Archive

For December, 2011

State of Human Rights in Israel

No Comments

State of Human Rights in Israel – by Stephen Lendman

 

Annually, the State Department publishes human rights reports for over 190 countries. Its latest April 8, 2011 Israel assessment noted serious human rights abuses, including:

 

(1) numerous NGO complaints about torture and other abuses in Gaza and the West Bank.

 

(2) Israel’s High Court of Justice (HCJ) ruling against painful shackling. At issue is tightening restraints to inflict pain.

 

In Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Prime Minister, former HCJ President Aaron Barak said:

 

“A reasonable interrogation is an interrogation without torture, without cruel or inhuman treatment of the interrogee, and without a humiliating attitude thereto.”

 

“It is forbidden to use brutal and inhuman measures during the course of the interrogation.”

 

“Painful cuffing is a prohibited action. Moreover: other means exist to prevent escape from lawful custody or to protect the interrogators which do not involve pain and suffering to the interrogee.”

 

(3) the UN fact finding commission finding that Israeli security forces “arbitrarily” killed nine Mavi Marmara humanitarian activists.

 

(4) targeted assassinations.

 

(5) whitewashed investigations, unaccountability, and few prosecutions of Israelis involved in killings and other human rights abuses.

 

(6) “unnatural deaths” in prisons.

 

(7) prison “deficiencies,” including sub-standard isolation cells.

 

(8) detentions without charge up to six months, “renewable indefinitely.”

 

(9) arrests for “security reasons,” “even when the accused posed no clear danger.”

 

(10) “denial of fair public trial(s).”

 

(11) “arbitrary interference with privacy, family, home or correspondence.”

 

(12) free expression and press restrictions, including prohibiting journalists from entering Gaza; requiring media organizations “submit to military censors any material relating to specific military issues” or strategic ones; impeding free assembly, association, and movement; as well as other civil liberty violations.

 

(13) discrimination against citizens and residents of Arab origin.

 

(14) human rights violations against refugees and asylum seekers with regard to status, social rights, safety, and “hot return” policy.

 

Association for Civil Rights in Israel Annual Human Rights Report

 

Annually, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI) publishes its “State of Human Rights – Situation.” For 2011, it documents “grave violations of rights in Israel’s prisons and describes a rising trend of restrictions of liberty” overall, including:

  • freedom of expression;

 

  • freedom of political activity; and

 

  • freedom of thought and opinion.

 

It also covers last summer’s mass social rights protests, infringing protesters’ freedom of expression, and few results so far achieved.

 

According to ACRI’s Executive Director, Hagai El-Ad:

 

“With this report, ACRI displays the reality of human rights issues: when some of us are less equal than others – none of us are equal. When freedom of expression is under threat – we are all in danger.”

 

“In the face of threats to democracy in Israel, we saw this past summer how more and more citizens demand to become active partners in designing reality, in order to realize human rights and social justice in Israel. We hope that the Situation Report will raise public debate and help in bringing the desired change(s).”

 

Part I discusses deplorable conditions in Israeli prisons. No one’s addressing them or efforts to safeguard prisoner dignity and basic rights.

 

Palestinians, Israeli Arabs, refugees, asylum seekers, and migrant workers are especially affected. Months or years in prison usually follow arrests. It’s the rule, not the exception, including for many uncharged.

 

Arresting minors is also commonplace, despite international law requiring prosecutions and imprisonment used only as a last resort.

 

In Occupied Palestine, Israel’s permit system, militarized presence, checkpoints, Separation Wall, Jews only roads, and other barriers severely restrict free movement. Gaza remains besieged. Jordan Valley residents are disconnected from other West Bank communities, and East Jerusalemites face dispossessions to entirely Judaize the city.

 

Tactics employed against basic freedoms have a chilling effect overall. They undermine popular efforts and motivation to hold free discussions about fundamental human and civil rights.

 

Democracies can’t exist without them. Nor when citizens can’t participate actively and be able to influence policies.

 

Summer 2011 social justice protests united dissimilar groups, including Arabs and Jews, workers and unemployed, poor and middle class, young and old, men and women, and migrants and refugees among others. Success remains elusive.

 

However, a new awareness permeated Israeli society. People know change demands social activism. Moreover, when marginalized groups are harmed, everyone’s affected.

 

Part II covers imprisoning the spirit, including rights violations in the broadest sense. Violence, restrictions, and other crackdowns diminish democratic discourse. Unidentified masked police violate Israeli law.

 

Requiring released demonstrators pledge no further protests stifles free expression. So does harassing and threatening them in “warning talks.”

 

In Occupied Palestine, demonstrations are prohibited. Violence confronts participants. Injuries, arrests and at times deaths follow.

 

Anti-democratic legislation’s been passed. More’s coming. Individual liberties are threatened, including those of minorities. Affected groups include those named above and anyone criticizing government policies, including Jews.

 

In Part III, social rights are discussed. Israelis demand. Netanyahu’s government turns a deaf ear. Socioeconomic gaps follow years of degrading rights. Ethnic, national and cultural minorities are especially affected. So are all Israelis in areas of healthcare, education, housing, employment and welfare.

 

ACRI endorses a new Basic Law: Social Rights to enshrine fundamental rights and dignified living for all. Israel wants none of it, serving the same corporate interests as in America, Europe, and elsewhere.

 

A Final Comment

 

Religious extremism and violence threaten all Israelis. On December 27, thousands protested against gender segregation near Beit Shemesh’s Orot girl’s school. Ultra-orthodox Haredi extremists were involved.

 

Israel’s Channel 2 broadcast the plight of eight-year old Na’ama Margolese. Daily to and from school, she faces Haredi abuse. She’s young, cursed, spat on, and bewildered about what’s happening.

 

On December 26, Haredim clashed with police and TV news crews. Arrests and detentions followed. Earlier on Christmas day, a Channel 10 TV news team was targeted. An hour later, Channel 2 personnel were assaulted with eggs, and a videographer attacked.

 

Haredim also pelted police with rocks. Rising tensions brought calls for Beit Shemesh’s mayor to resign. He refused but opposes religious extremism. Saying he’ll “act decisively against anyone who lifts a hand on children,” he stopped short of adding more.

 

On December 28, a Haaretz editorial headlined, “Religious extremists threaten democracy in Israel,” saying:

 

Incidents like in Beit Shemesh “should set off major alarm bells.” Public outrage massed against them on Tuesday and “the enormous threat” they represent. Everyone’s affected.

 

Haredim “rioters….are criminals in every sense of the word. They cannot hide behind their religious worldview, behind their rabbis’ rulings on matters of halakha (Judaic law). Nor can they hide behind the argument (even though correct) that government authorities have preferred to ignore” their growing violence and let them “terrorize the city’s residents and turn them into defenseless hostages.”

 

Most Israelis want no part of enforcing halakha to the exclusion of secular rights. They want freedom to live as they choose within the law. Authorities must use it against Haredim and their rabbis “who encourage and incite them to run wild.”

 

They endanger everyone. So do US Christian fascists. They want their extremist dogma forced on everyone. Like Haredim, it includes male gender dominance, disdain for non-believers, opposition to free thought, and everyone against their views.

 

Political, religious, and other extremists threaten freedom everywhere. They dominate Israel’s Knesset and political Washington dangerously.

 

Their out-of-control agenda puts humanity at risk. Stopping them is job one.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Ron Paul’s Anti-Progressive Agenda

No Comments

Ron Paul’s Anti-Progressive Agenda - by Stephen Lendman

 

Compared to a rogue’s gallery of Republican aspirants, supporters claim Paul looks good by comparison. Look again and think carefully about America in his hands.

 

True enough, he wants the Federal Reserve abolished. He calls it “dishonest, immoral, unconstitutional,” and America’s “great(est) threat to….security and prosperity.”

 

“Out-of-control (and) secretive, (it) pumps money into the economy whenever it chooses and makes secret deals with Wall Street executives, foreign central banks, and other politically-connected insiders without any significant oversight from Congress.”

 

Several times in Congress he introduced the Federal Reserve Abolition Act. Without co-sponsors, no further action followed.

 

Yet, restoring sound money and producing growth requires Fed abolition. Money power in private hands is scandalous. Returning it to public hands where it belongs is essential; namely, the US Treasury as the Constitution’s Article I, Section 8 mandates.

 

Wanting America’s wealth used for productive growth, Paul opposes squandering it on imperial wars. At the same time, his hard-right world view stops short of criticizing US imperialism and endorsing peace, despite saying:

 

“We can no longer afford to police the world, in terms of both dollars and American lives. We will destroy ourselves if we do not stop, build a strong national defense at home, and focus on commerce with the world instead of empire.”

 

Nonetheless, he backed attacking Afghanistan, no matter its illegality. However, he strongly opposed war on Libya, saying:

 

“The current situation may be a short-term victory for empire, but it is a loss for our American Republic.”

 

He also called Washington’s involvement “unconstitutional,” but stopped short of including all US post-WW II wars. Only Congress, not presidents, can declare war under UN Charter provisions. None were since December 8, 1941.

 

Addressing the House in October 2002, Paul’s main opposition to attacking Iraq was over ceding congressional power to Bush. It was also about giving UN members say over US foreign interventions and undermining national defense by costly spending and overstretching US military forces.

 

Rather than UN resolutions, he “like(s) it more when the president speaks about unilateralism and national security interests.” When America “depends on the UN for our instructions, we end up in no-win wars.”

 

Paul left international law unexplained. Supporting congressional power on war, not the executive, he omitted under what conditions belligerence by one state against another is justified.

 

UN Charter power is inviolate. Article 2(3) and Article 33(1) require peaceful settlement of international disputes. Article 2(4) prohibits force or its threatened use. And Article 51 allows the “right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member….until the Security Council has taken measures to maintain international peace and security.”

 

In other words, justifiable self-defense is permissible. However, Charter Articles 2(3), 2(4), and 33 absolutely prohibit any unilateral threat or use of force not:

  • specifically allowed under Article 51;

 

  • authorized by the Security Council; or

 

  • permitted by the US Constitution only amendments ratified by three-fourths of the states can change.

 

Although he knows better, he said Bush I “didn’t go all the way” in 1991 because “the UN did not give him permission to.” Going “through the back door” with UN-declared wars lets them “last longer and you do not have a completion, like we had in Korea and Vietnam.”

 

Weeks after Bush II invaded Iraq, he promoted his American Sovereignty Restoration Act to “end US membership of the United States in the United Nations.”

 

He also credited Bush for “ultimately upholding the principle that American national security is not a matter of international consensus, and that we don’t need UN authorization to act.”

 

In other words, he believes “the supreme law of the land” under the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) doesn’t matter even though all treaty obligations automatically become US law.

 

He warned that if America didn’t leave the UN, its “global planners” would establish “true world government” that would “interfere not only in our nation’s foreign policy matters, but in our domestic (ones) as well (and) America as we know it will cease to exist.”

 

He’s also against police state laws like the USA Patriot Act, though not for the right reasons. Key for him is loss of personal privacy.

 

While advocating free trade, he’s against NAFTA, DR-CAFTA, and other one-sided FTAs. They serve special interests, not everyone equitably.

 

Saying prohibition laws negate freedom, he calls the war on drugs “costly and ineffective, while creating terrible violent crime.” It’s also largely responsible for the world’s largest gulag. Filled mostly with nonviolent offenders, at most they deserve reprimands or fines, and those incarcerated for drug-related crimes deserve freedom.

 

As a libertarian, he believes government’s only role is to respect, protect, and defend personal liberties.

 

As the Libertarian Party’s Preamble states:

 

Everyone should retain “sovereign(ty) over their own lives,” not “sacrifice (it) for the benefit of others.”

 

In other words, government’s responsibility for universal healthcare, education, and other essential services is incompatible with personal freedom. Everyone should be on their own to provide them, even though millions, through no fault of their own, can’t.

 

In contrast, progressives have different view of freedom and responsibility. They believe government must assure equity, social justice, and safety net protections for society’s least advantaged. Throwing them overboard can’t be tolerated.

 

Paul’s Background

 

Paul served on and off in Congress since 1976. In 1988, his Libertarian Party presidential campaign failed. So did his 2008 Republican bid. Instead of running as a Libertarian or independent, he endorsed Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin.

 

He’s also a practicing obstetrician and gynecologist. Reportedly, he delivered thousands of babies.

 

In 1976, he founded the Foundation for Rational Economics and Education (FREE). It’s “dedicated to public education on the principles of free-market economics, sound money and limited government.”

 

His books include “Gold, Peace, and Prosperity;” “Challenge to Liberty;” “Freedom Under Siege;” “Ten Myths About Paper Money;” and “The Case for Gold.” In 1989, a FREE spinoff called the National Endowment for Liberty (NEFL) was established to disseminate more information about its ideology.

 

Paul’s Ten Principles of a Free Society

 

(1) Personal freedom.

 

(2) Support for all peaceful, voluntary economic and social associations.

 

(3) The inviolable right to justly acquired property.

 

(4) Opposition to government redistributing wealth or special privileges to any individual, group or business.

 

(5) The inviolability of individual sovereignty. Governments must never protect people from themselves.

 

(6) Governments must never claim monopoly power over a people’s money nor engage in official counterfeiting for any purpose.

 

(7) Opposition to aggressive wars, no matter their stated purpose.

 

(8) Jury nullification, pertaining to jurors judging the law as well as related facts.

 

(9) Opposition to all forms of involuntary servitude, including slavery, conscription, forced association, and mandated welfare distribution.

 

(10) Requiring governments, like people, to obey laws, abstain from force to coerce behavior, manipulate social outcomes, manage the economy, or tell other countries how to behave.

 

Paul’s Plan to Restore America

 

Its elements include:

 

(1) Balancing the budget.

 

(2) Cutting $1 trillion in his administration’s first year by eliminating five departments (Energy, HUD, Commerce, Interior and Education), abolishing the Transportation Security Administration, ending corporate subsidies, halting foreign aid, prohibiting foreign wars, and returning most spending to 2006 levels.

 

(3) Entitlements: Maintaining them for seniors and veterans, but letting younger workers opt out toward eventually ending them altogether. Block-granting Medicaid and other social programs to states. In other words, transition Washington entirely out of social spending.

 

(4) Cutting the federal workforce by 10%. Slash congressional pay and perks, and curb excess federal travel.

 

(5) Lowering corporate taxes to 15%. Let US companies repatriate capital tax-free. Extend all Bush tax cuts, and abolish income, capital gains, estate and personal savings taxes.

 

(6) Repealing Obamacare, Dodd-Frank financial reform, and Sarbanes-Oxley, pertaining to new or enhanced standards for corporations, top officials and public accounting firms. Also, mandating REINS requirements, pertaining to congressional up or down votes on all proposed measures with economic impact over $100 million. Moreover, abolish all onerous regulations by Executive Order.

 

(7) Conducting full Federal Reserve audits, and implement competing currency legislation to strengthen the dollar and stabilize inflation.

 

Paul on Other Issues

 

(1) Taxes: Abolish income, capital gains, and estate taxes, as well as the IRS. Provide more tax credits and deductions. Rely on excise taxes, non-protectionist tariffs, fees, and minimal corporate ones.

 

(2) Energy: Remove all restrictions on drilling, mining and nuclear power. Repeal federal taxes on gasoline. Abolish the EPA, and provide tax credits as incentives to develop and produce alternative energy technologies.

 

(3) Immigration: Enforce border security to keep undocumented immigrants out. Prohibit amnesty and social benefits for those here, and end automatic birthright citizenship for their children born on US soil.

 

(4) Abortion: Repeal Roe v. Wade granting abortion rights up to viability (fetal survival outside the uterus). Define life as beginning at conception, even for rape victims.

 

(5) Gun Ownership: Assure the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms even though it pertains to militia rights “to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions.”

 

Repeal the Brady Bill and Assault Weapons Ban restricting firearms purchases, and end US support for global gun control laws and other initiatives. Presidents, says Paul, should “be 100% committed to defending our God-given right to keep and bear arms,” even those most destructive apparently.

 

(6) Right to Work: Without saying so, he opposes hard-won labor rights, including failed Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) provisions to let workers “form, join, or assist labor organizations, to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts, and other purposes.”

 

Paul on Israel

 

Paul emphatically denies accusations of racism and anti-Semitism. He calls Israel one of America’s “most important friends.”

 

He supported Israel attacking Iraq’s Osirak reactor in June 1981. He also believes America should be less involved in its affairs. “They can take care of themselves,” he said. “Why do we have this automatic commitment that we’re going to send our kids and send our money endlessly to Israel?”

 

“I am personally against all foreign aid. We give $3 billion to Israel….It is ridiculous for us to be borrowing money from China and giving it to” other countries.

 

“The First Amendment grants all citizens the right to petition the US government, and this applies to AIPAC as much as anyone else. However, I oppose certain lobbying groups having more of an undue influence than others, and since one of the main purposes of AIPAC is to lobby for generous taxpayer subsidies to Israel, that portion of their influence would end under my administration.”

 

Racism Accusations

 

Truth and fiction define them. In 1992, commenting to on the Los Angeles riots, his newsletter said “(o)rder was only restored in LA when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began.”

 

It added that looting resulted from government providing Black communities with “civil rights, quotas, mandated hiring preferences, set-asides for government contracts, gerrymandered voting districts, black bureaucracies, black mayors, black curricula in schools, black TV shows, black TV anchors, hate crime laws, and public humiliation for anyone who dares question the black agenda.”

 

He also denounced America’s media support for establishing “an unlimited white checking account for underclass blacks.”

 

On January 8, 2008, New Republic contributor James Kirchick added more, quoting Paul’s newsletter saying:

 

“(I)f you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be.”

 

It called Black representative Barbara Jordan “the archetypical half-educated victimologist (whose) race and sex protect her from criticism.”

 

“Racial Violence Will Fill Our Cities (because) mostly black welfare recipients will feel justified in stealing from mostly white ‘haves.’ ”

 

“Jury verdicts, basketball games, and even music are enough to set of black rage, it seems.”

 

Whether or not Paul wrote or endorsed these and other comments isn’t clear. However, they appeared in newsletters bearing his name. He now disavows them. According to his 2008 campaign spokesman, Jesse Benton:

 

Paul granted “various levels of approval” to newsletter material, ranging from “no approval” to material he actually wrote. However, he never saw many issues so attributing comments in them to him appear suspect.

 

Responding to charges about hanging out with white supremacists, anti-Semitism, homophobia, and other extremist views, Texas NAACP president Nelson Linder said he’s known Paul for 20 years not to be racist. In fact, he called Martin Luther King a “hero.”

 

He also condemned police repression in Black communities and discriminatory mandatory sentencing rules directed mostly at them.

 

A Final Comment

 

Paul’s America endorses personal freedom, abolishing social spending, leaving everyone on their own sink or swim, reducing government’s size, minimally taxing corporations and super-rich elites, freeing them to operate as they wish, and returning the nation largely to 19th century harshness.

 

If elected, supporters may get more than they bargained for and not government serving everyone equitably, especially society’s least advantaged through no fault of their own.

 

The Constitution’s “general welfare” clause (Article I, Section 8) states:

 

“The Congress shall have power to….provide for (the) general welfare of the United States,” meaning all citizens. The Preamble’s opening words are “We the People.”

 

Increasingly, they’re just words. Under Paul, they’ll be abolished. Know what you’ll get by supporting him.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Saudi Arabian State Terror

No Comments

Saudi Arabian State Terror – Stephen Lendman

 

Annually, the State Department publishes human rights reports for over 190 countries. Its latest April 8, 2011 Saudi Arabia assessment discusses “significant human rights abuses and the inability of citizens to change its absolute monarchal rule. Abuses include:

  • “torture and physical abuse;

 

  • poor prison and detention center conditions;

 

  • arbitrary arrest and incommunicado detention;

 

  • denial of fair and public trials and lack of due process in the judicial system;

 

  • political prisoners;

 

  • restrictions on civil liberties such as freedom of speech (including the Internet);

 

  • assembly, association, movement, and severe restrictions on religious freedom; and

 

  • corruption and lack of transparency.”

 

Also mentioned were inequality and violence against women, human trafficking, no labor rights, discrimination on the basis of gender, religion, sect and ethnicity, and violations of children’s rights.

 

Saudi’s absolute monarchal rule is despotic, lawless and brutal. It’s a police state practicing state terrorism internally and regionally. It’s also Washington’s main Middle East ally after Israel.

 

In early December, Amnesty International (AI) published a report on the kingdom titled, “Saudi Arabia: Repression in the Name of Security.”

 

Largely unnoticed in the West like the State Department’s April assessment, major media scoundrels suppressed its ugly findings.

 

AI quoted Khaled al-Johani addressing reporters in Riyadh on the March 11, 2011 “Day of Rage,” saying:

 

“I am here to say we need democracy. We need freedom. We need to speak freely. We need no one to stop us from expressing our opinions.”

 

Shortly afterward he was arrested and charged with “communicating with the foreign media.” He’s now held incommunicado in Saudi’s notoriously repressive prison system.

 

On March 5, Press TV reported the arrest and detention of senior Saudi cleric Sheikh Tawfiq al-Amer. At issue was his call for constitutional monarchal rule.

 

On March 23, Press TV reported 100 Shia protesters arrested after participating in anti-government demonstrations for political reforms and immediate political prisoner releases.

 

More recently on December 5, Press TV reported large anti-government protests in Saudi Arabia’s oil-rich Eastern Province and another one on December 9 in Awamiyah, an Eastern Persian Gulf village.

 

Last April, Saudi’s Interior Ministry said 5,831 people were arrested for being associated with a “deviant group,” allegedly Al Qaeda. About 600 were sentenced. Another 600 awaited trials. Unsubstantiated terrorist related charges assures long, repressive prison terms.

 

A more recent high-profile case involved 16 men, including nine prominent reformists. They were sentenced to up to 30 years for allegedly trying to seize power by financing terrorism with laundered money. Their charges and trial had no legitimacy whatever. They were victimized for advocating political change and human rights.

 

AI said Saudi authorities “launched a new wave of repression in the name of security.” Human rights protesters have been brutally oppressed. At the same time, a new anti-terror law exacerbates the absence of civil and human rights.

 

Last June, AI got a leaked copy. Provisions in it include:

  • prosecuting peaceful dissent as terrorism and “harming the reputation of the state or its position;”

 

  • a minimum of 10 years imprisonment for anyone questioning the integrity of the king or crown prince;

 

  • authorities will have carte blanche power to detain alleged security suspects indefinitely without charge or trial; and

 

  • terrorism’s definition is expanded to include endangering “national unity” and/or questioning the integrity of the king or regime.

 

Overall, abusive practices will be legalized, including an anything goes policy of crushing dissent.

 

Saudi Arabia’s Repressive Government

 

Saudi state power rests solely with the king and ruling Al Saud family. He especially wields absolute power to rule despotically. The nation’s Constitution affords ordinary citizens and other residents no rights. Women are especially marginalized and denied.

 

The Constitution gives sole power to the ruling monarchy. Saudi Basic Law, adopted in 1992, declared the kingdom a monarchy ruled by the sons and grandsons of King Abd Al Aziz Al Saud. It also proclaimed Sharia (Islamic) law supreme.

 

Political parties and national elections are prohibited. Saudi kings appoint a Council of Ministers, including a prime minister, first and second deputies, 20 ministers, various advisors, and heads of major autonomous organizations.

 

Thirteen provinces comprise the kingdom. The ruling monarch appoints their governors. They’re either princes or close royal family relatives. In 1993, ministers became subject to four-year term limitations. In 1997, a Consultative Council was expanded from 60 to 90 members.

 

Legislation is by Council of Ministers resolution, subject to royal approval. Democracy is a dirty word. Saudi’s 27 million residents have no rights whatever. The media are severely constrained. Anyone dissenting is subject to arbitrary arrest and detention, including political critics, bloggers, academics, foreign nationals, and others.

 

On September 25, King Abdullah said women, beginning in 2015, will be allowed to run in municipal elections, and be appointed to the Shura Council monarchal advisory body.

 

Nonetheless, they’re severely restricted. They can’t travel, drive, engage in paid work or higher education. They also can’t marry without male custodian permission.

 

Rage Bubbling Up Against the Regime

 

Perhaps mindful of other regional protests, Saudis have begun rallying publicly for change. They demand human rights be respected. They want social and political reforms, including free, open and fair elections. They also want political prisoners released.

 

In response, severe crackdowns followed. Hundreds of peaceful protesters were arrested and detained without trial. Others were charged with “vague security-related and other offenses. (AI) considers many of (them) prisoners of conscience, held solely for peacefully expressing their rights to freedom of expression and assembly.”

 

In recent years, thousands have been detained on security grounds and remain imprisoned under horrific conditions. Victims include clerics, alleged Al Qaeda members, anyone with alleged connections or sympathies, and others suspected of anti-regime sentiment or its ties to Washington and other Western states.

 

Everyone arrested for security reasons faces torture and other forms of abuse. It’s commonplace “because interrogators know that they can commit their crimes without fear of punishment.”

 

Abuse is also encouraged by the “ready acceptance by courts of ‘confessions’ forced (from) detainees (by) beatings, electric shocks, and other forms of torture and ill-treatment.”

 

Many detainees are untried. Others brought to court face grossly unfair proceedings, including secret ones with no right of appeal. Since established in October 2008, Saudi’s Specialized Criminal Court hears them.

 

Victims are mostly human rights defenders, political reform activists, members of religious minorities, and many others guilty of no internationally recognized offense.

 

In the past, sporadic political violence occurred against state institutions, oil installations and Western nationals. Severe crackdowns followed. AI’s report focused mainly on 2011 developments. Philip Luther, AI’s Middle East/North Africa director said:

 

“Peaceful protesters and supporters of political reform in the country have been targeted for arrest in an attempt to stamp out the kinds of call for reform that have echoed across the region.”

 

Many arrested are charged with “disrupting order.” Some are forced to sign pledges to never again protest. In addition, they’re forbidden to travel. Others face secret kangaroo proceedings. Those affected are guilty by accusation.

 

A Final Comment

 

Washington has close ties to despotic regional regimes, including Saudi Arabia. It uses them advantageously to advance its Greater Middle East project for unchallenged dominance.

 

Wars are waged to replace independent regimes with client ones. Saudi and other regional governments rule despotically. They’re also US proxies when called on, including against Gaddafi’s Libya, Bahrain, Yemen, Syria.

 

As a result, they’re rewarded for partnering with Washington’s worst crimes. Who said it didn’t pay!

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Israel v. Palestine in 2012

No Comments

Israel v. Palestine in 2012 – by Stephen Lendman

 

Palestinians have endured decades of ruthless occupation. World leaders decline support. They’re left largely on their own despite growing millions globally supporting them.

 

Life in occupied Palestine is harsh and repressive. On December 26, Jerusalem’s mayor, Nir Barakat, delivered another blow. The Municipality will classify 70,000 Israeli Arab citizens non-residents and involuntarily transfer them to West Bank locations.

 

At issue is entirely Judaizing Jerusalem through forced ethnic cleansing to facilitate escalated settlement construction. It’s also part of creating a greater Jerusalem and preventing a two-state solution.

 

Two new Haaretz reports are also significant heading into 2012, one by writer Barak Ravid.

 

After refusing peace negotiations with Israel unless illegal settlement construction stops, he said:

 

“The Palestinian leadership submitted a proposal to renew peace talks with Israel that drops their longstanding demand that Israel ceases all West Bank settlement construction, a top Israeli official said on Wednesday.”

 

In mid-December, PA officials told Quartet members peace talks could resume if Israel releases 100 long held Palestinian prisoners in good faith.

 

Abbas faced heavy pressure for months, no matter decades of past peace process futility because Israel won’t tolerate it. It needs enemies to justify confrontation and violence.

 

Nonetheless, EU and other Quartet members told Abbas he’ll share responsibility if talks don’t resume by late January.

 

“There’s real concern in the Quartet that after that date, Abbas will return to UN initiatives,” an unnamed Israeli official said. At the same time, Netanyahu vowed no talks if Fatah/Hamas unity government plans proceed, saying:

 

Fatah will have to “choose between peace with Israel or peace with Hamas.” Reconciliation shows “weakness. There cannot be peace” if both sides unite. “What happened….in Cairo is a tremendous blow to peace and a great victory for terrorism.”

 

Israel wants Hamas marginalized, isolated, and bogusly accused of terrorism. In fact, it’s Palestine’s legitimately elected government.

 

Baseless accusations are Israel’s stock in trade. Hamas wants peace, equity and justice for all Palestinians. Numerous times its present and past leaders expressed willingness to recognize Israel in return for self-determination in peace inside pre-1967 borders – 22% of historic Palestine. Moreover, they agreed to unilateral ceasefires in spite of repeated Israeli violations.

 

Nonetheless, defensive responses follow continued Israeli provocations. Washington and Israel call it “terrorism.” Under international law, it’s legitimate self-defense.

 

Despite Abbas’ offer, Israel rejected it out of hand, claiming one precondition replaces another and his proposal is too vague. Will full or preparatory talks follow? Will new conditions be demanded?

 

In fact, Israel negotiates one way. Its long suit never included equity, justice and fairness. Negotiations at any level will prove futile like earlier. Both sides know it, but the charade continues whether or not talks resume.

 

According to Palestine’s chief negotiator Saeb Erekat, no preconditions were set, saying:

 

“A freeze of settlement construction, holding negotiation on the 1967 lines, and the release of prisoners are not preconditions but Israeli obligations, without which we can see no renewal of negotiations with Israel.”

 

Netanyahu countered, saying Israel rejects talks if Palestinian unity proceeds, and “(t)he peace process can only advance while maintaining security arrangements, which is becoming more difficult in light of the current situation in the region.”

 

At the same time, Haaretz writers Yanir Yagna and Gili Cohen headlined, “IDF confirms preparations for extensive future Gaza military action,” saying:

 

Following on and off air strikes and ground assaults since summer, the IDF’s “Gaza Division is preparing for a possible large-scale incursion into the Gaza Strip….”

 

According to Gaza Division’s Southern Brigade General Tal Hermoni:

 

“We are preparing and, in fact, are ready for another campaign, which will be varied and different, to renew our deterrence.”

 

Stopping short of saying war, he left little doubt what he means. So does IDF chief General Benny Gantz. Commenting on Cast Lead’s third anniversary, he called it “an excellent operation that achieved deterrence for Israel vis-a-vis Hamas.”

 

However, warning about new emerging cracks, he said expect more conflict. Israel will initiate “swift and painful” punishment. “I do not advise Hamas to test our mettle.” The next Gaza campaign will be shorter than Cast Lead with much greater firepower, he stressed.

 

Gantz and Hermoni left no doubt. Israel plans war. Perhaps its timing will coincide with expected Washington belligerence against Syria and Iran. At risk is inflaming the entire region.

 

General war may follow. Nuclear weapons may be used. Humanity will be threatened.

 

Washington, key NATO partners, and Israel plan world dominance, even if destroying it happens in the process.

 

A Final Comment

 

Hamas is Palestine’s legitimate government. At Israel’s behest, Washington spuriously calls it a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

 

Al-Zatouna Center contributer Dr. Mohen Moh’d Saleh discussed its eight distinct features. His narrative diverges greatly from hostile Western discourse. Notably, Hamas is characterized by:

 

(1) “moderate Islamic discourse.”

 

(2) “high dynamism” that lets it function “under difficult circumstances and regain its strength and vitality after harsh strikes.”

 

(3) “Shura-based” consultation that keeps it cohesive and strong regardless of Israel’s response.

 

(4) emphasis on polity, social needs, charity, jihad for liberation, and education.

 

(5) effective resistance.

 

(6) popularity at home and abroad.

 

(7) remaining corruption free.

 

(8) legitimacy to gain moral and financial support.

 

It also wants Palestinian unity through elections. However, participation entails perils under occupation. Washington and Israel won’t permit a legitimate process unless assured Fatah, not Hamas, will win and maintain Israeli imposed harshness.

 

Moreover, authority and resistance conflict. In part, getting along entails going along to assure needed financial and other aid continues.

 

Yet liberation depends on resistance. It also requires Palestinian consensus and replacing farcical peace talks with real ones.

 

Palestinians deserve leaders able to deliver what they’ve long been denied – to live free on their own land, in their own country securely in peace.

 

If equitable unity government is possible, perhaps it’s how to get it, but not without considerable more struggle ahead.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

TOWARDS A STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE AFRICAN/DIASPORAN DEVELOPMENT: AN AFRICAN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE

No Comments

TOWARDS A STRATEGY FOR SUSTAINABLE AFRICAN/DIASPORAN  DEVELOPMENT: AN AFRICAN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE

by Mwalimu W. Kabaila on Monday, October 12, 2009

 

As a graduate student at UCLA in 1976, majoring in Political Science, with a specialization in Southern African politics, the burning question , at that time, was “What Path to Development for Africa”. Today, the answer to the question remains as elusive now, as then, perhaps, even more so. As I’ve wrestled with this question, since my graduate years, I feel much closer to a workable solution and strategy, given the current realities on the ground in the sub-continent. Today, unlike 1976, many African countries have attained a degree of “independence”, in as much as the faces of governance have changed and now, have African origin. However, colonial rule, in many and most instances, has only been replaced by a system of neo-colonialism and a philosophy of neo-liberalism which keeps the African governments subservient, and holds their economies hostage to non-effective aid policies, IMF loans, global corporate greed and exploitation, European and American intervention in internal affairs (political, economic and social), political assassination, sabotage, and divide and rule tactics. Such antics on the part of Western entities, breed internal corruption, unstable governments, social displacement, disempowerment, and outright poverty. We still await the studies investigating whether there has been overt or covert involvement by the West in a conspiracy to spread HIV/AIDS in Africa as a means of population control.

While this kind of behavior is expected and anticipated by Western governments, what is not to be tolerated is the complicity by certain African governments, which allow it, or foster internal strife, thus furthering impoverishment and disempowerment of their own populace. The West’s involvement in the assassinations of Patrice Lumumba, Thomas Sankara and Amilcar Cabral are well documented. The loss of such leaders and visionaries such as Sekou Toure, Steven Biko and countless others, have left a leadership vacuum in the sub-continent, which at times, seems insurmountable. Thus, thinking outside the proverbial box is needed if we are to address the question of Sustainable Development in Africa, and by extension, the African Diaspora. This implies an answer that one is not likely to find in academia or institutions of higher learning. This requires a potential solution which is born out of the struggle of African people, everywhere we have found oppression, exploitation and toil. Those of us who have shed blood, tears and sweat in our quest for liberation and a higher level of life, come with different perspectives than those whose experience has been limited to the confines of academia or offices with air conditioners or what the topic of the next lecture should be. The view from the trenches is somewhat different that the one from the hill, and therefore our solutions and approaches should attempt to form a synthesis of both perspectives. This will be the direction and shape of the content of this paper.

In the past, many academic circles have viewed the difference in approaches by W.E.B. DuBois and Booker T. Washington, as being mutually exclusive. DuBois’ Talented Tenth would pull the rest of the race up as it made social progress and achievements in various areas of critical social space, i.e. Medicine, Law, Business, religion, Entertainment, Education, Communications, Sports, etc. On the other hand, Booker T. emphasized the learning of basic skills, such as welding, Agriculture, and industrial work. This emphasis even shaped the curriculum of some of the historically Black colleges and universities. Tennessee State, in Nashville, used to be named Tenn. A &I, which stood for Agricultural and Industrial. The Black boarding school I graduated from, Laurinburg N&I, in Laurinburg, N.C., was known back then, as a Normal and Industrial school. The idea was, that in these schools a basic education was all that was necessary to function in society and to get a good paying job. One did not have to learn Shakespeare’s Sonnets, or the Philosophy of Hume, Locke and Descartes by verse. Some scholarly works also make mention of the differences which existed between Marcus Garvey and Washington, with reference to Garvey’s emphasis on developing Africa, using it as a power base for blacks in the Diaspora.

2)

 

Malcolm X taught us, “that of all our research, history is our best reward”. As we look back now, at these iconic figures in Black History, each of them may have held a key to the intellectual and practical puzzle called, “What Path Development for Africa, and by extension, the Diaspora”? What emerges as we purview each of these tendencies in the Black Liberation Movement is that they may not appear to be as conflicting as they seemed, just a few years ago. In fact, it is looking more like they may even be complimentary to each other, or put another way, each forms a necessary thesis for a synthesis. Our strategy will seek to explore this possibility.

DuBois is not incorrect by stating we need a sector of our community which are knowledgeable, capable and committed to elevating the entire national community up to a level where we all can live freely and provide the kind of prosperity for our future generations, which all people strive for. This sector of our people, what Harold Cruse refers to as the “Negro Intellectual”, but what I will call the Revolutionary and Progressive Intelligentsia, must be prepared to not only function and learn from acting on a “macro level” in the dominant society, but must be willing and capable to also, utilize those skills in carving out “critical social space” (in Medicine, Law, Communications, Transportation, Health, Science and Technology) in the image and interests of our National Community. What we mean by “in the image of”, is that, how we engage these “critical areas” must be guided by African Centered values, laws of governance, and ethics and not the Euro-centric ones we have docilely followed heretofore. Our revolutionary intelligentsia must not cower to Euro-centric paradigms, but must elevate to be/becoming social engineers, who construct theories and ideologies which reflect our (African peoples) vision and view of the world and how we, collectively, wish to shape it, and then build the institutional frameworks and societal structures which house these aspirations, goals, and objectives. However, it is not enough for our intellectuals to just delve into the realm of ideas, but too, must formulate the best means and ways of implementing those ideas in such a way that they lead to human flourishing and the ability of any system, government or institution we devise, to service and satisfy human need. Practice proves the validity of every good idea or theory. The proverb which states, “while it’s true we don’t live by bread alone, we can only come to that conclusion once we’ve eaten”, rings true. The first premise.

The second premise of this syllogism is put forward by, nonetheless, than Booker T. Washington, the ex-slave who rose up to become the Founder of Tuskegee Institute (now University). While much of the critique of Washington is directed at his many questionable political views, his economic programs, when looked at in historical perspective, have much merit, requiring further investigation. It appears, that in the current social millieu, that his emphasis on practical and trade skills, was not misplaced at all. In 1881, the year that Tuskegee was founded, Washington stressed such industrial skills as farming, welding, carpentry, brick making, shoemaking, printing and cabinet making. These skills also helped to involve students in the building and expansion of the school. Just as trade skills were used in the building and expansion of Tuskegee University, those same skill sets, and more, can be used in Community and Nation Building also. What may have been lacking in Washington’s strategy was a theoretical and visionary framework of where these skills sets could take us, as a people united around a set of principles, goals and common objectives. Yet, in the context of building a National Community and an infra-structure for Pan African Unity, trade and other practical skills sets take on new meaning and relevance, especially in the area of Sustainable Development. Not only do we need brick makers, but we now need solar installers and maintenance persons. We need windmill panel makers, installers, water usage and purification systems and mechanisms, and contractors who have the knowledge and skilled worker base, to refurbish and retrofit new and existing housing in order to maximize their sustainability and energy efficiency. These are jobs that would not just be limited to the US, but as the world moves closer to a “Peak Oil” critical moment, these skills will be in demand all over the world and will need a trained workforce to supply and fill that demand. The beauty of Washington’s position is that it occurred at the same time as the Industrial Revolution in the Western world. As a community of people Blacks were not poised, nor was American

3)

society receptive to, blacks taking full advantage of the economic transformation about to sweep the globe. Booker T. Washington made his transition in 1915. The first Model T Ford was made in 1908. It remains disputed when the first airplane flew. But these two industries alone, revolutionized trade, commerce, and the tourist industries for time immemorial. Yet, the thought lingers, what if Washington had prepared and trained a Black work force to service and permeate these key industries? However, we should not wallow in despair as the Sustainable and Green Revolution afford the same possibilities and potential as the Industrial Revolution. Van Jones, author of the best selling book, “Green Collar Economy”, and former Green Jobs Czar of the Obama administration, points out that Blacks are well suited to take advantage of the jobs and industries which will grow out of the Green Revolution currently gaining momentum in American and other industrialized societies. These could also be the type of good jobs, which ex-felons and at-risk youth could do easily, when trained, giving them a degree of parity in the work force, allowing them to enter back into the social fabric, cutting recidivism, thus, making them productive citizens.

The synthesis we hope to form, is really a combination of the ideology and practice of two historical figures, Marcus Garvey and Kwame Nkrumah. Garvey’s economic policies were fairly advanced for his time, but their value and vision are very relevant in the context of 2009-2010. Garvey , in his wisdom, sought to engage blacks in infra-structure building for what he envisioned as a Black Nation, which could independently trade with other Black Nations in the Caribbean, Africa and throughout Diaspora. This idea took shape and form in the establishment of the Negro Factories Corporation, which, in Garvey’s words, was to “build and operate factories in the big industrial centers of the United States, Central America, the West Indies (sic) and Africa, to manufacture every marketable commodity”. Through his vision and leadership, Garvey’s organization, the Universal Negro Improvement Association (UNIA), started chains of grocery stores, restaurants, steam laundries, tailoring and dressmaking shops, a millinery store and publishing house. In no small measure, this accounts for one of the reasons the membership of the UNIA grew into the millions, worldwide, and was able to employ many of its own people, while providing the means to deliver basic goods and services. The West African country of Liberia, founded by ex-slaves, was to serve as a base of operations to build infra-structure for delivery of similar goods and services on the African continent. The Liberia project was launched in 1920, and it sought to build trade schools, colleges, universities, industrial plants and railroads to facilitate trade and commerce. While Garvey is credited with the phrase, “Africa for the Africans”, he did not advocate that all African Americans emigrate back to Africa, just those who chose not to accept to live within the confines of a racist, oppressive and exploitative system which sought to deny people of African descent, basic human and civil rights as expressed in the Constitution. Thus, Africa, in Garvey’s scheme and model, was to serve as a political base for its Diasporan children wishing to “return home”. The final link in this master strategy was the Black Star Line, which was to purchase ships which would be used to transport people and goods across the Atlantic and throughout the Caribbean. Garvey may have made what, in hindsight, was a fatal mistake, and could have learned a valuable lesson from DuBois. Garvey could have had more trained and professional people manage, purchase, register and raise money for the ships in the Black Star Line. Nevertheless, Garvey’s vision was masterful, and serves as a model and paradigm for what is possible, even today.

As a young West African, Ghanaian student, Kwame Nkrumah graduated from Lincoln University, in Pennsylvania, in 1942. As he continued his education, he grew increasingly, under the influence of Marcus Garvey, W.E.B. Du Bois and George Padmore, an organizer of the Manchester Conference of 1945, which is credited for laying the establishing the agenda for African decolonization. As Garvey was laying groundwork for building economic infra-structure on the African continent, Kwame Nkrumah was becoming the inspiration and personification of the unity of African people the world over, with his philosophy of Pan Africanism. Nkrumah’s plan was to build Ghana as a model African country, and learn to export the model to other African countries as they gained independence. Working with C.L.R. James and George Padmore to organize the 5th Pan African Congress, Nkrumah was quickly emerging as an

4)

ideologue for Pan Africanism. Many and most of the African independence leaders attending this conference, began to lay out broad strategies on how they would collectively and particularly, pursue independence in their respective countries. Later, Nkrumah was to become the inspiration and agitator for the Organization of African Unity (OAU). Many organizations in Africa and the Diaspora, still aspire to build the ever elusive Pan African Unity, which DuBois, Garvey and Nkrumah espoused. However, it may be the philosophy and teachings of Booker T. and Garvey which provide us with the paths to achieve this noble goal.

Garvey’s notion of “building an industrial infra-structure which provides every commodity”, may seem a bit ideal in today’s world, but when connected with Booker T’s idea of building a workforce of skilled laborers, it has intrinsic value in the following areas which we will call:

SEVEN FACTORS OF SUSTAINABLE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA AND DIASPORA

I. Establishing Trade and Commerce Missions (Africa, New Africa, Caribbean)

II. Revenue and Funding Sources – Dues, Foundations, Investment Clubs/corporations, IMF, UN, taxes

III. Infra-structure Building – Garvey’s notion of building in every industry combined with Booker T’s trade skills training.

IV. Expansion of Cultural and Economic Trade and Exchange

V. Modernization of Agricultural Production/Distribution among African peoples

VI. Systematic and Strategic, Transfer and Exchange of Knowledge, Technology and Science between/among Continental and Diasporan Africans

VII. Dynamic Development Strategies and Methods – Triangular (Africa, New Africa, Caribbean); Square (inclusive of African ex-patriates)

 

SEVEN FACTORS OF SUSTAINABLE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA AND DIASPORA

1. Establishing Trade and Commerce Missions (Africa, New Africa, Caribbean)

A. Determining which industries are most attractive to and marketable for African/Diasporan people; e.g. Fashion

Industry(African centered designs, textiles, clothing outlets) tourism, agriculture, herbology, sustainable housing

Construction (Esp. African centered architecture designs).

B. Decide where to place each industrial center/plant in order to maximize production and distribution of the

5)

 

designated commodities.

C. Determining the most efficient trade/commerce/transportation routes to get products to market, and which

are for export and which need to be imported.

D. Given the above factors, price schedules must be established which allow for affordability, but also enough profit to make the industry sustainable over time/circumstances (market conditions, weather/climate changes competition.

E. Economic Intelligence – defense and development.

F. Determining the best places to begin building African Marketplaces, which would also house museums, learning centers, theaters, Community Administrative centers (Council of Elders, youth/Simba Corps, Cultural/Convention Center, Communication and Response Teams.

G. Training centers for the various trades or a trade college/university.

2. Revenue and Funding Sources

A. dues, taxes, IMF, Foundations, grants, donations, charities

B. The key difference is that these funds will not go to corrupt politicians or civil servants, but will be allocated and administrated by a Foundation, with a Pan African Board of Directors which will determine which projects get funded based on need; how, when, where, and by what means.

C. We propose that any Reparations which comes in monetary form also be allocated through such Foundation, or Foundation approved sources.

D. Immedidate debt relief for African and Caribbean Countries and people of African descent, as part of a reparations package

3. Infra Structure Building

A. Transportation – Cross continental Rail System, Modernized air transport system, commercial shipping fleet, trucking system. Roads which facilitate commerce and tourism trade.

B. Sustainable Energy – water (waterfalls, reservoirs, ocean, stream), wind, methanol-ethanol, Solar, Bio-Thermal, which all link up with a continental energy grid.

C. Indigenous Sustainable Sanitation Systems and Water purification

D. Indigenous Communications Systems with the ability to link up with Global systems

E. Reduction of and Penalties for Toxic Waste caused by foreign and/or domestic corporations.

4. Expansion of Cultural and Economic Trade an Exchange

A. Exhibition and Preservation of African People artistic heritage and the progressive character of its culture – Museums, Festivals Seminars, Performing Arts Shows

1) As African people enter into this Renaissance era and new stage of development , new rules of engagement must be designed to enter into the global economy. It is mandatory that institutions are built which preserve the

6)

integrity of African and Diasporan art forms, languages, systems of thought (Dogon, Maat, Ifa, Akhan, Zulu, Masai, etc.) and cultural traditions, such as Council of Elders, Rites of Passage, Cooperative Economics, Extended Family, Reverence for Nature and the Spiritual Quest for Oneness with a God Force. These defining elements of African life and culture must not be lost or compromised at the expense of modernization and/or development.

2) Recognition that Africa Culture is one of Africa’s most important , if not the most important exports. It has played a dominant role in the American, South American, Caribbean, and Australian cultures, and now even in faraway places such as Japan. African culture has economic and human value. Thus, it must be packaged to represent the best of what Africa was, is and has the possibility to become, though, it should not just be viewed as a commodity, rather, an expression of who we are as a People in the forward flow of human progress.

B. Employment of Culture in our Collective Struggle for Human Liberation and Transformation

1) Culture must provide the foundation for our:

(a) Identity – who we are, based on our historical Personality as a people

(b)Purpose – based on who we are, what our role and responsibility is in relationship to elevating the quality of life of our people, creating human progress, and transforming society to reflect the best of who we are as Africans and humans.

(c) Direction – the means we choose to achieve the above. To engage in the struggle to define, defend and develop ourselves as African, Pan Africanists and humans. The process(es) of Social Transformation which allows the human personality to realize its fullest potential, and creates a social context which allows for human flourishing.

2) Definition of a Black Aesthetic which gives Black/African art its distinction and unique qualities as an art form.

3) African and African centered Culture is our most valuable product and therefore, must not only be preserved, but promoted among our own people in our quest to regain our historical personality, and overcome the Post Traumatic Shock of Enslavement.

C. Culture as Economic Stimulus for Africa and Diaspora

1) Gain economic dominance in those areas of Culture where we can gain a measure of control, i.e.

(a) African centered Fashion Design, tailoring, textiles, haberdashery, millinery

(b) Control of Music Production, distribution and promotion

( c) African Centered Architectural Design

(d) Sports and Entertainment personalities donating to Foundations engaged in Sustainable Development policy, programs and projects.

(e) More exchange between and among African (Nigerian, Ghanaian, Senegalese) and New African filmmakers; building community theaters.

(f) Encouraging youth to become more inventive and innovative in technology and teaching modalities, particularly in Black schools.

7)

 

5. Modernization of Agricultural Production among African people is mandatory, while Preserving the quality of Rural, Social and Cultural Life.

A. Low Carbon foods are healthier/while balance must be struck with export/import crops.

B. Irrigation systems must be installed and maintained, esp. in arid and dry areas.

C. Basis for industry-wide growth as Garvey called for; feeding into grocery markets and restaurant chains; developing food and herb coops; Holistic Health Coops and delivery systems which service underserved communities.

D. Methodologies which ensure that African Mineral Wealth benefits indigenous people. Corruption must be challenged and rooted out, and replaced by a system which allows re-distribution of wealth on a level of parity. Quatar and Kuwait might serve as models.

 

6. Transfer and Exchange of Knowledge, Technology and Science between and among Continental Africans and Diasporans –

A. Each sector of the African World (Continental Africans, African Americans, African ex-patriates, Caribbeans, Brazilians, Africans in Europe, New Zealand, Australia, Fiji, and the rest of Diaspora) must seek methodologies and modalities whereby Science, Knowledge and Technology will be used for human good and progress from an African Worldview, which puts humanity, and Human Good at the center. Emphasis on establishing consortiums, economic clubs, Coops, Conferences and strive to build Pan African Universities which can encourage inventions, study of African languages, architecture, science, Math, Governance, and requirements for re-structuring civil society.

 

7. Dynamic Development Strategies and Methods –

A. Revolution, as a social phenomena, should never be limited to just struggle from physical bondage, but is inclusive of economic, political and psychological liberation also. Sustainable development strategies and methodologies must be cognizant of this fact, while seeking ways and means of empowering the disenfranchised (peasants, workers and people of color). In this millineum, in todays’ world, Sustainable Development is the sine qua non of today’s revolutionary process. Sloganizing, theorizing nor repeating ideological formulations will no longer suffice as substitutes for designing ways in which we satisfy human need. The degree to which ideologies, theories and slogans contribute to human growth and flourishing, i.e. Sustainable Development, is the new criteria for their validity. Now is the time to make the world we only imagined 60 years ago.

 

The key dynamic to the above proposal is its Comprehensiveness. Obviously, all of these elements cannot be addressed at the same time or to the same degree. Yet, it remains a Strategic Plan for Sustainable Development which can be debated how it is tactically implemented in phases, based on priority, budgetary constraints, and economic/social conditions. It is important here, to define what is meant by Sustainable Development. There are at least 3 Key Elements: Environmental, Economic and Socio-Cultural. Environmental concerns address how we design and balance environmental policy and programmatic initiatives in a manner which is respectful and cognizant of our responsibility to

8)

be/become good stewards of the earth and nature. The issue of “Peak Oil” points to the need to manage the earth’s resources with maximum efficiency and conservation. The second element of Sustainability, economics, addresses equitable distribution of goods and services, while respecting each person’ human worth and right to benefit from the bounty of the earth’s resources. The socio-cultural element of sustainability identifies key areas of development such as health, housing, jobs, education, agriculture, transportation, technology, spiritual, ethical, artistic and value dimensions of Sustainable Development. While the African Union (AU, formerly Organization of African Unity) seeks to address issues in these critical areas, it remains the responsibility of “Sustainable Minded Developers” to begin strategic building of these infra-structure modalities. These modalities must seek ways to circumvent current political realities which hinder and impede real sustainable development in African and Diasporan communities. We have attempted to draw key elements from the philosophical thrust of each, Washington, DuBois, Garvey and Nkrumah. By reaching across and outside of the continental divide, we hope to have formulated a policy outline for strategic economic development which is truly a joint venture and Pan African in scope and content.

The last sixty years have been marked by worldwide revolution, in which many of the emerging nations and peoples fought against oppression, exploitation and toil imposed by racist and profit motivated regimes which had very low regard for the well-being of their subjects. Malcolm X pointed out to us, that the Bandung Conference illuminated the fact, that it was essentially people of color and poor people who were victimized by colonialism and the imperialistic designs of Europe and its collaborators. Many of the independence movements which followed did little to improve the economic well-being of the constituent masses, as neo-colonial and neo-liberal policies were instituted, which continued to serve the interests of the former colonizers. This paper seeks to detail, with strategic design, how African peoples the world over, can begin to take back into their own hands, their own “destiny and daily lives, and step back on the stage of human history as a free, proud and productive peoples.”

In December, 2010, the largest assembly of people of African descent in history, will meet at the FESMAN FESTIVAL, in Dakar, Senegal. This assembly is being called the beginning of the African Renaissance. A renaissance is not just defined by the quality of life of its people. If Africa and its Diaspora aspire to reach a real renaissance and achieve full and final liberation, it must seek a quality of unity, which Kwame Nkrumah envisioned in his concept of Pan Africanism. In his book, Consciencism, Nkrumah, correctly points out, that “while each social system has a supporting ideology, a revolutionary ideology seeks to introduce a new social system”. Therefore, it remains incumbent of every African of good will and conscience, to aid in the definition of the impending African Renaissance. The Industrial Revolution and the rise in Technological Superiority defined the era of European and American dominance in Global geo-politics, during the past century. As a student of history, there are clear signs that this era is in decline, while marking the ascent of a New World Order in which the world’s people of color and its disenfranchised will play a key role. It is within this historical context that we wish to place the African Renaissance. To summarize, the following qualities are proposed in building strategies for a Pan African Sustainable Development:

 

 

1. Comprehensive and Multi-dimensional aproaches to development.

 

2. Integrative – Integration of banking, film, communications and media, Fashion and Hair Industries, tourism, etc.

 

3. Synergism – A synergistic basket of program and projects requiring short and long planning for thier implementation.

 

4. Triangular Development – fundamental to building Pan African Community is the building of linkages betwwen and among continental Africans, African Americans and Caribbeans.

 

Towards this end we offer these policy proposals, programs and projects with the hope they lend themselves to African peoples (globally), making a meaningful contribution to the forward flow of creating a world in which, “we, our children and our people, can live, love and create freely, and walk in a warmer Sun”. Though practice is never quite up to principles, our ancestors and our children demand that we represent the best of what it means to be African and human in the World.

Humbly Submitted, Mwalimu W. Kabaila

 

Copyright @ Simbamaat Consultants 2011

Grim 2012 Economic Outlook

No Comments

Grim 2012 Economic Outlook – by Stephen Lendman

 

Yearend isn’t just about holiday season binge shopping, parties, and over-indulgence. It’s also when economic predictions surface.

 

The Wall Street Journal publishes consensus views. On December 23, it headlined, “Risks Cloud Outlook for Economy in 2012,” saying:

 

“The economy is poised for another year of muddling through. Most private economists forecast a modest 2% growth rate for the US….with a pace subdued by housing woes, a lackluster job market, and cuts by government.”

 

“They also warn of potential spillover from weakness abroad, including a mild recession apparently under way in Europe.”

 

Concerns and uncertainties highlighted included:

  • global weakness, threatening US exports;

 

  • weak housing demand with foreclosures affecting prices;

 

  • protracted unemployment and weak job creation; and

 

  • government belt tightening.

 

Overall, mainstream economists predict continued recovery from crisis conditions beginning in late 2007. In fact, heading into it, they forecast continued good times.

 

According former market analyst Bob Farrell:

 

“When all the experts and forecasts agree – something else is going to happen.”

 

In other words, when mainstream consensus forecasts one way, expect another.

 

On December 22, on the Finance News Network, investor/author/analyst Jim Rogers sees current problems worsening because of too much spending and debt.

 

Asked to elaborate on what matters most, he said “too much debt” is problem one because the Fed “keeps printing money.” It spells trouble because it won’t stop until “systemic collapse.”

 

“It’s going to be very, very serious pain. You’re going to see riots in the street. You’re going to see serious, serious problems, maybe perhaps (more) war….”

 

No matter who leads America, he added, he has “absolutely no confidence at all that anything’s going to be done….”

 

In 2012, Gerald Celente predicts:

 

Festering socio-economic/financial/geopolitical trends will climax next year. “Some will arrive with a big bang and others less dramatically….but no less consequentially.”

 

On December 28, Financial Times contributor Mark Mallock-Brown headlined, “The downward slide continues – the great revolt will come later,” saying:

 

“Next year is not going to be better….Whatever temporary economic fixes are applied to the eurozone, American deficits and unemployment, the overheated Chinese real estate market, petering Indian reforms or stalling Brazilian growth,” expect more slide.

 

Global economic dislocations are “increasingly disorderly.” Deceptive political rhetoric may prove the “calm before the storm.”

 

As Progressive Radio New Hour regular Jack Rasmus explains, they consistently miss major turning points, “including their failure to predict the epic recession of 2008, their erroneous prediction of a rapid ‘V’-shape recovery in 2009-10, and now their failure to foresee what’s coming in the Eurozone, China and Emerging markets.”

 

Rasmus called mainstream economists “bird(s) without wings.” Practically all of them missed the impending 2008 crisis. Moreover, they’re blind to the “coming deeper economic crisis that will almost certainly emerge no later than early 2013 and potentially” much earlier as Eurozone, China and other economies crater.

 

Obama’s economic programs failed badly. Instead of creating jobs, helping homeowners, resurrecting housing, and aiding troubled state and local governments, he focused on Wall Street bailouts, transferring wealth to America’s super-rich, and relying on business to hire when they’re hoarding cash and treading water, not expanding.

 

Mainstream economists missed the significance. They also ignored the importance of massive domestic spending cuts and reduced consumer income, undermining recovery and growth.

 

These birds can’t fly, says Rasmus. Liberal economists can’t explain how much deficit spending is needed to sustain recovery, and conservatives don’t understand that transferring wealth to corporations and super-rich elites won’t stimulate investment, job creation and growth.

 

As harder times in 2012 loom, these birds “can only run around in circles, flightless, squawking as (they) turn left, then right and back again” aimlessly.

 

On December 25, James Petras headlined his article “Unrelenting Global Economic Crisis: A Doomsday View of 2012.” He focused on what matters most – reality, not broken models or a follow the crowd mindset.

 

His view, like this writer and others not bylined where most people get news, information and opinion, is “profoundly negative.” He believes “we are heading toward a steeper decline than what was experienced during the Great Recession of 2008 – 2009.”

 

“With fewer resources, greater debt and increasing popular resistance to shouldering the burden of saving the capitalist system,” continuing to bail out banks and other corporate favorites won’t work.

 

Conditions are in disarray and worsening. Troubled Eurozone countries face collapse. So do major banks. Global crisis looms. Policy errors worsen conditions.

 

Growing protests across Europe, America, the Middle East and elsewhere threaten rebellions if corrective measures aren’t taken. Instead, populations are being force-fed austerity when stimulus is needed. When pain levels cross thresholds of no return, revolutions can erupt any time.

 

Money and Markets (MM) contributors also see a “millennial tipping point” in 2012. Martin Weiss believes Europe’s debt crisis will climax. America’s budget battle will affect financial markets. Troubled global banks “will face their Day of Reckoning,” and world populations will face harder than ever hard times.

 

Other MM contributors see unprecedented panic cycles, Eurozone dissolution, failure of the euro, gold correcting then soaring, major bank failures, a global crisis of confidence, and a protracted black hole of decline, punctuated by recoveries and steeper slumps.

 

Buckle up! Forewarned is forearmed.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Escalating Anti-Iranian Tensions

No Comments

Escalating Anti-Iranian Tensions – by Stephen Lendman

 

Whether or not anti-Iranian rhetoric, saber rattling, sanctions, other policy measures, and recent events signal war isn’t known. Growing dangers though mount.

 

America targets all independent regimes. At issue is replacing them with client ones.

 

In October, Washington falsely charged Iran with plotting to kill Saudi Arabia’s US ambassador. In November, outdated, forged, long ago discredited, and perhaps nonexistent documents were used to claim Iran’s developing nuclear weapons.

 

According to America’s latest March 2011 intelligence estimate, no credible evidence proves it. Nor was Iran involved in 9/11.

 

Nonetheless, on December 15, Manhattan Federal Judge George Daniels said he’ll sign an order accusing Iran, Hezbollah, and Al Qaeda of 9/11 responsibility.

 

In response to a lawsuit brought by family members of 9/11 victims, he claimed Iran provided material support to Al Qaeda. He based it on fake evidence and spurious testimonies from three Iranian defectors. Their affidavits remained sealed during court proceedings.

 

In late December, Daniels assessed Iran $100 billion in damages. According to attorney Dennis Pantazis:

 

“We have worked over eight years, consulted hundreds of intelligence experts, reviewed thousands of documents and reports and traveled to three continents and multiple countries to interview eyewitnesses. The ruling stands for the proposition that no matter how big or powerful evil is, it will always be revealed.”

 

His rant omitted clear evidence of CIA and Mossad involvement, not Iran, Hezbollah or Al Qaeda. Among others, David Ray Griffin‘s exhaustive research exposed the 9/11 lie.

 

On April 5, 2006, he said:

 

“It would seem, for many reasons, that the official story of 9/11, which has served as a religious Myth in the intervening years (and still does), is a myth in the pejorative sense of a story that does not correspond to reality.”

 

In his newest book titled, “9/11: Ten Years Later,” Griffin said:

 

“Getting the 9/11 lie exposed is essential. One obvious reason is simple justice,” including for 9/11 family members, deserving most of all to know. “There also needs to be justice in the sense of punishment for those who engineered this crime,” including top government, military, and intelligence officials. They’re “guilty of murder and treason.”

 

War Winds Target Iran

 

Tensions and dangers mount. A New York Times November editorial accused Iran of “pushing its nuclear program forward.” Separately, The Times called Iran’s commercial program “one of the most polarizing issues in one of the world’s most volatile regions.”

 

Without explaining why, it claimed both Bush and Obama administrations tried engaging Iran diplomatically when, in fact, they continued years of hostile relations and provocations.

 

In July 2008, Seymour Hersh said Congress agreed “to fund a major escalation of covert operations against Iran, according to current and former military, intelligence and congressional sources.”

 

At issue is destabilization. Minority Ahwazi Arab and Baluchi groups, as well as other dissident organizations are supported. Intelligence operations targeting Iran’s nuclear program remain ongoing.

 

“United States Special Operations Forces have been conducting cross-border operations from southern Iraq.” Revolutionary Guard Al Quds commandos were kidnapped and taken to Iraq for interrogation.

 

CIA and Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) operations were “significantly expanded.” Current tensions suggest these and perhaps other covert operations continue.

 

In June 2011, Hersh said despite “years of covert operations inside Iran, extensive satellite imagery, and the recruitment of many Iranian intelligence assets, the United States and its allies, including Israel, have been unable to find irrefutable evidence of (a covert) nuclear-weapons program in Iran, according to intelligence and diplomatic officials here and abroad.”

 

Of course, replacing an independent regime with a client one is at issue, not an alleged nuclear weapons program. Yet its provocatively used for possible planned conflict.

 

Hostile Rhetoric Increasing

 

Addressing a Union for Reform Judaism audience on December 16, Obama called “a nuclear Iran unacceptable” and ruled “no options off the table.” Perhaps he signaled war.

 

It wouldn’t be the first time. After extending sanctions on Gaddafi last March, he said “the bottom line is that I have not taken any options off the table at this point.” Days later, NATO began bombing.

 

On December 5, State Department arms advisor Robert Einhorn said Iran’s “violating international obligations and norms. It is becoming a pariah state….The timeline for its nuclear program is beginning to get shorter, so it is important we take these strong steps on an urgent basis.”

 

On December 7, Republican presidential aspirant Mitt Romney said, “Ultimately, (Iranian) regime change is what’s going to be necessary.” He called for “covert and overt” efforts to destabilize Tehran’s government.

 

Other Republican candidates also escalated tensions. Newt Gingrich said he’d use “covert capability” for “regime change.” Former Senator Rick Santorum said:

 

“There have been scientists turning up dead in Russia and in Iran. There have been computer viruses. There have been problems at their facility. I hope the United States has been involved with that.” Foreign scientists helping Iran are “enemy combatant(s and should be) taken out by the United States.”

 

An unnamed senior Western intelligence official told Israel News that “(t)here is deep concern within (Iran’s) senior leadership….that they will be (targeted by) a surprise military strike by either Israel of the US.”

 

According to Britain’s Daily Mail, Guardian and Independent, it’s already begun to control regional oil and gas riches.

 

On December 19, Secretary of Defense Panetta suggested Iran’s a year away for having nuclear weapons. Washington “will take whatever steps necessary to deal with it,” he said.

 

On December 20, Joint Chiefs Chairman General Martin Dempsey said “the options we are developing are evolving to a point that they would be executable, if necessary.” He added that his “biggest worry is that (Iranians) will miscalculate our resolve.”

 

On December 22, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak responded to Washington remarks, saying they “make clear a fact that was already known to us from closed-door (meetings). It makes clear to Iran that it faces a real dilemma.”

 

On December 23, former Secretary of Defense Office strategist/Council on Foreign Relations (CRF) Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow Matthew Kroenig’s CFR Foreign Affairs article advocated war titled, “Time to Attack Iran.”

 

Harvard’s Stephen Walt called his piece “a textbook example of war-wongering disguised as analysis. It is a remarkably poor piece of advocacy….This is not fair-minded ‘analysis;’ it is simply a brief for war designed to reach a predetermined conclusion.” Nonetheless, it escalated tensions further.

 

Obama Continues America’s Permanent War Agenda

 

Throughout his tenure, Obama aggressively waged war. He’s unrestrained for more. He’ll even risk regional war with unpredictable consequences. If Russia and China enter to protect their strategic interests, all bets are off.

 

For years, Washington pushed the envelope with Iran. The Bush administration authorized covert CIA destabilization. Congress appropriated $400 million for it. Obama continues similar policies.

 

Moreover, Iranian nuclear scientists were murdered. Its Atomic Energy Organization head, Fereydoun Abbasi-Davani, was wounded by bombs attached to nearby cars.

 

Last spring, Iranian intelligence discovered the Stuxnet malware computer virus infecting its Bushehr nuclear facility. At the time, its operations were halted indefinitely.

 

Israel was blamed. Washington was also implicated. Calling it a hostile act, General Gholam-Reza Jalali said if Bushehr went online infected, Iran’s entire electrical power grid could have been shut down.

 

On November 12, an explosion destroyed the Revolutionary Guard’s Bid Kaneh base. Seventeen deaths resulted, including a founder of Iran’s missile program. On November 28, another Isfahan explosion  badly damaged a uranium enrichment facility.

 

On December 4, Washington’s sophisticated stealth RQ-170 drone illegally entered Iranian airspace. Iran downed it intact by hacking into its cyber system. Its design replicates America’s B-2 stealth bomber.

 

Washington has many ways to destabilize, weaken and oust regimes. They include provocations, fake accusations, political and economic sanctions, isolation, covert or direct confrontation, and cyberwar, among other dirty tricks.

 

On December 13, House and Senate leaders agreed on legislation imposing new sanctions on Iran. They’re aimed at penalizing foreign financial institutions doing business with Tehran’s central bank. It’s the main conduit for its oil revenues. US corporations, including banks, are already prohibited from dealing with the Islamic Republic.

 

Additional measures expanded sanctions on companies doing oil related business, including investments, selling Iran refinery goods and services, and providing Tehran with refined products worth $5 million or more annually.

 

Obama’s preparing to sign the measure. If fully implemented, Iranian oil shipments may be affected. If so, energy prices will rise during global economic weakness.

 

Other measures sanctioned developing infrastructure, ports, buying Iranian sovereign debt, and companies helping Tehran, North Korea or Syria pursue nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, as well as missile development programs.

 

Navy Commander Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said Iran’s naval forces can readily block the Strait of Hormuz in response to hostile Western actions. He spoke a day after Vice President Mohammad Reza Rahimi warned not a drop of oil would pass through the Strait if Iran’s oil exports are sanctioned. If so, expect energy prices to skyrocket until normal flows resume.

 

A Final Comment

 

Obama appears inching toward more war, no matter the potentially devastating consequences, especially if nuclear weapons are used.

 

Those whom the gods wish to destroy they first make mad. Leaders ordering Syria and Iran attacked are deranged.

 

They infest political Washington and Israel. Buckle up. Anything ahead’s possible, no matter extreme dangers sensible officials wouldn’t plan, risk, or even contemplate.

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

‘JFK: The Case for Conspiracy

No Comments

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/independent-film/jfk-the-case-for-conspiracy—part-12.html

Gaza: Remembering Cast Lead

No Comments

Gaza: Remembering Cast Lead – by Stephen Lendman

 

December 27 marks the third anniversary of Israel’s lawless war on Gaza. Without provocation, three weeks of terror bombing and invasion devastated the Strip.

 

Missiles, bombs, shells, and illegal weapons were used against defenseless people. Mass slaughter and destruction followed.

 

Brazen crimes of war and against humanity were committed. Responsible officials remain unaccountable. Security Council no-fly zone protection wasn’t ordered. International leaders shared culpability through silence. They still do. Washington was complicit by supplying Israel with weapons, munitions, and encouragement.

 

Cast Lead’s one of history’s great crimes. Before his fall from grace, Richard Goldstone said:

 

“(T)here is evidence indicating serious violations of international human rights and humanitarian law were committed by Israel during the Gaza conflict, and that Israel committed actions amounting to war crimes, and possibly crimes against humanity.”

 

Over 1,400 Gazans were killed, 80% or more civilians. Thousands more were injured, many seriously, and extensive civilian infrastructure and private property were destroyed or damaged, including homes, schools, hospitals, mosques, and businesses.

 

Israel’s internal investigations whitewashed horrendous crimes. According to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR):

 

“Rather than uphold the rule of law, the Israeli investigative and judicial system is artfully manipulated to provide an illusion of investigative and judicial rigour, while systematically perpetuating pervasive impunity” for crimes too extreme to ignore.

 

For example, on April 29, 2009, then IDF Chief of Staff, General Gabi Ashkenazi authorized publication of the findings of five military investigate teams. Unsurprisingly, they concluded that:

 

“(T)throughout the fighting in Gaza, the IDF operated in accordance with international law. The IDF maintained a high professional and moral level while facing an enemy that aimed to terrorize Israeli civilians whilst taking cover amidst uninvolved civilians in the the Gaza strip and using them as human shields.”

 

In detail, they brazenly justified Israel’s crimes of war and against humanity. Human Rights Watch called them “indiscriminate, disproportionate (and) at times seemingly deliberate, in violation of the laws of war.”

 

PCHR marked the anniversary by calling December 27, 2008 “the single bloodiest day in the history of the occupation. On this day three years ago, 334 Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces.” Most were civilians, including women, children, and babies.

 

In total, 1,419 Palestinians were killed in cold blood, including 1,167 civilians (82.2%). Another 5,300 were injured. “Israeli forces directly targeted and attacked private homes and civilian institutions, including hospitals and schools.”

 

Life in besieged Gaza was devastated. Other targets struck included 3,500 homes, civilian workshops, factories, municipal buildings, charitable foundations, fishing boats, and UN facilities. In addition, farmland was bulldozed. Irrigations systems were destroyed. Under siege, reconstruction is virtually impossible.

 

PCHR submitted 490 criminal complaints to Israeli authorities on behalf of 1,046 victims. All documented grievous crimes. They demand redress and prosecution of culpable officials.

 

So far, only two substantive replies followed. Most were ignored. “If the occupation taught us anything, it is that as long as Israel is granted impunity, it will continue to violate international law. Palestinians will continue to suffer the horrific consequences,” and human suffering will remain extreme.

 

Al-Haq remembered Cast Lead’s anniversary, saying what’s to prevent it repeating! Moreover, “the international community continues to show its complete lack of political will to achieve justice for the victims who have all but abandoned such expectations.”

 

Only three Israeli soldiers received punishments too minor to matter. Not for mass slaughter and destruction, but for using a Palestinian human shield during searches and credit card theft.

 

For three years, accountability’s been entirely absent. Impunity immunizes Israel. Not only is justice delayed, it’s disdained, denied, scoffed at, and spat on. Moreover, Israel attacks Gaza regularly. Air and ground assaults repeat often. In 2011, dozens more Palestinians were killed, many others injured.

 

“By eschewing the importance of justice and accountability, the international community has merely facilitated the ongoing violation of human rights by Israel. How many more anniversaries will pass before this comes to an end?”

 

Hamas commemorated Cast Lead’s anniversary by saying Gaza’s a symbol of dignity in the face of adversity.

 

“The siege imposed on Gaza has failed to realize Israel’s goals when faced with the steadfastness and firmness of the Palestinian people,” said spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri. “Instead of being erased from the map, Gaza has become the Qibla (direction Muslims face to pray) for the free people of the world and a symbol of dignity under challenge.”

 

Press TV remembered martyrs who died during Israel’s aggression. It also noted illegal weapons used like white phosphorus bombs, able to burn flesh to the bone.

 

Russia Today said though Gaza’s war is over, the “battle for reparations continues in court. Saleh Abu Hajaj achieved a rare victory, a bitter sweet one, saying:

 

“I am a broken man. The Israelis say their army has morals. Which morals are they talking about? I couldn’t get to my home for 16 days, because the Israeli soldiers were firing all the time.”

 

“As soon as they left, I went there and inside. On the walls, the soldiers had written, ‘You’ll find the bodies 50 meters away.’ I found the body of my mother, buried in the sand, and the body of my sister, Majda, covered with some bricks.”

 

Salah Talala al-Samoumi’s had no redress three years after filing a claim. His mother was blown apart. His two-year old daughter, father, aunt, cousin, and entire family were killed by rocket and shell fire. No one was held accountable.

 

China’s xinhaunet.com remembered Cast Lead’s horrors, including on December 27 when hundreds alone were killed.

 

Western media scoundrels were silent. Unswervingly they support Israel’s worst crimes.

 

Not Gaza’s Center for Political and Development Studies Yousef Aljamal, saying:

 

He and his youngest sister hate war. “She could never forget the sounds of American-made F16s raiding Gaza’s only power plant, burning it to ashes, which happened close to our house. I could not forget her screaming….”

 

When war began, he was studying for final exams. Electricity went out. Many hundreds were killed. “We are not numbers. We are stories. We are feelings. We are Iman Hijjo sitting in her mother’s arms and breastfeeding when the bomb tore her small innocent smile apart.”

 

“We are Mohammed Al-Durra, hiding behind his dad’s arms bleeding, while his very dad screams tearfully: The boy died by a bullet. We are the Al-Samouni family,” told to move to a tiny room for safety. “The next day, the entire family was erased….We are not invented numbers, sir.”

 

Remember Cast Lead and besieged Gaza’s 1.6 million people on this and every day. Their suffering is ours. Only mass public outrage can end it!

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Wrecking America’s Postal Service

No Comments

Wrecking America’s Postal Service – by Stephen Lendman

 

At a time of open-checkbook military spending, multiple imperial wars, Wall Street bailouts, handouts to other corporate favorites, transferring unprecedented wealth to America’s rich, and preserving their tax cuts and other benefits for more, austerity is impoverishing millions, destroying their futures, and wrecking America’s Postal Service (USPS).

 

The 1970 Postal Reorganization Act (PRA) made the Postal Service self-sustaining. It was exempted from the general budget, funding laws, and executive branch control. It’s run as an independent federal agency on its own.

 

During the 1970s and 1980s, by administrative decision, it was at times included and excluded from executive budgetary consideration, depending on whether surpluses or deficits occurred.

 

In the 1989 Omnibus Reconciliation Act, it was put permanently off-budget. Congress made it independently self-financing. Since then (with no federal funding), it shared off-budget status with the Social Security Trust Fund, supplemental military allocations, and black Pentagon and intelligence ones.

 

In early December, USPS announced closure of over half its mail processing centers, 28,000 job cuts, and ending overnight first-class mail delivery.

 

Beginning in March, cuts will take effect. Standards in place for over 40 years will end. First-class mail will take two or three days, not one. Second class for newspapers and magazines, third class bulk mail, and fourth class will take much longer.

 

Pensioners dependent on benefit checks to pay bills, anyone buying drugs and other essentials by mail, and businesses needing prompt delivery to operate effectively will be impacted.

 

According to a Postal Regulatory Commission (PRC) Retail Access Optimization Initiative (RAOI) Advisory Opinion, so will rural America.

 

RAOI says small post office closures aren’t about “rationalizing” the network as savings achieved are minimal. At issue is breaking the bond between small communities and USPS and hastening privatization to make delivery services another profit center instead of a public service.

 

Currently, USPS generates about $62 billion annually in revenues. Corporate America wants them. Donahue serves their interests. So do union bosses.

 

They agreed to past work force reductions. In 1999, USPS employed over 900,000. Today it’s around 600,000, a nearly one-third drop, including attrition of over 100,000 under Obama.

 

On November 21, USPS Postmaster General/CEO Patrick Donahue’s National Press Club speech was interrupted with calls, saying:

 

“Hey, hey, ho, ho, Donahue has got to go,” and “Don’t privatize the post office. It’s a public service. It’s not a profit center for Fed Ex and UPS to rip off the people. Return the overpaid pension funds….Stop closing post offices.”

 

Outside the building protesters yelled, “This is what democracy looks like,” and “We are the 99%.”

 

Donahue claims mail delivery downgrading will save $2.1 billion annually. Other cuts will save $20 billion by 2015, he says. He also wants Congress to end no-layoff union contract clauses for career employees, halt retiree healthcare and pension contributions, and impose other anti-worker measures.

 

If fully implemented, his scheme will wreck USPS. However, claiming a fiscal crisis is duplicitous. USPS serves 150 million households and businesses daily. Operating as an independent US government agency, it’s America’s second largest employer after Wal-Mart.

 

It’s not troubled by Internet competition or changed letter-writing habits. It’s because Congress forced USPS to pay about $5.5 billion annually into a trust fund for future retiree healthcare and pension benefits.

 

It’s currently over-funded by $75 billion. Moreover, USPS is burdened with other charges and obligations. As a result, it appears troubled. Treating the System equitably and fairly would change things. Instead, slash and burn is planned.

 

On December 7, Ralph Nader‘s article headlined, “Time to Save the Post Office,” saying:

 

It’s “headling for a free fall due to bad management, corporate barracudas, and a bevy of editors and reporters enamoured with the supremacy of the Internet which makes up their world.”

 

Donahue’s strategy stresses cuts, service delays, and higher prices. That’s a “sure description for continuing decline….He mistakenly thinks closing additional USPS facilities” won’t affect revenues.

 

At issue is no federal funding combined and billions paid annually for future retirees as explained above. Congress is considering corrective legislative action. Without it, USPS will face greater losses.

 

It’s the only federal government creditor, operating as a hybrid public corporation. At the same time, it’s “been run into the ground on the installment plan by commercial competitors aggressively taking advantage of” bad management under a corporate Board of Governors “ideologically rooting for corporate privatizers.”

 

When Nader asked Donahue how he’ll increase revenues, no response followed. “Postal Regulatory Commission Chairperson Ruth Goldway proposed about two dozen ways.”

 

Other good ideas circulate. Instead of managing counterproductively, competing effectively with Fed Ex, UPS, and other express delivery operators should be prioritized. Congress also shares blame by restricting USPS services.

 

But that’s no excuse for “long lines, long phone delays, other mismatches between staff and levels of fluctuating business,” and other troubling issues, including excessive time spent on cutting, abandoning, closing, delaying and outsourcing services to Wal-Mart and K-Mart locations.

 

Edited by New York University Professor Steve Hutkins, Save the Post Office.com (SPO) supports saving and improving a vital service. The site has information on closures, consolidations, properties sold, constructive preservation efforts, and what ordinary people can do to help. It also has thoughtful analysis and opinions.

 

In a December 7 New York Times op ed, Hutkins said closing post offices and cutting staff won’t “hasten the Postal Service’s downward spiral.”

 

Toughening user conditions will force them elsewhere for better alternatives. Moreover, declining revenues assure more cuts until the system’s entirely degraded and replaced by private operators at much greater expense for small users.

 

“The so-called ‘crisis’ we’re witnessing is a manufactured emergency, a strategy of ‘shock and awe’ designed to finish the job started in 1970, when the Department of the Post Office was turned into a government agency (made to) act ‘like a business.’ ”

 

Today, privatization is planned. European countries did it. Anti-government/anti-union/corporatist/hard-right business and government ideologues want it.

 

Bulk mail industry shareholders, Fed Ex, UPS, and other delivery services urge it. Hutkins, like Nader and others, say saving the Postal Service requires Congress to stop assessing USPS $5 billion annually for retiree benefits. Moreover, some or the entire $75 billion overfunding amount must be rebated.

 

Doing so will make USPS fiscally sound. As a result, it’ll be able to expand services and benefit everyone, not just large business mailers. Instead of downsizing, the Postal Service “should reduce its outsourcing to private companies (now getting $12 billion in business). Much of that work could be done” internally.

 

Radical downsizing won’t save USPS. It’ll destroy it. It’ll also cause “irrevocable harm” to thousands of postal worker families and communities nationwide. “Wake up America,” says Hutkins. “They’re coming for the post office.”

 

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

 

Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

 

http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.

Blue Taste Theme created by Jabox