to me that that was a huge injustice.
HC – Over 1 million Russians live in Israel. Does this mean that there is a lot of support for Israel among the general population of Russia; more so than for Palestine?

MS – They are not Russians – they are Zionists. They are connected with Russia only by language. All other feelings that they have towards Russia are hostile. At the same time the Russian language that they speak gives them the right to call themselves Russians – this is a lie.

Today Russian speaking Zionists view Russia as a place where they can make money, like a colony for goods of their market. Thanks to corruption they have more possibilities to trade their fruits and vegetables that are grown on occupied territories here.

Russian speaking Zionists support ultra-right groups of racists and fascists. They create an anti-Palestinian and anti-Muslim mood in Russia.

Today the struggle for public opinion in Russia is the most important goal of the struggle for Palestine. It is a big mistake not to understand this but sometimes it seems that even some Palestinians do not understand it.
HC – How powerful is the Israel lobby in Russia and how does it manifest itself?

MS – The Israel lobby is very powerful in Russia. It consists of hundreds of politicians, journalists and secret service officers, businessmen and financial circles that transfer money outside Russia through offshore banks. They have corrupted a lot of people in positions of authority. The Russian Jewish Congress is only the top of the iceberg.

The influence of the Zionist lobby in Russia is huge. However, not everyone subscribes to their views. It is important to also remember that there is a huge difference between Jews and Zionists. Look at Jewish people like Hedy Epstein, for example. She is a holocaust survivor and a participant of the Nuremberg process. She is 87 years old and yet she is one of the key activists leading others in the fight for peace and justice for Palestinians.
HC – Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has invited members of Hamas to Russia before. What is the status of Hamas in Russia? Is it seen as a terrorist organisation or as a legitimate political party?

MS – Hamas is not considered to be a terrorist organization in Russia despite the pressure of the Zionist lobby. Now the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Russia has organized ties with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Palestinians have a great deal of support from Muslims in Russia – which is heading towards 20% of the Russian population. Parties on the Left also support Palestinians including the Communist party – it is about 25% of Russians. These are activists. I think that on the whole more than 90% of Russian people support Palestinians.
HC – Russia is set to support the recognition of Palestine as an independent state at the UN General Assembly in September. What is Russia’s official position on the Palestine-Israel conflict? Does the government align itself more with one side than the other and if so, why?

MS – Russia wants to be above the conflict. Russia supports Palestine but it does not speak against Israel.  Russia is for peace in the region and wants peaceful decision for both sides. Russia is against any kind of segregation and supports democracy in the Holy land.
HC – Russia is a member of the Quartet (other members being the EU, UN and USA). How effective do you feel the Quartet is being in bringing balance and peace to the Palestine- Israel conflict and how do you view Russia’s role in the Quartet?

MS – We are the only country in the Quartet that has connections to all sides – with Hamas, with Fatah and with the Zionists. It makes the role of Russia very strong. But Russia, at the same time, possesses less political power in comparison to the USA.
HC – You have stated that you have had death threats publicly issued against you by the former President of the Jewish Congress of Russia. Can you tell us why this came about and what exactly happened?

MS – This is a common practice of Zionists – I mean death threats, kidnapping and killings. Zionist secret services are terrorist organizations, they kill people all over the world and they kidnap people as has happened in Ukraine with the Palestinian engineer. That is why I take very seriously death threats I have received from people like Yevgeny Satanovsky, former President of the Russian Jewish Congress. The first time he threatened me he told my wife on the Voice of America that he wanted to kill me – it was said publicly. In May Satanovsky repeat his threat in the conference “20 years after the USSR”. He openly said: “If the Civil war in Russia will start the first man I will kill will be Maxim Shevchenko”. There was no reaction from the Russian Jewish Congress to this scandal.

HC – Will you continue to advocate for the Palestinian cause or have the threats against you made you wary of publicly supporting their cause.

MS – I will advocate for the Palestinian cause until justice comes to Palestine or until I die.

http://www.middleeastmonitor.org.uk/resources/interviews/2736-maxim-shevchenko-qi-will-advocate-for-the-palestinian-cause-until-i-dieq

 

 

Vitaly Churkin: Russia is a friend of the Arab world

 

In a surprise news conference Tuesday morning at the United Nations headquarters in New York Vitaly Churkin, the U.N. Ambassador to Russia, denied reports that have spurred over the Internet regarding a verbal altercation that took place during last weekend’s deliberations over Syria in the Security Council.

During the meeting on Saturday, just moments before the latest resolution on Syria was put to a vote, several Arab and European news agencies reported that bin Jassim, Qatar’s Prime Minister, allegedly addressed Churkin at the meeting by saying “I warn Russia: if it doesn’t abstain from vetoing and doesn’t support the U.N. decision, it will lose all Arab Nations”. The same incident news sources such as Algeria-isp.com report that Churkin responded by saying “You speak to me again in that tone and Qatar won’t live long enough to see tomorrow”.

During Tuesday’s press conference Mr. Churkin denied that such a conversation took place. “According to those reports they give some rather graphic details of the rude things I said to Prime Minister of Qatar and threats I’ve made, etc. I’ve been dealing with the media for over a quarter of a century, and I’ve not said anything like that. There is disinformation. There are lies, there are blatant lies. One has to come up with some different stronger description in order to characterize this kind of a thing. To use threats is really not my style and there was no even a hint of any threat, intimidation, rudeness from me or from the Prime Minister of Qatar for that matter in those conversations. So, I am really sorry that I have to take time in order to address this”.

Churkin believes that someone is trying really hard to taint Arab-Russian relations. The Russian Ambassador went on to say he wouldn’t have been surprised if that someone was from the outside, but it would be upsetting if that someone was from the Arab world itself.

“If it’s somebody working from the outside, I could understand that. If it’s somebody who is really coming form the Arab world, I think, there is a very good Russian saying, which they, I think, should keep in mind, those in the Arab world, who may be upset about our positions in this case taken on Syria. In my translation into English it would come out like this ‘Don’t spit into a well, you may well need it for a drink of water’. So, our friends and people who do not regard themselves as friends in the Arab world should remember that Russia is an extremely serious geopolitical reality, that Russia has been for decades a friend of the Arab world, Russia is a friend of the Arab world”.

english.ruvr.ru/2012/02/08/65591647.html

Communism back in fashion

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-vYM5Yrrlk&feature=relmfu

 

“I wish the US was a communist country

Amiri Baraka

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rEBmk6-Gh-8&feature=relmfu

 

 

Arabian Sights
gzahran@wanadoo.fr
To subscribe/unsubscribe send
a blank message with the appropriate
request in the subject window. Feel free to
forward for information and educational
purposes with Signature intact, please

Russia and China Veto Syria Resolution

No Comments

Russia and China Veto Syria Resolution

 

by Stephen Lendman

 

Shortly before 1PM EST, Reuters headlined, “Russia, China veto UN resolution telling Assad to quit,” saying:

 

The diplomatic “setback” came the day after “Syrian opposition (elements) accused Assad’s forces of killing hundreds of people (in) Homs, the bloodiest night in the 11 months of upheaval in the pivotal Arab country.”

 

Like other pro-Western media, Reuters pointed fingers the wrong way. Throughout the conflict, Assad was blamed for Western-backed externally generated violence. In fact, he’s more victim than villain, but don’t expect media scoundrels to explain.

 

Shortly before the Security Council vote, Obama called the Homs violence “unspeakable,” demanded Assad step down immediately, and urged Security Council action against his “relentless brutality.”

 

His public statement falsely claimed:

 

“Yesterday the Syrian government murdered hundreds of Syrian citizens, including women and children, in Homs through shelling and other indiscriminate violence, and Syrian forces continue to prevent hundreds of injured civilians from seeking medical help.”

 

“Any government that brutalizes and massacres its people does not deserve to govern.”

 

Since 1991 alone, Obama, Bush I and II, as well as Clinton, murdered millions of Iraqis, Serbians, Kosovars, Afghans, Libyans, Somalis, Yemenis, and many others ruthlessly and maliciously.

 

Today, Obama supports atrocities in Bahrain, Yemen, Somalia, Colombia, Saudi Arabia, and elsewhere, as well as Israel’s decades-long war on Palestine. Major media scoundrels ignore them. Instead, they cheerlead imperial US wars. Power takes precedence over truth and full disclosure.

 

John Pilger once called journalism the first casualty of war, adding:

 

“Not only that: it has become a weapon of war, a virulent censorship (and deception) that goes unrecognized in the United States, Britain and other democracies; censorship by omission, whose power is such that, in war, it can mean the difference between life and death for people in faraway countries….”

 

In their book titled, “Guardians of Power,” Davids Edwards and Cromwell explained why today’s media are in crisis, putting free societies at risk. It’s because fiction substitutes for fact. News is carefully filtered, dissent marginalized, and supporting wealth and power replaces full and accurate reporting.

 

For over a century, The New York Times notoriously served as America’s lead print propaganda instrument. On February 4, it headlined, “Russia and China Block UN Action on Syrian Crisis,” saying:

 

Hours before the Saturday Security Council vote, “the Syrian military attack the ravaged city of Homs in what opposition leaders described as the bloodiest government assault” so far.

 

Hours later, “(t)he Security Council voted 13 to 2 in favor of a resolution backing an Arab League peace plan for Syria, but the measure was blocked by Russia and China (as a) potential violation of Syria’s sovereignty.”

 

In fact, calling for “further measures” if Assad failed to comply gave Washington and rogue partners enormous wiggle room for military intervention. It also largely pointed fingers one way, absolving Western-backed insurgents.

 

Current Security Council members include the five permanent members plus Azerbajan, Colombia, Germany, Guatemala, India, Morocco, Pakistan, Portugal, South Africa and Togo.

 

On February 4, Russia Today (RT.com) reported:

 

“Russia and China were the only permanent Security Council members opposing the draft, reminding others that it was not their place to intervene in another country’s domestic affairs.”

 

Under international law, it’s illegal. Russia’s UN envoy Vitaly Churkin said:

 

“The co-sponsors of the resolution have not, in the wording of the draft, taken into account that the Syrian opposition must distance itself from extremist groups committing acts of violence or called on states with the ability to use their influence to prevent such acts.”

 

As a result, “(t)he Russian delegation was forced to vote against this draft resolution. We seriously regret this outcome of our joint work.”

 

Attending a Munich security conference, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov diplomatically condemned the resolution for making false accusations and “taking sides in a civil war.”

 

In response, US envoy Susan Rice said she was “disgusted” by vetoes “prop(ping) up desperate dictators.” French ambassador Gerard Araud said “history will judge (Assad supporters) harshly.”

 

In Munich, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, a notorious war goddess, said, “To block this resolution is to bear the responsibility for the horrors on the ground in Syria.”

 

Throughout his tenure as UN Secretary-General, Kofi Annan was a notorious imperial tool. So is Ban Ki-moon. He called vetoing the Security Council resolution “a great disappointment to the people of Syria and the Middle East, and to all supporters of democracy and human rights.”

 

He said doing so “undermines the role of the United Nations and the international community in this period when the Syrian authorities must hear a unified voice calling for an immediate end to its violence against the Syrian people.”

 

Ban serves at the behest of Washington. He hasn’t disappointed supporting years of imperial crimes, as well as Israel’s against Palestine. No wonder Gazans pelted him with shoes during his February 2 visit.

 

Human Rights Watch (HRW) UN director Philippe Bolopion called last October’s vetos by Moscow and Beijing “irresponsible,” but today, “after weeks of Russian diplomatic game-playing and in the middle of a bloodbath in Homs, they are simply incendiary.”

 

More often than not, HRW speaks for power, not human rights. Amnesty International also falls far short of its founding principles. Urging Russia’s anti-Assad support, it called on Moscow to back Security Council actions against him instead of blaming perpetrators, not victims. It also falsely accused Gaddafi of Western-backed crimes. Libya’s now ravaged. Will Syria be next? Veto power does little to stop it.

 

A Final Comment

 

On Press TV Saturday, this writer said Washington prefers diplomatic cover for planned aggression. However, with or without it, imperial wars aren’t deterred. In 1999, it bypassed Security Council approval against Serbia/Kosovo. It claimed NATO authorization alone mattered.

 

Obama plans regime change in Syria and Iran. As a result, expect a similar scenario to unfold.

 

Perhaps a false flag incident will precipitate conflict. What Washington wants, it gets, using whatever pretext fits the plan.

 

With major media support, getting away with murder is simple as bombs away. Expect it.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

America’s Origins of Terror: An Often Unspoken History

No Comments

America’s Origins of Terror: An Often Unspoken History

By Solomon Comissiong

The words “terror”, “terrorist” and “terrorism” seemed to take on new meaning after the tragedy that occurred on September 11, 2001—a day that will live on in infamy. However, if one did not know better, you might think that the aforementioned words failed to exist prior to 9/11. Unfortunately, due to a combination of factors, many Americans behave as if these words, and their trepid meaning, were unfamiliar inside America. Mass racially motivated propaganda has juxtaposed the word “terrorist” next to that of a Muslim person of color. Unfortunately for countless Indigenous people and Africans, who were mass murdered on “American” soil—they came to fully understand terror in some of the worst possible ways. The face of their terror was white and originated throughout Europe.

Terror on American soil has existed for hundreds of years, dating back to the arrival of ill intentioned invaders from Europe. These invaders/illegal aliens (commonly mislabeled as ‘settlers’) came to a land that was foreign to them in innumerable aspects. It was prosperous, abundant with resources, communal and egalitarian. It was only a “New World” to their limited way of seeing the world. Turtle Island (North America) had been inhabited by indigenous people for tens of thousands of years. These people lived in prosperous communal settings where private land ownership was quite literally a foreign concept. They respected the earth/nature (and the animals), which they used to feed, clothe, and shelter their communities. Despite living in lands abundant with resources they never over consumed. In 2012 over-consumption is synonymous with American society.  In essence, these people lived in a way that was in balance with nature itself. Unfortunately, with the arrival of scores of European invaders, the prosperity they enjoyed would soon come to a “terrifying” end.

Sharing land that was not theirs was an unacceptable option for these cretins from Europe—they rejected the indigenous people’s hospitality, opting for genocide instead. It was not long before the white man began a killing spree that would have made Hitler blush. Hitler would have felt compelled to take copious notes on the effectiveness, diversity, and sheer barbarity of their murderous ways. Within years to decades many native communities were on the verge of extinction. The white man spared no one, killing man, woman, the elderly and children. They sometimes would burn them alive in their homes, other times decapitating them—subsequently placing their severed heads on poles to send doomsday messages to other native peoples. Giving the native peoples blankets infected with small pox (a disease foreign to the natives and therefore no immunity) was one of the earliest forms of biological warfare. Biological warfare is something future generations of Euro-Americans would experiment with, on the likes of Africans/blacks (Tuskegee Experiment) and Central Americans (Guatemala)—to name couple of well known blatant examples. Now in 2012 the decedents of the indigenous of “America” are decimated in sheer numbers and relegated to impoverished reservations, on land that was their ancestors. If this historical snapshot detailing the multitude of atrocities unleashed on these once prosperous people is not terrorism, this author does not comprehend the meaning of this word.

European terrorism had no boundaries when it came to the non-white people of the world. They showered hundreds of years of brutality and murder upon the Africans they kidnapped and brought to the so-called “new world”. Millions upon millions were tortured and killed on the boat rides from hell, across the Atlantic Ocean. Those who survived the several months long trips, stacked upon one another like sardines and forced to defecate upon themselves, were forced to work  in hellish conditions by shiftless amoral “people”. As if working up to 16-18 hour days in the blazing hot southern sun (and muggy evenings) was not enough—these European monsters beat, raped, mutilated and mass murdered countless enslaved Africans. The brutality they carried out upon the Africans had an array of vile forms. Some Africans were hunted down like dogs and then lynched—-all the way in to the middle of the 20th century. This unfortunately was not half of this reprehensible experience. These barbarians would often slowly burn the African/black people to death as they mutilated their bodies, all the while showcasing these events in front of thousands of people, including their wives and children. The kind of person that could repeatedly carry out these kinds of atrocities, let alone in front of children, is soulless and riddled with pure evil. They were not only terrorists, they were devilish.

These European serial murderers were proud of the brutal campaigns of death and mutilation they carried out—so much so that they routinely took pictures of the charred lynched bodies and sold them, by the tens of thousands, as postcards. They not only terrorized and mass murdered, they had no remorse for their crimes against humanity. Euro-Americans carried out their genocide of Africans in America from the 1600s until well in to the 20th century. However, many would contest that this genocide continues today in the form of community-wide police orchestrated brutality and terror.  When looking at the cases of people like Sean Bell and Oscar Grant, it is hard to argue against that valid assertion. And the institution of slavery has taken upon another name, in the form of Mass Incarceration/Prison Industrial Complex. The massive prison warehousing of African/black people is big business within the white settler state now known as America.

I have not even begun to scratch the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Euro-American atrocities carried out upon people of color, within, and outside of the stolen US borders. I have not touched upon the mass rapes of African and indigenous women. I have not detailed how they stole babies and broke up families, all in the name of slavery. Most children were destined for a life of brutal servitude, beatings and possible murder. And I have not yet to discuss how Africans were renamed, prevented from being literate, and force fed Christianity (as a means of pacification). These are all facts that no honest historian can deny. This was also terror by any description.

Despite what masses of mentally programmed Americans may believe, the fact remains that Euro-American terror continues to inflict damage—throughout the globe. Mass indiscriminate bombings in places like Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq has taken the lives of (at least) hundreds of thousands of civilians. This is terror, in the raw. This is terror similar to that which was carried out on 9/11, except on a much larger scale. There is little difference. Knowingly killing masses of civilians, in an effort to intimidate and accomplish an imperialist end game, is terrorism—plain and simple. Those civilians (men, women, and children) had nothing to do with the tragic events of 9/11; however that mattered little to the US government, and much of its populous. Many Americans wanted blood, they wanted revenge—-and it did not matter whose blood it was so long as it came from people thousands of miles away. In some sadistic way, it made them feel better knowing others had died. Little time was spent reflecting on the fact that the majority of people killed in places like Iraq, were in fact, too, civilians. These actions are terror just as the lynching of African/black people in the United States.

One can attempt to rename terror all they want, however it does not escape the fact that it is terror, murder, and brutality. If most Americans understood this or recognized these truths, they, too, would know that some of the planet’s worst atrocities have been committed by their own government. The US, particularly Euro-Americans, have inflicted vicious acts of terror, not only on people within this country, but throughout the world. Mass propaganda and indoctrination has conveniently blinded most Americans of these facts. This social myopia makes it all the more difficult for a better, more humane, world to be envisioned. And without a critical mass of social justice visionaries, the quest for social justice (and peace) become even more burdensome to social activists whose work remains critically vital.

Terror did not begin with the catastrophic events of 9/11. Terror began long before that infamous day in history. Americans, especially those of European decent need never to make blatantly false racist generalizations stating that all terrorists are Muslim, unless they willing to discuss the terrorist acts their ancestors, and government, have committed. Their crimes of terror are responsible for taking the lives of countless people—-well into the tens of millions (conservatively). Why doesn’t America mourn the lives of the masses of slain Iraqi, Pakistani, and Afghans, just as they do Americans who lost their lives on 9/11? Most Americans don’t mourn them because they have been programmed how to think and feel. They don’t see these people as fellow human beings, similar to themselves. This hollow thought process allows the globally deleterious actions of the US government from ever being challenged by a critical mass of its own citizens. Americans’ indifference is essential to the sustaining of destructive US foreign policy. America, as a nation, may never repent for its terrorist crimes against humanity, however if it ever does—it will be the very first crucial step towards building a much better global society. Until that happens the work of social justice surgeons remains critical—this is a socially sick society in desperate need of repair. A world of Peace, Justice, Equality and Prosperity depend upon it.

Solomon Comissiong is an educator, community activist, author, public speaker and the host of the Your World News media collective (www.yourworldnews.org). He can be reached at: solo@yourworldnews.org

Blue Taste Theme created by Jabox