http://www.manufacturing-dissent.com/Watch_Online.html
Produced by journalists Lizzie Phelan and Mostafa Afzalzadeh.
Edited by Lizzie Phelan.
http://www.manufacturing-dissent.com/Watch_Online.html
Produced by journalists Lizzie Phelan and Mostafa Afzalzadeh.
Edited by Lizzie Phelan.
by Stephen Lendman
On June 27, the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) discussed conflict conditions in Syria. Truth took a back seat. Some present denounced its absence.
Pre-scripted, its conclusions were predictable. Washington calls the shots. Most HRC members salute and obey.
Syrian HRC representative Faisal Khabbaz al-Hamwi denounced the proceedings. Calling them useless and politically biased, he said its report reflects a “disinformation war against Syria.” He walked out of the session, saying:
“We will not participate in this flagrantly political meeting.”
He had good reason to leave. Before doing so he said national reconciliation can only happen when “foreign powers stopped inciting violence. The crisis in Syria (is) genuine war and a criminal operation involving destruction of property.”
It’s not about “legitimate demands for reform.” It’s about lawlessly supporting regime change. It’s to replace Assad with a pro-Western puppet.
Washington had that in mind for years. Independent governments aren’t tolerated. America has longstanding plans to oust them for subservient vassal ones.
Syria’s insurgency is supported and financed from abroad. It promotes anarchy and disorder. It ignores how Israel persecutes Arabs and Turkey wages war on Kurds.
It avoids discussing Gulf states’ crimes against their own people and involvement in Washington’s war on Syria.
“A war of minds and bombs is taking place. Gunmen have been carrying out terrorist acts on Syrian cities. Such activities by gunmen and terrorists is being fed with money and weapons from abroad,” he explained.
“How could some sides pretend to be worried about the Syrian people and at the same time arming the terrorists and conspiring against the Syrians.”
“Had these sides been honest, they would have supported Annan’s plan and urged all sides to hold a constructive national dialogue,” he added.
Vasily Nebenya, Russian Foreign Ministry Human Rights Director, said the HRC’s report on Houla killings doesn’t reflect facts on the ground.
HRC’s account “indicates to the tension of the situation where this massacre benefited powers which have interest in destabilizing the situation before debating the Syrian file at the UN Security Council.”
High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay spurned her mandate. Instead of responsibly “strengthening the promotion and protection of human rights,” she spurned them in deference to Western interests.
She said conditions in Syria continue to deteriorate. She called them “alarming.” She pointed fingers the wrong way. She ignored Western-sponsored massacres and other atrocities. She blamed Assad, not foreign mercenaries. Since March last year, they’ve been ravaging the country.
In September 2011, Paulo Pinheiro was appointed Chairman of a three-member International Commission of Inquiry for Syria.
Its mandate is investigating human rights abuses. His reports bear testimony to his bias. Like Pillay, he represents Western interests, not truth and full disclosure.
His earlier reports blamed Assad for insurgent crimes against humanity. He claimed soldiers were shooting unarmed protesters. Arrests were made without cause. Civilian neighborhoods were indiscriminately attacked.
His accounts came right out of the anti-Gaddafi playbook. They lack credibility. He said insurgents also committed crimes but on a much smaller scale. He lied. He’s paid to lie. His new report repeated the earlier pattern.
Again he pointed fingers the wrong way. He called conditions “on the ground dangerously and quickly deteriorating.”
“In the increasingly militarized context, human rights violations are occuring across the country on an alarming scale during military operations against locations believed to be hosting defectors and/or those perceived as affiliated with anti-government armed groups, including the Free Syrian Army.”
He ignored credible eye-witness testimonies. He fabricated accounts and conclusions. He discussed the May 25 Houla massacre.
He said it’s “unlikely that anti-Government fighters were responsible….and considered that Syrian Government forces or those loyal to them were the most likely perpetrators.”
Russian journalist Marat Musin published firsthand observations of what happened. He exposed scoundrel media misinformation and lies.
Western-enlisted death squads bore full responsibility. Government forces and/or so-called pro-Assad shabbiha had no involvement.
Pro-Assad loyalists were murdered. Targeting them was cold, calculated, and well-planned. In two earlier June articles, Germany’s Frankfurther Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) published facts, not misinformation on what happened. It blamed insurgents, not government forces or pro-Assad elements.
Documentation based on credible eye witnesses reconstructed events accurately. Survivors pointed fingers the right way. Anti-Assad elements were interviewed. They claimed responsibility. FAZ kept their names confidential. At issue is potential reprisals.
Pinheiro’s report claimed “no doubt as to what was happening on the ground and identified the Syrian authorities as carrying a clear and definite responsibility in this regard.”
It said Assad is “unwilling or unable to investigate and prosecute crimes….” It endorsed Pillay’s request for the Security Council to refer responsible government officials to the International Criminal Court (ICC) for prosecution.
At HRC’s emergency June 1 meeting, she blamed Assad for Houla killings, saying:
“These acts may amount to crimes against humanity and other international crimes and may be indicative of a pattern of widespread or systematic attacks against civilian populations that have been perpetrated with impunity.”
“I reiterate that those who order, assist or fail to stop attacks on civilians are individually criminally liable for their actions.”
Ahead of the meeting, Washington, Turkey and Qatar submitted a joint draft resolution to the HRC. It condemned “the wanton killings of civilians by shooting at close range and by severe physical abuse by pro-regime elements and a series of government artillery and tank shellings of a residential neighborhood.”
On June 1, the HRC blamed Assad for Houla killings. A final resolution was adopted. Forty-one voted yes. Russia, China and Cuba rejected one-way responsibility. Two nations abstained.
Responsible insurgents weren’t mentioned. Assad was accused of failing “to protect and promote the rights of all Syrians, including through systematic and repeated violations of human rights.”
It called for holding guilty parties accountable. It shamelessly blamed victims, not perpetrators. It ignored facts based on credible eyewitness testimonies.
Instead it published misinformation and bald-faced lies. Doing so makes nations blaming Assad and HRC officials complicit with insurgent crimes.
On June 28, HRC members will resume discussions on Syria. Dialogue on other matters will be held. Later in the day, closed door meetings will follow. It’s unclear whether what’s considered will be revealed.
Conclusions from previous HRC emergency sessions on Syria also blamed Assad for insurgent crimes. Doing so destroys its credibility. Instead of fulfilling its mandate, it spurned it.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
by Stephen Lendman
On June 22, Reuters headlined “Turkish jet downed by Syria air defenses: report,” saying:
According to Lebanon’s Al-Manar television, “Syrian air defenses shot down a Turkish military aircraft, quoting Syrian security sources.”
Reportedly it was an F-4 Phantom fighter bomber. First introduced in 1960, McDonnell Aircraft produced it. It was used extensively during the Vietnam war. More advanced aircraft replaced it long ago.
A pilot and navigator were on board.
Turkey regularly patrols airspace close to Syria’s border.
Al-Manar headlined “Crisis Meeting in Turkey after Losing Contact with Military Jet near Syria,” saying:
Turkey’s military said it “lost radio contact with one of its aircraft on the Mediterranean near neighboring Syria.”
At 7:30 GMT, the plane left Malatya airbase. At 8:58GMT, communication was lost “in the southwest of the Hatay province bordering Syria….”
Search and rescue efforts began. It’s unconfirmed officially if the plane crashed or was shot down. Its pilot and navigator were reported unharmed.
“Malatya governor Ulvi Saran told the Anatolia news agency that it was a F-4 plane with two pilots onboard….”
In response to the incident, AFP said Turkey convened a crisis meeting.
Other reports are circulating. Russia Today (RT.com) said Syria apologized to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Erdogan for downing its aircraft.
Turkey’s Hurrieyet daily reported the same story. It headlined “Syria apologizes for taking down Turkish warplane: Turkish PM,” saying:
“Eyewitnesses in the northern Syrian town of Latakia told BBC Arabic that Syrian air defences shot down an unidentified aircraft near the town of Ras al-Baseet.”
An “official Turkish source” said Syrian forces shot it down.
Early Friday, the plane crashed into Syrian waters. A missile reportedly destroyed it. Hurriyet said Turkish helicopters rescued two crew members.
Other reports suggest they were taken captive.
“Unconfirmed reports (said) Syrian defense forces had been shooting at two foreign planes.”
Local correspondent Ihab Sultan told Russia Today (RT.com):
“Witnesses spotted two jets flying in from Turkish territory. One of the planes went down in Syria’s territorial waters, while the other one made off.”
Mossad-connected DEBKAfile provocatively said “Syrian anti air defenses shot the plane down in an ambush calculated to retaliate for the defection of the Syrian Air Force pilot Col. Hassan Maray al-Hamadeh to Jordan a day earlier with his MiG-21 warplane.”
“Officials in Damascus are certain his defection was organized by US and Turkish intelligence.”
At 16:00 local time, two Turkish military aircraft entered Syrian airspace over Latakia. They were “lying low in threatening formation.” One was struck and destroyed. The other escaped.
Dam Press and other Syrian news agencies “speculated that the intruders were either Turkish or Israeli.”
“Since Thursday, Syria’s entire air fleet has been grounded while its spy agencies screen flight personnel for more potential defectors.”
Turkey’s Today’s Zaman headlined “Report: Syria shoots down Turkish warplane.”
It published an earlier Reuters report.
Turkey’s a NATO member. It could invoke NATO Charter Articles 4 or 5.
Article 4 calls for members to “consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territorial integrity, political independence, or security of any” is threatened.
Article 5 considers an armed attack (real or otherwise) against one or more members, an attack against all, and calls for collective self-defense.
Whether the incident was accidental or provocative remains to be determined. Given ongoing crisis conditions and tense Turkish/Syrian relations, events going forward bear watching.
Wars begin for less.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
by Stephen Lendman
Destructive neoliberal mandates harm US and European societies. Canada’s conservative government force-feeds similar policies.
They include wage and benefit cuts, less social spending, privatization of state resources, mass layoffs, deregulation, tax cuts for corporations and super-rich elites, and harsh crackdowns against resisters.
It’s also about sharply hiking college tuition fees, student anger, and criminalizing public responses. More on that below.
In the 1980s, it was called Reaganomics, trickle down, and Thatcherism. In the 1990s, it was “shock therapy.” Today, it’s austerity. The result is unprecedented wealth transfers to corporate favorites and privileged elites.
Capital’s divine rights are prioritized. Social justice is on the chopping block for elimination. Living standards are sacrificed. Ordinary people lose out. Vital services are cut. Human needs go begging. Unemployment and poverty soar. So does rage for change.
Years ago Canada lost its moorings. In December 1984, conservative prime minister, Brian Mulroney, addressed policies that began in the 1970s. Speaking before the New York Economic Club, he announced:
“Canada is open for business.”
He meant US companies were welcome. Both countries cooperated for greater economic integration. Corporate interests were prioritized. Ordinary people lost out.
Oh Canada took on new meaning. Sacrificing pluralist Canadian democracy and social justice traditions became policy. Major parties formed consensus the way Democrats and Republicans do in America.
Neoliberal harshness was institutionalized. The conservative Harper government stiffened earlier policies. It serves Canada’s ruling class. Finance capital is dominant. What big money wants it gets. Corporate power overall makes policy.
Canada shifted hard right under Mulroney. Harper institutionalized it further. Last January, he addressed Davos World Economic Forum participants. He pledged “transformative” pro-business policies.
They include more tax cuts, privatizations, deregulation, and austerity hitting ordinary people hardest. “We will do more, much more,” he promised.
Socio-economic policies established represent some of much more to come. Social Canada was hardest hit. Rights for ordinary Canadians no longer matter.
Last March, Canada’s House of Commons passed budget cuts and austerity measures on top of others enacted earlier.
They included eliminating thousands of public sector jobs, cutting billions from federal programs, raising the retirement age to 67, and calling federal debt the problem to be addressed. It’s the same canard America and European countries use to justify neoliberal harshness.
Canadian social justice follows the same downward trajectory as America and across Europe. Eliminating it altogether is planned. Higher education is affected. Once it was affordable. No longer for many as tuition and fees soar.
Last winter, Quebec’s Liberal government announced tuition fee increases over the next five years of around 75% (or $1,625). Stiff annual increases are policy. Other measures slashed vital services and benefits. Thousands of students reacted.
In mid-February, protests and strikes began. One of three provincial student associations initiated them: the Coalition large de l’association pour une solidarite syndicale etudiante (CLASSE: the Broader Coalition of the Association of Student-Union Solidarity).
Others joined in: FEUQ (the Quebec Federation of University Students) and FECQ (Quebec Federation of College Students).
Thousands swelled to 200,000 or more. Most Quebecers support them. Sharp tuition and fee increases force students and families into debt. Others drop out. Available aid is meager compared to years earlier. Higher education grows more unaffordable.
Students react by strikes and protests. They continue into their fourth month. Police confront them. Clashes and arrests follow. The usual pattern repeats against all social justice demonstrations. Legitimate struggles are criminalized.
Money power decides what’s right or wrong. Ordinary people haven’t a chance. In neoliberal societies like Canada, young people have most to lose. Increasingly shut out of higher education, decent jobs, and bright futures, fighting back remains their only option.
Criminalizing dissent became policy. On May 18, Quebec’s Liberal government passed Bill 78. Provisions prohibit student protests or other “form(s) of gathering” within 50 meters of the “outer limits” of the “grounds” of any university or CEGEP (College of general and vocational education) building.
In Quebec, high school ends at grade 11. Completing CEGEP grades 12 and 13 are required for college or university admission. Doing it successfully earns them DECs (dioplomes d’etudes collegial).
CEGEPs also offer three-year programs in vocational studies, computer science, nursing, and other fields. With DEC credits, Bachelor’s degrees can be completed in three years. Supporters and critics disagree on the system’s merits or disadvantages. It’s unique to Quebec.
Bill 78 also requires student associations, unions representing teachers, and CEBEP staff to “employ appropriate means to induce” compliance with enacted measures or face prosecution.
Article 9 authorizes the Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports to modify any law to ensure school sessions throughout the bill’s time frame.
All demonstrations exceeding 50 people were declared illegal without provincial police approval. Offenders face daily fines. A date for education employees to return to work was established.
Winter semester classes at 11 universities and 14 CEGEPs were suspended. Completing them by August or September was mandated. The law expires July 1, 2013. It’s patently illegal.
The 1982 Constitution Act established the Constitution of Canada. It contains a bill of rights called The Charter of Rights and Freedoms. It states:
“Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.”
Article 7 assures “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person and the right not to be deprived thereof in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.”
Academic and speech freedoms are fundamental in free societies. So are public assembly and association rights. Without them, all others are threatened.
Howard Zinn called dissent “the highest form of patriotism.” Voltaire said, “I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”
Jefferson said, “The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive.”
Bill 78 violates Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms. So does a newly passed Montreal City Council ordinance criminalizing face paint, niqads, and other face or head coverings while demonstrating.
On May 22, it was invoked. Baton-wielding police confronted downtown Montreal protesters violently.
Tear gas was used. Dozens were arrested. Charges claimed protesters wore illegal masks and/or confronted police violently.
On May 21, confrontations occurred in Sherbrooke. It’s Quebec Premier Jean Charest’s home city. Dozens of arrests followed. Charges included demonstrating illegally.
A Final Comment
Student anger shows no signs of ebbing. Social justice rights are too important to sacrifice. Affordable education is vital. Resolution is nowhere in sight. Quebec officials are determined to force-feed austerity. They include stiff annual tuition and fee hikes.
Students are on their own. Union officials sold out to power. Who knows where this ends. Hopefully working Canadians will join them. Social justice includes more than affordable education.
Class war rages in Canada and other Western societies. Governments serve wealth and power. Eroding social justice heads faster toward total elimination. Popular interests suffer.
Ordinary people face neo-serfdom, debt peonage, and police state harshness for resisting. Fighting back is the only chance for change.
A long struggle remains. In fact, it’s just begun. Staying the course is key. It’s how all great victories are won. They never come easily or quickly. Hopefully Quebec students understand and won’t quit. There’s too much at stake.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour.
Waging Total War on Islam
by Stephen Lendman
When asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton said that’s where the money is. Washington targets the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia because it’s where most proved oil and gas reserves are.
Waging war require enemies. Pretexts create them. Muslims are demonized as threats. They’re portrayed as culturally inferior, dirty, lecherous, untrustworthy, religiously fanatical, and violent. Slanderous media commentaries suggest gun-totting terrorists threatening US interests.
Fear is heightened. Strategically timed false flag terror plots make headlines. So do arrests of entrapped Muslims despite no evidence of crime or intent to commit one.
Americans are manipulated to believe domestic and foreign jihadists threaten national security. Resource wars follow.
Enemies are dehumanized. Military training creates Groupthink. Recruits are manipulated to hate. Indoctrination involves sensitizing them to become effective combat killing machines.
On May 10, wired.com contributors Noah Shachtman and Spencer Ackerman headlined “US Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam,” saying:
Total war is taught to protect America from Islamic terrorists. Options include destroying an entire “civilian population wherever necessary.”
The Norfolk, VA-based Joint Forces Staff College taught “Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism.” High-ranking officers were instructed to believe “Islam had already declared war on the West.”
A wired.com Danger Room investigation revealed it. Damage control followed. Lt. General George Flynn in charge of training and education said:
“It was inflammatory….(T)hat’s really not what we’re talking about. That is not how we view this situation or the challenges we have in the world today.”
The White House ordered counterterrorism training content reviewed. The “Perspectives” course was taught since 2004. It “not only evaded review, but had defenders in the Joint Forces Staff College (who) taught it.”
Lecturer Stephen Coughlin taught that “Islamic law is a danger to US national security.” College spokesman Steven Williams said around 90% of students considered course content “mostly positive.”
After revisions were made last year, some officers objected to offensive material. According to Flynn:
“We looked at it and we found the material to be objectionable and we started digging into it to see, how did the course get this way?”
“Possibly, we did not follow the procedures we should have followed in academically approving the course, but that’ll be formally determined when we complete the inquiry into this.”
Course content allegedly had to follow “White House-approved guidelines issued by the Department of Homeland Security to prevent anti-Islam material from being taught by the US government.”
Flynn said “whatever action is warranted” will be done to assure compliance.
On May 10, Joint Chiefs Chairman General Martin Dempsey said instructor Lt. Colonel Matthew A. Dooley remains on Norfolk’s staff but is “no longer in a teaching status.”
He taught content about waging total war on Muslim civilians “wherever necessary.” He likened it to firebombing Dresden and Hiroshima/Nagasaki destruction. Other course lecturers encouraged students “to think of themselves as a ‘resistance movement’ to Islam.”
Demsey and Flynn “pulled the plug on the course last month.” An investigation began. Major General Frederick Rudesheim heads it. “Final judgment” awaits his findings.
“The military is hardly alone in dealing with anti-Islam instructional material passing itself off as responsible counterterrorism.”
“Over the years, hundreds of documents claiming ‘mainstream’ Muslims are ‘violent’ have made their way into FBI curricula, alongside internal claims that agents working on counterterrorism cases could ‘bend or suspend the law.’ ”
The Bureau teaches agents that “mainstream” Muslims are “violent,” that Islam “ma(kes) its followers want to commit ‘genocide,’ ” and an “FBI intelligence analyst compared Islam to the Death Star from Star Wars.”
An internal investigation followed. Conclusions weren’t revealed. Allegedly this type content was removed from course content. It compared the “Arab World” to the “Western Mind.”
It said Westerners were even-tempered. Emotional outbursts were “exceptional.” Arab “Outburst(s) and Loss of Control (are) Expected.”
Post-9/11, Muslims have been systematically targeted. In 2011, a New York University School of Law Center for Human Rights and Global Justice (CHR&GJ) report titled “Targeted and Entrapped: Manufacturing the ‘Homegrown Threat’ in the United States” explained Muslim persecution in detail.
Ruthless targeting entraps them. Paid informants infest mosques and communities. Many dozens are pursued on bogus charges. Invented plots are foiled in the nick of time. Media scoundrels headline them to heighten fear.
Muslims are portrayed as “potential threats” or “homegrown terrorists.” Federal, state and local law enforcement officials consider them more likely to become terrorists, easily radicalized, and compelled to commit violence in the name of Islam.
Counterterrorism policies mandate identifying and stopping them before they act.
Research, of course, contradicts these notions. Claiming Muslims “hate us” is spurious. Nonetheless, their cultural and religious practices are cited as indicators of potential terrorism. As a result, they’re maliciously persecuted for political advantage.
Obama’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FBI, and Justice Department (DOJ) embrace racist radicalization notions. They’re used as justification to entrap innocent victims with “preventive” policing despite no evidence of wrongdoing.
Instead of pursuing real criminals, they target people for their faith, religious practices, ethnicity, national origin, political views, or appearance. Lawless tactics entrap them. They include paid informants, surveillance, and inducing, influencing, or provoking potential or actual crimes that otherwise wouldn’t have been committed.
FBI Domestic Investigative Operational Guidelines (DIOGs) are bent without supervisory approval or constraints to permit virtually anything.
The 2003 Department of Justice (DOJ) Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies bans racial and ethnic profiling. Nonetheless, it implicitly permits doing so for faith and national origin purposes. It also allows targeting anyone for national and border security related issues.
Post-9/11, entrapment and other abuses became policy. They remain so. No link whatever connects religion, ethnicity, national origin, or political views to a propensity to commit violence.
However, most convictions result from bogusly conflating them as proof of intent or predisposition. As a result, innocent victims rot in America’s gulag. Justice is systematically denied. In an environment of hate and fear, no one is safe. Most of all, Muslims are public enemy number one.
Pentagon damage control casts a veil over policy. Joint Forces Staff College course content changes (whether or not implemented) obscure the greater problem.
Vilifying enemies is longstanding. Military training features dehumanization. Anti-Japanese WW II epithets and images were grotesque.
North Koreans were called “gooks” and “zipperheads.”
Vietnamese were also “gooks,” as well as “dinks” and “slopes.” Arabs are called “ragheads” and “sand niggers.” Native Americans were called plundering, murdering savages. Common epithets today marginalize Blacks and Latinos.
Dehumanization facilitates warmaking. It also desensitizes law enforcement agents to target Muslims and other designated state enemies. Doing the wrong thing works best when Groupthink becomes policy.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
Another Foiled False Flag
by Stephen Lendman
Wikipedia defines false or black flags as “covert operations designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities.”
“The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is: flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations and can be used during peace-time.”
Big lies substitute for truth. Stories are fabricated. Media scoundrels promote them. At issue is heightening fear for planned policies. Pretexts are needed for militarism, imperial wars, and homeland repression. If and when people learn they were duped, it’s too late to matter.
It’s an American tradition. Incidents are strategically timed. Innocent victims suffer. So does everyone living under heightened national security state conditions.
Threats are manufactured. States of emergency are declared. Rule of law principles are discarded. Unchallenged dominance alone matters. Wars on humanity follow. Big lies facilitate them. False flags play their part.
Here we go again. This one’s a sequel. Perhaps Hollywood blockbusters will follow, first the original plot, then the latest. More on the earlier one below.
On May 7, AP headlined “US: CIA thwarts new al-Qaida underwear bomb plot,” saying:
Agents foiled “an ambitious plot by al-Qaida’s affiliate in Yemen to destroy a US-bound airliner using a bomb with a sophisticated new design around the one-year anniversary of the killing of Osama bin Laden, The Associated Press has learned.”
AP described an upgraded underwear bomb plot. Like the earlier one, it was “designed to be used in a passenger’s underwear, but this time” US officials called it “more refined.”
On May 7, the FBI issued a brief statement, saying:
“As a result of close cooperation with our security and intelligence partners overseas, an improvised explosive device (IED) designed to carry out a terrorist attack has been seized abroad.”
“The FBI currently has possession of the IED and is conducting technical and forensics analysis on it. Initial exploitation indicates that the device is very similar to IEDs that have been used previously by al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in attempted terrorist attacks, including against aircraft and for targeted assassinations.”
“The device never presented a threat to public safety, and the US government is working closely with international partners to address associated concerns with the device.”
“We refer you to the Department of Homeland Security, including the Transportation Security Administration, regarding ongoing security measures to safeguard the American people and the traveling public.”
The device contained no metal. It’s not clear if body scanners could have detected it. Officials said an alleged Yemen-based bomber hadn’t yet picked a target or bought plane tickets. CIA agents seized the device before he had a chance. The suspect wasn’t identified.
AP learned of the plot earlier but agreed to White House and CIA requests to delay publishing because intelligence operations were ongoing.
On May 8, the White House and FBI confirmed AP’s report. Deputy national security council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden said Obama knew last month. “The disruption of the IED plot underscores the necessity of remaining vigilant against terrorism here and abroad,” she said.
“While the president was assured that the device did not pose a threat to the public, he directed the department of homeland security and law enforcement and intelligence agencies to take whatever steps necessary to guard against this type of attack,” she added.
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesman Matt Chandler said:
The latest plot “demonstrates our adversaries’ interest in targeting the aviation sector.” Protective “layers” are thus used.
They “include threat and vulnerability analysis, prescreening and screening of passengers using the best available technology, random searches at airports, federal air marshal coverage, and additional security measures both seen and unseen.”
“It’s not clear who built the bomb,” AP reported. Authorities “suspect it was the work of master bomb maker Ibrahim Hassan al-Asiri.” A Saudi citizen, he’s one of their most wanted. Earlier he was imprisoned and released.
He’s reportedly in Yemen with his brother Abdullah. He’s another Saudi most wanted. Washington claims they’re both Al Qaeda connected. He’s blamed for earlier bomb plots.
On March 24, 2011, the State Department included Ibrahim on its terrorist watch list. He’s also on an Interpol Orange Notice one. It “warns police and other international organizations about potential threats from disguised weapons, parcel bombs, or other dangerous materials.”
Washington considers Yemen strategically important. It’s mostly for its location near the Horn of Africa on Saudi Arabia’s southern border, the Red Sea, and Bab el- Mandeb strait.
It’s a key chokepoint separating Yemen from Eritrea. Around three million barrels of oil pass through it daily. The Gulf of Aden connects to the Indian Ocean. Since 2009, Obama waged drone war on the country. CIA and Special Forces operate on the ground. Death squads are deployed.
America’s at war with Yemen without declaring it. Predator drones escalate killing. Media scoundrels say little. Yemen gets attention when foiled bomb plots are claimed. They’re pretexts for stepped up measures there and at home.
Washington’s targets are global. US citizens share risks with foreign ones. Waging war on humanity leaves no one safe. Everyone everywhere is fair game. Any place could erupt in free-fire zone violence. Anyone can be accused of terrorism or conspiracy to commit it.
America’s hegemonic ambitions threaten humanity. Too few at home understand. Public ignorance and indifference let Washington get away with murder. It’s a global killing machine to remove all challenges.
The Earlier Underwear Bomber False Flag
It was fake like the sequel. In December 2009, US officials claimed Nigerian citizen Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab traveled to Yemen, got Al Qaeda training, and explosive PETN chemicals.
Supposedly he tried using them to blow up an Amsterdam-Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day. In fact, he was a fall guy for a joint CIA/Mossad/India Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) false flag.
The same alliance staged coordinated 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. Dozens were killed and hundreds wounded. They also were behind former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto’s 2007 assassination.
The same issue then remains US policy now. Destabilizing and balkanizing Pakistan is planned. It’s also perhaps intended for Afghanistan and Libya. Iraq’s already divided. Always it’s for easier control and exploitation.
Abdulmutallab was a convenient patsy. He was used to facilitate America’s war on Yemen. Britain denied him an entrance visa. His name was on a State Department terror watch list.
Yet he wasn’t on a No Fly List. He paid cash for a one-way ticket to Detroit, checked no luggage, had a US visa but no passport, and was helped onboard by a “well-dressed Indian” gentleman (a RAW agent) to facilitate Washington’s scheme to use him as a convenient dupe.
His PETN was virtually harmless. It was technically deficient, failed to go off properly, and had fire cracker strength. Following the incident, Washington’s war on Yemen escalated and enhanced airport screening began. Full body scanners the ACLU calls “virtual strip search(es)” are used.
False flags create opportunities to advance America’s imperium. They also facilitate its war on dissent. In May 2011, three key Patriot Act powers were extended for another four years. Little debate assured swift passage. As a result:
(1) Unlimited roving wiretaps continue unchecked.
(2) Section 215 pertains to alleged suspects. It authorizes government access to “any tangible item.” They included financial records and transactions, student and medical records, phone conversations, emails, other Internet use, and whatever else Washington claims essential.
(3) Alleged suspect organizations and individuals can be surveilled, whether or not evidence links them to terrorism or complicity to commit it. In other words, police state powers to monitor anyone for any reason or none at all remain unchecked.
Racial profiling and waging war on Islam got boosts. Abdulmutallab benefitted Washington at his own expense. Expect the underwear bomb sequel to provide more.
Washington will take full advantage. Perhaps Obama has another war in mind.
A Final Comment
On May 8, The New York Times headlined “Rare Double Agent Disrupted Bombing Plot, US says.”
Most likely it’s double-dealing official lies and misreporting. According to Times-speak, a Saudi intelligence agent “infiltrated (a) terrorist group and volunteered for the mission, American and foreign officials said Tuesday.”
Washington claims he provided an “innovative bomb” designed for “aviation attack.” The Times reported the story without checking for reliability. If official sources say it, accounts follow true or false.
The agent is back in Saudi Arabia, The Times said. CIA agents were involved.
What’s true or false isn’t clear. What’s certain is another false flag for reasons similar to previous ones. They repeat well-timed for strategic advantage.
They’re manufactured to look real. Media scoundrels headline them. Most people don’t know they’ve been had. The scam repeats because it works. No wonder America gets away with murder and much more.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour.
United Methodist Church Rejects Divestment
by Stephen Lendman
Doing the right thing is easy. Doing it wrong takes effort. It also belies some groups’ moral values.
UMC “emphasi(zes) Christian living (by) putting faith and love into action.” On May 2, they were noticeably absent.
From April 24 – May 4, UMC held its General Conference in Tampa. On May 2, delegates voted on divesting from three corporate giants – Caterpillar, Motorola Solutions and Hewlett-Packard. All three serve Israel’s occupation harshness.
Caterpillar produces giant bulldozers. Their blades extend about 21 feet wide and 7 feet high. Israel lawlessly uses them to destroy Palestinian homes and property.
Motorola Solutions sells settlements virtual fences and radar detection systems to spot nearby human movement. They’re also for Israel’s Separation Wall, the one around Gaza, another being constructed on Lebanon’s border, and Israel’s military.
Installations are erected on private Palestinian land. Other occupation and military related equipment and services are provided.
Israel’s military checkpoints use Hewlett-Packard’s Basel System technology to prevent free movement, deter students from reaching school, workers from places of employment, farmers from their fields, Palestinians from accessing medical care, and enforcing family separations.
HP also sells Israel’s navy hardware used to blockade Gaza.
These and many other US companies serve Israel’s occupation harshness. Global BDS supporters and human rights activists urge boycotting and divesting from them. So does Cape Town’s Anglican Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu.
On April 28, he wrote UMC. In part, he said:
Palestine must be liberated. As an occupying power, Israel bares the onus. Faith and love supporters must help.
“I therefore wholeheartedly support your action to disinvest from companies who benefit from the Occupation of Palestine. This is a moral position that I have no choice but to support, especially since I know of the effect that Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions had on the apartheid regime in South Africa.”
“May God bless your conference as you deliberate on this matter, and I pray that your decision will reflect the best values of the human family as we stand in solidarity with the oppressed.”
United Methodist Kairos Response (UMKR) supports divestment. Its landmark 2009 “Kairos Palestine” document urged “stand(ing) by the Palestinian people who have faced oppression, displacement, suffering and clear apartheid for more than six decades.”
It advocates boycotts, divestment, and sanctions against Israel. It also backs “non-violent resistance to the Israeli occupation.”
Its resolution on UMC investments states in part:
“For more than 40 years, every United Methodist Church General Conference has endorsed calls for just and lasting peace for all Israelis and Palestinians, including an end to all military sales to the whole region.”
“Tragically, ongoing military occupation and expanding Israeli settlements on Palestinian lands have deepened a system of violence and discrimination that dehumanizes Palestinians and Israelis.”
“The biblical mandate to be peacemakers demands that we express our love of our Palestinian and Israeli neighbors both in word and through nonviolent actions. (Matthew 5: 9, 1 John 3:17-18)”
“Palestinian Christians have implored Christians everywhere to put actions behind their words to end Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land. Although (UMC) has long opposed the occupation, The United Methodist Church boards and agencies still hold stock in companies that sustain it.”
“Many faith groups and organizations around the world have already divested or publicly support divestment.[viii] The Church should lead with prophetic action by publicly and promptly aligning its investments with longstanding church policies opposing the Israeli occupation. Such action is supported by mission personnel who have served in the Holy Land since the 1990s.”
“In light of our theological discernment of moral and biblical justice, the General Conference calls on The United Methodist Church to end its financial involvement in Israel’s occupation by divesting from companies that sustain the occupation.”
UMKR urged UMC delegates to approve divesting from Caterpillar, Motorola and Hewlett-Packard.
UMC members overwhelmingly endorse divestment. According to UMKR leader Susanne Hoder, 94% of them want Israel’s occupation ended. “We do not believe the church should profit from a situation we have overwhelmingly stated we want to end.”
In late April, 60 Minutes covered the issue in a Christians of the Holy Land segment. Hoder was interviewed. She said:
“It is heartening to see that the media is finally telling the American public what is happening to the Christian community in the Holy Land. It’s what we’ve been trying for years to tell people about.”
She discussed divestment and UMKR’s resolution. She said “(w)e are helping awaken the consciousness of American faith communities and Americans in general.”
60 Minutes explained Israel’s “burgeoning settlements” and Separation Wall. Bethlehem residents say it turned the city into an “open-air prison.” CBS reporter Bob Simon said “just leaving Bethlehem is a struggle” because of Israeli checkpoints.
UMC Spurns Hope and Change
Millions of Methodists and human rights activists hoped delegates would vote to divest. Disappointment followed rejection.
A UMKR statement said:
“The conference faced a choice between standing with the oppressed as Jesus did, or yielding to fear. It appears that they yielded to fear as a result of misinformation spread about the consequences of supporting divestment.”
“The brutal reality of the Israeli occupation can no longer be hidden, and the myth that Christians are leaving the Holy Land because of Muslim pressure has been exposed as false.”
“Palestinian Christians who traveled 6,000 miles to share their reality told delegates that they suffer alongside their Muslim neighbors from Israel’s occupation.”
Small victories accompanied defeat. Several UMC churches decided independently to divest. They expressed hope others would follow their example.
A Jewish Voice for Peace statement said in part:
“JVP is disappointed that the resolution….failed to pass….Since the last Methodist General Assembly in 2008, support for divestment has grown enormously….We are pleased that the church has come to a consensus that the Israeli occupation is wrong and must end. We are gratified to share with our Methodist friends this commitment to ending the occupation and its wrongful treatment of Palestinians.”
“We salute the United Methodist Kairos Response for their organizing efforts. We will continue to work with them and with all people of good conscience in an effort to end the Israeli occupation and to bring justice and peace.”
A Final Comment
Great struggles are long-term. Progress comes slowly. BDS and other initiatives chip away at Israel’s occupation. Defeating South African apartheid took time. One day Palestine will be liberated.
On May 2, UMC failed the test. Several UMC regional churches did the right thing. Eventually perhaps they all will. Hopefully groundswell support from other faith-based groups will follow.
Israeli apartheid exceeds South Africa’s harshness. Apartheid is an international crime. Israel stands flagrantly guilty but unaccountable. Punitive collective punishment and state sponsored terror are policies. So aren’t land theft, displacement, and numerous other crimes against humanity.
For decades, apartheid was South African policy. Ending it took time. In February 1990, President FW de Klerk freed Nelson Mandela. In 1992, a whites-only referendum approved reform.
On April 27, 1994, blacks and white voted together for the first time. The African National Congress (ANC) won overwhelmingly. A Government of National Unity was formed under Mandela as president.
South African liberation has a long way to go. Neoliberal harshness replaced apartheid. Nonetheless, an important victory was won.
Palestinians will win theirs. Momentum builds towards it. UMC’s conference inched forward. Other successes will follow. Palestine one day will be free. It’s just a matter of time.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”
http://www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html
Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.
Tarek Mehanna: Criminalized for Doing the Right Thing
by Stephen Lendman
Post-9/11, the Bush administration declared war on terror. It was sham cover for eroding personal freedoms and waging war on humanity.
Muslims became prime targets. They’ve been victimized, vilified, and persecuted for their faith, ethnicity, prominence, activism, and charity.
They’ve been hunted down, rounded up, held in detention, kept in isolation, denied bail, restricted in their right to counsel, tried on secret evidence, convicted on bogus charges, and given long sentences.
They’ve been incarcerated in segregated Communication Management Units (CMUs). Doing so violates US Prison Bureau regulations and the Supreme Court’s February 2005 Johnson v. California decision.
They’re political prisoners, not criminals. Based on scoundrel media reports, you’d never know it. They’re complicit supporters of state terror.
On October 21, 2009, Mehanna was wrongfully and maliciously charged with “conspir(ing) with Ahmad Abousamra and others to provide material support and resources for use in carrying out a conspiracy to kill, kidnap, main or injure persons or damage property in a foreign country and extraterritorial homicide of a US national.”
No evidence whatever proved it. Nonetheless, he was accused of conspiring with others “to participate in violent jihad against American interests and that they would talk about fighting jihad and their desire to die on the battlefield.”
False charges also claimed they “attempted to radicalize others and inspire each other by, among other things, watching and distributing jihadi videos.”
In fact, there was no plot, no crime, no intent to commit one, and no evidence proving otherwise. He was targeted for posting pro-jihadist material online. According to Massachusetts ACLU education director Nancy Murray:
“It might be speech that horrifies people, but it’s the nature of the First Amendment to protect that speech, unless it’s leading to imminent lawless action.”
No matter. On June 24, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled nonviolent speech and advocacy “coordinated with (or) under the direction of” foreign terrorist groups illegal.
In other words, lawful nonviolent political advocacy, peace conference participation, human rights advocacy training, related legal services and advice, as well as donating cash and humanitarian aid may be unconstitutionally used to convict.
In its 6 – 3 ruling, doing so the Court said violated the Patriot Act prohibition against providing material support to groups designated Foreign Terrorist Organizations.
In Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), the High Court ruled government can’t punish inflammatory speech unless directed to incite lawless action.
In Texas v. Johnson (1989), Justice William Brennan wrote the majority opinion, saying:
“(I)f there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable.”
Former Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall added:
“Above all else, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression (regardless of its) ideas…subject matter (or) content….Our people are guaranteed the right to express any thought, free from government censorship.”
Today’s High Court has no Brennans or Marshalls. Attornies General like Ramsey Clark no longer exist.
No wonder Mehanna was convicted. “Secret evidence,” unavailable to defense attorneys, was elaborately manipulated to do it. Justice was nowhere in sight. First Amendment rights don’t matter. Without them all others are at risk.
Already gravely eroded, they’re perilously close to disappearing all together. America’s on a slippery slope to tyranny. Freedom hangs by a thread. Anyone challenging state power is vulnerable. Constitutional protections don’t apply.
Intimidated juries most always go along with prosecutors. On December 20, Mehanna was found guilty on seven counts of “conspiring to provide material support to terrorists, conspiring to kill in a foreign country, and of lying to authorities in a terrorism investigation.”
Obama got another trophy. Unpopular views may be criminalized.
On April 12, sentencing was pronounced. An FBI Boston Division announced it, saying:
“A Sudbury, Massachusetts man who was convicted last year on charges that he conspired to kill Americans was sentenced today to 17.5 years in federal prison.”
“US District Court Judge George A. O’Toole, Jr. sentenced Tarek Mehanna, 29, to 210 months, to be followed by seven years of supervised release.”
“Mehanna was convicted of conspiracy to provide material support to al Qaeda, providing material support to terrorists (and conspiracy to do so), conspiracy to commit murder in a foreign country, conspiracy to make false statements to the FBI, and two counts of making false statements.”
Last December, the ACLU of Massachusetts condemned the conviction, saying it “undermine(d) the First Amendment and threaten(ed) national security.”
“Under the government’s theory of the case, ordinary people – including writers and journalists, academic researchers, translators, and even ordinary web surfers – could be prosecuted for researching or translating controversial and unpopular ideas. If the verdict is not overturned on appeal, the First Amendment will be seriously compromised.”
On April 13, the Boston Globe reported Mehanna’s father, Ahmed, expressing outrage about his conviction. He said it shows America is more repressive than the Egyptian government he grew up under decades earlier.
Mehanna’s support committee issued a statement, saying:
“This isn’t over….This is bigger than Tarek and it’s bigger than his family. It affects all of you reading this….Tarek, we stand with you, helping to bear” up against state oppression. “When we share our struggle, we are never alone.”
Those who know Mehanna call him “humble, reserved, warm, compassionate, intelligent, charismatic, well-read, and dedicated.” He challenges injustice, advocates for Muslim prisoners, and helps people in need.
No matter. He’ll spend the next 17.5 years in prison for doing the right thing. Obama prosecutors call it terrorism or conspiracy to commit it. It’s the wrong time to be Muslim in America. Moreover, we’re all as vulnerable as Tarek.
Mehanna’s Sentencing Statement
“I learned about the American-led sanctions that prevented food, medicine, and medical equipment from entering Iraq, and how – according to the United Nations – over half a million children perished as a result.”
“I remember a clip from a ’60 Minutes‘ interview of Madeline Albright where she expressed her view that these dead children were ‘worth it.’ I watched on September 11th as a group of people felt driven to hijack airplanes and fly them into buildings from their outrage at the deaths of these children.”
“I watched as America then attacked and invaded Iraq directly. I saw the effects of shock and awe in the opening day of the invasion – the children in hospital wards with shrapnel from American missiles sticking but of their foreheads.”
“I learned about the town of Haditha, where 24 Muslims – including a 76-year old man in a wheelchair, women, and even toddlers – were shot up and blown up in their bedclothes as the slept by US Marines. I learned about Abeer al-Janabi, a fourteen-year old Iraqi girl gang-raped by five American soldiers, who then shot her and her family in the head, then set fire to their corpses.”
“I just want to point out, as you can see, Muslim women don’t even show their hair to unrelated men. So try to imagine this young girl from a conservative village with her dress torn off, being sexually assaulted by not one, not two, not three, not four, but five soldiers.”
“Even today, as I sit in my jail cell, I read about the drone strikes which continue to kill Muslims daily in places like Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen. Just last month, we all heard about the seventeen Afghan Muslims – mostly mothers and their kids – shot to death by an American soldier, who also set fire to their corpses.”
I mentioned Paul Revere – when he went on his midnight ride, it was for the purpose of warning the people that the British were marching to Lexington to arrest Sam Adams and John Hancock, then on to Concord to confiscate the weapons stored there by the Minuteman.”
By the time they got to Concord, they found the Minuteman waiting for them, weapons in hand. They fired at the British, fought them, and beat them. From that battle came the American Revolution. There’s an Arabic word to describe what those Minutemen did that day. That word is: JIHAD, and this is what my trial was about.”
“All those videos and translations and childish bickering over ‘Oh, he translated this paragraph’ and ‘Oh, he edited that sentence,’ and all those exhibits revolved around a single issue: Muslims who were defending themselves against American soldiers doing to them exactly what the British did to America.”
“It was made crystal clear at trial that I never, ever plotted to ‘kill Americans’ at shopping malls or whatever the story was. The government’s own witnesses contradicted this claim, and we put expert after expert up on that stand, who spent hours dissecting my every written word, who explained my beliefs.”
“Further, when I was free, the government sent an undercover agent to prod me into one of their little ‘terror plots,’ but I refused to participate. Mysteriously, however, the jury never heard this.”
A Final Comment
Tarek reflects the best of what America should be, but never was and isn’t now. He’ll suffer in prison. So do thousands of others wrongfully convicted. America’s gulag is notorious. It’s the world’s largest by far.
It’s the shame of the nation. It reflects repression, not justice. Those most vulnerable are victimized. Muslims are target one.
What kind of society criminalizes praying to the wrong God? What’s ahead if public rage won’t challenge it? Imagine the worst because it’s coming.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.
http://www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour/.